The role of the armed forces in the April 2002 coup attempt in Venezuela
- Authors: Sizenov P.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 36-46
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0609/article/view/366495
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TGJVSY
- ID: 366495
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of the influence of representatives of the National Armed Forces of Venezuela on the course and results of the coup in April 2002. The relevance of the topic is determined by the fact that the failed coup became a key point in the first stage of the government of Hugo Chavez and largely determined the president's policy towards further establishing personal control over all institutions of power, as well as definitively outlined the harsh anti-American vector of the Bolivarian policy. The emphasis on the actions of military officials in the coup makes it possible to determine their real significant role in the April events. In this regard, attention is paid to the influence of the institution of the army in general and individual officers in particular on political processes in Venezuela. The methodological basis in the article is provided by general scientific (descriptive, analysis and synthesis), as well as historical (chronological) and political science (institutional) research methods. In Russian historiography, the episode with the coup, as a rule, was considered within the framework of global studies on H. Chavez and Chavismo in general. Therefore, within the framework of the work, more emphasis is placed on foreign historiography. These facts determine the novelty of the work, which consists both in attracting previously unused materials to the study, and in specifying the topic of the coup and the role of the Venezuelan Armed Forces in it. Based on the analyzed data, the conclusions of the work indicate that the actual intervention of senior officers in the political crisis in the country initially brought the presidency to the putschists, and then deprived them of almost seized power, ensuring the return of Hugo Chavez to the Miroflores Palace. In addition, independence in the actions of the military is emphasized in the conditions of chaos and a vacuum of power that came on April 11, 2002. In this regard, it is also indicated that specifically the senior officers acted spontaneously and were not actively involved in the real-life conspiratorial circles that were preparing a coup d'etat. Therefore, when the military most important for the coup saw that the measures taken by the putschists did not meet their vision, they deprived the right of their support and did not actually oppose the fact that another group of military officers returned the legitimately elected president to office.
References
Дабагян, Э.С Государства – сколько необходимо, рынка – сколько возможно. // Латинская Америка. 2005, № 11. Кусакина, М.В. «Боливарианский проект» развития Венесуэлы. // Власть 2007, №11. С. 114-117. Fernandez, J.M Sobre la participacion de Espana y de EEUU en el golpe de estado de Venezuela 2004 Retrieved from https://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2004/11/24/espana/1101319375.html (дата обращения 27.04.2024) López Maya, M. Venezuela 2001-2004: actores y estrategias en la lucha hegemónica // Cuadernos del Cendes 2004, Augus, p. 23-48. Gott, R. Hugo Chávez and the Bolivarian Revolution. – London: Verso, 2005. – 315 p. Nelson, Brian A. The silence and the scorpion : the coup against Chávez and the making of modern Venezuela. – New York: Nation Books, A Member of the Perseus Books Group, 2009. – 355 p. Николаева, Л.Б. Нефть и национальные интересы // Латинская Америка 2005, №12. Rey, J.C. Consideraciones políticas sobre un insólito golpe de Estado. 2002. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20090103201015/http://www.analitica.com/bitblioteca/juan_carlos_rey/insolito_golpe.asp (дата обращения 27.04.2024) Velasco, А. Barrio Rising: Urban Popular Politics and the Making of Modern Venezuela. – California: University of California Press, 2015. – 344 p. Ежегодный бюллетень Международного института стратегических исследований The Military Balance 2001. Routledge, 2001. Trinkunas, Harold A. Civil-Military Relations in Venezuela after 11 April: Beyond Repair? // Strategic Insights, 2002, Volume I, Issue 3. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20071116161754/http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/may02/latinAmerica.asp (дата обращения 27.04.2024) Колесников, А. Чавес во власти 1998-2003. Восстановление нефти. Всеобщая забастовка.Глава из книги: «В поисках энергии: Ресурсные войны, новые технологии и будущее энергетики» Дэниел Ергин. 2020. https://smart-lab.ru/blog/618939.php (дата обращения 27.04.2024) Голингер, Э. Поведение Вашингтона было «прозрачным, как вода» // Латинская Америка 2011, №1. С. 71-88. Матанцев-Воинов, А.Н. Как США пожирают другие страны мира. Стратегия анаконды. Венесуэла. https://pub.wikireading.ru/36597 (дата обращения 27.04.2024) REVIEWS. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/2FDCA944986E0D6ED7841CA610BD9A60/S0003161500005794a.pdf/the_silence_and_the_scorpion_the_coup_against_chavez_and_the_making_of_modern_venezuela_by_brian_a_nelson_new_york_nation_books_2009_pp_xv_355_illustrations_maps_appendix_glossary_notes_index_2695_cloth.p (дата обращения 27.04.2024) Venezuelan President Changes Military Leadership. Retrieved http://en.people.cn/200204/16/eng20020416_94133.shtml (дата обращения 27.04.2024) A Review of U.S. Policy Toward Venezuela November 2001-April 2002 Report Number 02-OIG-003, July 2002. Retrieved from https://mronline.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/13682.pdf (дата обращения 27.04.2024) Сапожников К.Н. Уго Чавес. – М.: Издательство «Молодая гвардия», 2013. – 482 с. Строганова Е.Д. США и левые режимы Латинской Америки (вторая половина XX – начало XXI в.). – М.: Издательство «Весь Мир», 2017. – 288 с. Белоглазов, А.В. Масленников, А.В. Феномен «левого поворота» в странах Латинской Америки в 1998–2012 годах // Вестник Чувашского университета 2013, №1. С. 3-11.
Supplementary files
