Labor productivity and material incentives in the Soviet metallurgy industry during the NEP years (based on materials from the "Serp i Molot" factory and the Moscow Machine Trust)
- Authors: Chudinov A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 30-44
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0609/article/view/366682
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JRZLHI
- ID: 366682
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The disclosure of the human potential of the Soviet worker was one of the most important tasks of the government in the 1920s, the solution to which was seen in increasing labor productivity. The main goal of our research is a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between the dynamics of labor productivity and wages during the period of the New Economic Policy, examined through the example of the "Sickle and Hammer" factory and other industrial enterprises that were part of the Machine Trust. Throughout the work, monthly data on these indicators for the years 1924–1926 were collected and systematized, which allowed for a thorough analysis of the differences in their growth rates and the identification of factors that had a significant impact on these differences. This period was chosen as it allows for the characterization of the trends existing during the peak of the New Economic Policy. In this work, a microanalysis method was used, which allowed for the examination of the interaction between labor productivity and wages based on specific enterprises. Additionally, methods of systematic analysis, as well as problem-chronological and dialectical methods, were employed in the article. The conducted research demonstrated that the management of the "Sickle and Hammer" factory failed during this historical period to align the growth of nominal wages with the indicators of labor productivity of industrial workers. It should be emphasized that the rates of growth in real wages and labor productivity had only slight discrepancies. A significant result of this research was not only the introduction of new statistical data and materials into scientific circulation but also the systematization of the factors influencing the dynamics of labor productivity and wages in the context of the New Economic Policy. The following factors were identified as influencing labor productivity at a specific enterprise: the size of the industrial enterprise, the nomenclature and assortment of produced goods, the strategic position of the enterprise in the production chain, time loss, and the reasons determining those losses. At the same time, a number of other factors complicated the solution of the crucial task of halting the pace of wage growth. The management of the enterprise had to make managerial decisions under extremely difficult conditions of acute shortages of skilled labor, the presence of influential trade unions, and the necessity of meeting production targets.
References
Ильюхов А. А. Как платили большевики: Политика советской власти в сфере оплаты труда в 1917–1941 гг. М.: РОССПЭН, 2010. – 415 с. Суворова Л. Н. Нэповская многоукладная экономика: между государством и рынком. М.: АИРО-XXI, 2013. – 303 с. Журавлев С. В., Мухин М. Ю. "Крепость социализма": Повседневность и мотивация труда на советском предприятии, 1928–1938 гг. М.: РОССПЭН, 2004. – 240 с. Соколов А. К. Советская политика в области мотивации и стимулирования труда (1917 – середина 1930-х годов) // Экономическая история. Обозрение. Вып. 4. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 2000. С. 39-80. Ульянова С. Б. "То на скаку, то на боку": Массовые хозяйственно-политические кампании в петроградской/ленинградской промышленности в 1921–1928 гг. СПб.: Изд-во Политехнического ун-та, 2006. – 529 с. Чистякова К. А. Движение за научную организацию труда 1920-х – 1930-х годов в Советской России: К истории формирования российской школы "человеческих отношений": дис. ... канд. ист. наук : 07.00.02 / Чистякова Ксения Анатольевна. – Москва, 2004. – 280 с. Постников С. П., Фельдман М. А. Социокультурный облик промышленных рабочих России в 1900–1941 гг. М.: РОССПЭН, 2009. – 367 с. Шильникова И.В. «Как жали рабочих, так и будут жать»: причины конфликтов на советских предприятиях в годы нэпа // Исторический журнал: научные исследования. 2015. № 6. С. 737-743. doi: 10.7256/2454-0609.2015.6.17428 Борисова Л. В. Трудовые конфликты в Советской России (1918–1924 гг.). М.: Собрание, 2006. – 288 с. Бородкин Л. И., Сафонова Е. И. Мотивация труда на фабрике "Трехгорная мануфактура" в первые годы советской власти // Историко-экономические исследования. 2002. № 1. С. 55-87. Маркевич А. М., Соколов А. К. "Магнитка близ Садового кольца": Стимулы к работе на Московском заводе "Серп и молот", 1883–2001 гг. М.: РОССПЭН, 2005. – 368 с. Корнаковский И. Л. От "Гужона" к "Серпу и молоту" (история Московского металлургического завода "Серп и молот" в документах, 1883–1932 гг.). М.: [б. и.], 2009. – 367 с. Экономическое наследие. НЭП и хозрасчет / Центр. экон.-мат. ин-т АН СССР, Ин-т экономики АН СССР; редкол.: Н. Я. Петраков (пред.) и др.; сост., предисл., коммент. Н. Я. Петраков и др. – М.: Экономика, 1991. – 364 с. Вайнштейн Альб. Л. Избранные труды: в 2 кн. Кн. 2. / Альб. Л. Вайнштейн. – М.: Наука, 2000. – 560 с.
Supplementary files
