两头钉，还是民事诉讼中医疗案件的法医鉴定委员会
- 作者: Anisimov A.A.1,2, Gilmetdinova E.S.1, Nurmieva E.R.1, Khamitova G.M.1, Spiridonov V.A.1,3
-
隶属关系:
- Kazan State Medical University
- Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
- Forensic Center of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation
- 期: 卷 8, 编号 2 (2022)
- 页面: 51-58
- 栏目: CASE REPORTS
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2411-8729/article/view/122477
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/fm675
- ID: 122477
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
研究现实性：法医委员会是处理医疗案件的关键环节，其结论对法院至关重要。然而，专家们往往没有充分行使他们的权利，只检查医疗记录。这种做法对结论的具体性产生了不利影响，而这反过来又在刑事诉讼和民事诉讼中带来了法律风险。
专家案例描述。本文介绍了一个司法实践中的一个案例，该案例是从一级医院向在医疗过程中死亡的A.患者
的亲属追偿非金钱损害赔偿的案例委员会的法医检查未能确定死因和因果关系，理由是医疗记录不充分。委员会没有试图进一步收集有关此案的信息。受害者向一级和二级医院提起诉讼，总金额达250万卢布。一审法院驳回了这一请求，认为没有证据证明被告有罪。上诉法院推翻了这一裁决，并裁定被告必须证明自己无罪。然而，现有文件和专家意见都不允许这样做。法院向被告追讨了160万卢布。
结论。委员会的法医报告应作为案件的证据，法院可以对被告采取正式的执行方法，有时甚至在可能根据公认的标准和建议及时提供援助的情况下。
作者简介
Andrei A. Anisimov
Kazan State Medical University; Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Email: aa_anisimov@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5323-7226
SPIN 代码: 8870-5382
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan; Kazan
Elvina S. Gilmetdinova
Kazan State Medical University
Email: elvina.gilmetdinova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3561-4438
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan
Endzhe R. Nurmieva
Kazan State Medical University
Email: nurmievae@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6051-4044
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan
Gulnara M. Khamitova
Kazan State Medical University
Email: gulnarakgmu@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4167-2279
SPIN 代码: 5746-5562
Cand. Sci. (Legal), Associate Professor
俄罗斯联邦, KazanValeriy A. Spiridonov
Kazan State Medical University; Forensic Center of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vaspiridonov@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4004-8482
SPIN 代码: 4483-4430
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan; Kazan参考
- Mustafina LR, Khamitova GM. The constitutional right to healthcare and medical care for students in schools: chosen aspects. J Educational Social Res. 2019;9(4):53–57. doi: 10.2478/jesr-2019-0054
- Semina TV, Klevno VA, Gusev AY, Veselkina OV. Criminal responsibility of a doctor in modern Russia: monograph. Ed. by T.V. Semina. Moscow: Prospect; 2020. 351 р. (In Russ).
- Spiridonov VA. Forensic medical examinations in criminal cases against medical personnel: history and modernity. Kazan: Astori A; 2020. 126 р. (In Russ).
- Barinov EH. Forensic medical examination in civil proceedings in medical cases: monograph. 2nd ed., revised and updated. Moscow: Yurayt; 2019. 181 р. (In Russ).
- Shmarov LA. Causal relationship between action (inaction) and adverse outcome. Actual Problems Med Biology. 2018;(2):66–69. (In Russ). doi: 10.24411/2587-4926-2018-10022
- Galyukova MI. Features of interrogation of witnesses in civil cases related to compensation for moral damage due to poor-quality medical care. Russ Judge. 2019;(9):3–8. (In Russ).
- Barinov EH, Romodanovsky PO. Problems of forensic medical examinations conducted in the framework of civil proceedings. Med Right. 2011;(6):25–30. (In Russ).
- Barinov EH, Tikhomirov AV. Forensic medical examination in solving issues related to “medical disputes”. Med Expertise Law. 2010;(6):5–7. (In Russ).
- Barinov EH, Romodanovsky PO. The state of forensic medical examinations in civil cases related to “medical” disputes. Forensic Med Examination. 2013;56(6):37–40. (In Russ).
- Kalinin RE. Analysis of the testimony of medical workers during the examination of “medical” cases. Forensic Med. 2019;5(C1):110–111. (In Russ).
- Barinov EH, Kalinin RE, Romodanovsky PO. Forensic medical examination based on the materials of a “medical” case in the absence of primary medical documentation (case from practice). Bulletin Forensic Med. 2018;(1):40–44. (In Russ).
