Legal Analysis of the Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence, through the Prism of "Animals", "Human" and other Persons for the Stability of the Structure

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The author explores the phenomenon of the legal personality of AI through the prisms of the constructions of the rights of animals, humans and certain types of persons. Theoretical and practical approaches to highlighting the legal personality of AI through the prism of a legal entity, animal, human are considered. Practical approaches are being studied on the conditions for the allocation of legal personality through the construction of Habeas Corpus, membership of the "board of directors", as well as the authorship of AI. The main legal structures for the implementation of this legal personality, the positions of the relevant authorities, as well as the stability of individual decisions at the level of consideration by the judiciary and compensatory legal measures that ensure the safe integration of AI into the sphere of public legal relations in Russia are determined. The subject of the study is the formalization of the actions of artificial intelligence as a separate subject of law in the private legal and public fields. The object of the study is regulatory documents, recommendations and other documents regulating the issues of distinguishing the legal personality of AI in Russia and foreign countries, academic publications on the issues under study. The research methodology integrates a complex of modern philosophical, general scientific, special scientific methods of cognition, including dialectical, systemic, structural-functional, hermeneutical, comparative legal, formal legal (dogmatic), etc. The measures proposed as a result of the study can be applied in the legislative and law enforcement practice of relevant authorities implementing the integration of artificial intelligence into the sphere of public and public relations in Russia.

References

  1. Artificial Intelligence U.S. Department of State: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.state.gov/artificial-intelligence/ (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  2. Си Цзиньпин: технологии искусственного интеллекта станут новым драйвером экономики Китая: [сайт]. — URL: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/5745558 (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  3. Владимир Путин поручил искусственному интеллекту поднимать российскую промышленность: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2022/11/25/952049-putin-poruchil-iskusstvennomu-intellektu-podnimat-promishlennost (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  4. Обсерватория ИИ ОЭСР: [сайт]. — URL: https://oecd.ai/ (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  5. Габов А.В., Хаванова И.А. Эволюция роботов и право XXI века. // Вестник Томского государственного университета.-2018.-№ 435.-С. 215–233.
  6. Гаджиев Г. А., Войниканис Е. А. Может ли робот быть субъектом права? (поиск правовых форм для регулирования цифровой экономики) //Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. – 2018. – №. 4. – С. 24–48.
  7. Cahen, Murielle. Le droit des robots: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.murielle-cahen.com/publications/robot.asp (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  8. Bensamoun Alexandra, Loiseau Grégoire. L’intelligence artificielle : faut-il légiférer? // RD-Recueil Dalloz, 2017. No. 11. P. 581
  9. ХА́БЕАС КО́РПУС АКТ 1679-определение, данное Большой российской энциклопедией: [сайт]. — URL: https://bigenc.ru/law/text/4727225 (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  10. People ex rel. Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Lavery (‘Lavery I’), 998 N.Y.S.2d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014): [сайт]. — URL: https://casetext.com/case/people-v-lavery-6. (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  11. Orangutana Sandra s/ Recurso de Casación s/Habeas Corpus (‘Sandra I’), Cámara Federal de Casación Penal, CCC 68831/2014/CFC1 (2014): [сайт]. — URL: https://ww w.nonhumanrights.org/blog/copy-of-argentine-court-ruling/ (дата обращения 21.02.2022)
  12. Zaffaroni E. R. La Pachamama y el humano. – 2011.
  13. Zaffaroni E. R., Alagia A., Slokar A. Derecho penal: parte general. – Buenos Aires : Ediar, 2000. – Т. 2.
  14. Asociacion de Funcionarios y Abogados por los Derechos de los Animales y Otros contra GBCA sobre amparo (‘Sandra II’), EXPTE. A2174-2015/0 (2015): [сайт]. — URL: https://ijudicial.gob.ar/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Sentencia-Orangutana.pdf. (дата обращения 21.02.2022)
  15. AHC4806–2017 (‘Chucho’), Radicación no. l7001–22–13–000–2017–00468–02: [сайт]. — URL: http://static.iris.net.co/semana/upload/documents/radicado-n-17001-22-13-000-2017-00468-02.pdf. (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  16. Colombia’s Constitutional Court Denies Habeas Corpus for Andean Bear. The City Paper Bogotá: [сайт]. — URL: https://thecitypaperbogota.com/ news/colombias-constitutional-court-denies-habeas-corpus-for-andean-bear/23781 (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  17. Karnail Singh and others v. state of Haryana (‘Karnail Singh’), Punjab & Haryana High Court, CRR-533-2013: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/p df_upload-361239.pdf (дата обращения 21.02.2022)
  18. O’Donnell E. L. At the intersection of the sacred and the legal: Rights for nature in Uttarakhand, India //Journal of Environmental Law. – 2018. – Т. 30. – №. 1. – С. 135-144.
  19. Saudi Arabia Gives Citizenship to a Robot: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-26/saudi-arabia-gives-citizenship-to-a-robot-claims-global-first (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  20. System Citizenship Arabian Saudi: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.moi.gov.sa/wps/wcm/connect/121c03004d4bb7c98e2cdfbed7ca8368/EN_saudi_nationality_system.pdf?MOD=AJPERES (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  21. Tokyo: Artificial Intelligence 'Boy' Shibuya Mirai Becomes World's First AI Bot to Be Granted Residency: [сайт]. — URL: http://www.newsweek.com/tokyo-residency-artificial-intelligence-boy-shibuya-mirai-702382 (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  22. Immigration Control Act: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.isa.go.jp/en/applications/procedures/16-4.html (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  23. No. 57 of 1978: Patents Act, 1978. REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA .GOVERNMENT GAZETTE: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201504/act-57-1978.pdf (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  24. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PHASE I. : [сайт]. — URL: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201808/ippolicy2018-phasei.pdf (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  25. DABUS: South Africa issues first-ever patent with AI inventor: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.managingip.com/article/2a5czh91g6c8zwxjcpla8/dabus-south-africa-issues-first-ever-patent-with-ai-inventor (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  26. FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Thaler v Commissioner of Patents FCA 879. : [сайт]. — URL: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2021/2021fca0879 (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  27. PATENTS REGULATIONS 1991-REG 3.2C Specifications--formalities check for PCT application. : [сайт]. — URL: http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_reg/pr1991218/s3.2c.html (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  28. Solum L. B. Legal personhood for artificial intelligences //Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics. – Routledge, 2020. – С. 415-471.
  29. U.S. Reports: Dartmouth College v. Woodward., 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 518 (1819): [сайт]. — URL: https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep017518/ (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  30. COM(2021) 206 final 2021/0106(COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL LAYING DOWN HARMONISED RULES ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACT) AND AMENDING CERTAIN UNION LEGISLATIVE ACTS: [сайт]. — URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206&from=EN (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  31. Consortium Deep Knowledge Group: [сайт]. — URL: https://www.dkv.global/about (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  32. Artificial intelligence gets a seat in the boardroom: [сайт]. — URL: https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Artificial-intelligence-gets-a-seat-in-the-boardroom (дата обращения: 21.02.2023).
  33. Bayern S. et al. Company law and autonomous systems: a blueprint for lawyers, entrepreneurs, and regulators //Hastings Sci. & Tech. LJ. – 2017. – Т. 9. – С. 135.
  34. Ястребов О. А. Правосубъектность электронного лица: теоретико-методологические подходы //Труды Института государства и права Российской академии наук. – 2018. – Т. 13. – №. 2. – С. 36–55.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).