Forensic evaluation of ankle injury sustained as a result of a hoverboard impact: case from practice

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Currently, the so-called means of individual mobility are gaining high popularity. Their use naturally entailed an increase in the number of road “incidents”, as well as the number of examinations carried out. The question of the most “traumatic” parts of the human body, the type volume of injuries in this type of injury in the domestic forensic medical literature has not been studied to date.

A description of the case from practice is given: citizen A. received an isolated injury to the right ankle joint when a person driving a hoverboard hit her. Citizen A. was hospitalized in the surgical department of the district hospital, where she underwent inpatient treatment and was discharged on the 16th day after the grass. The patient was examined by doctors, she underwent radiography of the right tibia. During the commission forensic medical examination on the case file with the examination of the victim, with the involvement of a radiologist as an expert and a detailed description of the radiographs, conclusions were made about the localization, nature, amount of damage, as well as the severity of the harm caused to health.

Analysis of foreign studies suggests that injuries associated with the participation of gyroscooters occur mainly when falling with the formation of fractures of the bones of the upper limbs. However, some authors cite cases of lower limb injuries with ankle injury. This case confirms the research of some foreign authors. In addition, this case clearly illustrates the role and significance of an additional instrumental method of research (radiography) and objective examination of the injured of the expert commission.

作者简介

Maxim Siedin

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute; Bureau of Forensic Medical Examination of the Health Committee of the Kursk region

Email: dablV1@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4724-4008

MD, Correspondence Postgraduate Student

俄罗斯联邦, 1 bld 61/2, Shchepkina str., Moscow; Kursk

Semyon Plis

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute

Email: SSPlis.work@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0232-0425
SPIN 代码: 4347-1925

Assistant Lecturer

俄罗斯联邦, 1 bld 61/2, Shchepkina str., Moscow

Vladimir Klevno

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vladimir.klevno@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5693-4054
SPIN 代码: 2015-6548

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

俄罗斯联邦, 1 bld 61/2, Shchepkina str., Moscow

参考

  1. Jung AA, Shevtsova AG. Assessment of the accident rate of means of individual mobility in various traffic conditions. Modern Sci. 2021;(2):31–36. (In Russ). doi: 10.53039/2079-4401.2021.4.2.007
  2. Bloom MB, Noorzad A, Lin C, et al. Standing electric scooter injuries: impact on community. Am J Surg. 2021;221(1):227–232. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.020
  3. Kalyuzhny YN. Modern problems of legislative regulation of the use of certain types of electric transport. Administrative Law Practice Administration. 2019;5:27–33. (In Russ). doi: 10.7256/2306-9945.2019.5.30729
  4. Soynikov SA. Features of determining the administrative and legal status of road users using modern technical means of transportation (means of individual mobility). Bulletin Economic Security. 2020;1:216–219. (In Russ). doi: 10.24411/2414-3995-2020-10040
  5. Donnally CJ, Lawrie CM, Rush AJ, et al. The season of hoverboards: a case series of fractures. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017;33(5):325–328. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001120
  6. Schapiro AH, Lall NU, Anton CG, et al. Hoverboards: spectrum of injury and association with an uncommon fracture. Pediatric Raliol. 2017;47(4):437–441. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3766-9
  7. Sobel AD, Reid DB, Blood TD, et al. Pediatric orthopedic hoverboard injuries: a prospectively enrolled cohort. J Pediatr. 2017;190:271–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.07.041
  8. Monteilh C, Patel P, Gaffney J. Muskuloskeletal injuries associated with hoverboard use in children. Clin Pediatr. 2017;56(10):909–911. doi: 10.1177/0009922817706143
  9. Bandzar S, Funsch DG, Hermansen R, et al. Pediatric hoverboard and skateboard injuries. Pediatrics. 2018;141(4):e20171253. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1253
  10. Hosseinzadeh P, Devries C, Saldana RE, et al. Hoverboard injuries in children and adolescents: results of a multicenter study. J Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2019;28(6):555–558. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000653
  11. Al-Kashmiri A, Hasan AQ, Al-Shaqsi S. Rolling danger: the epidemiology of injuries caused by hoverboards in the United States in five years (2011–2016). J Emerg Crit Care Med. 2017;1:32. doi: 10.21037/jeccm.2017.10.02
  12. Tan AL, Nadkarni N, Wong TH, et al. The price of personal mobility: burden of injury and mortality from personal mobility devices in Singapore ― a nationwide cohort stude. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7210-6
  13. Do MT, McFaull S, Cheesman J, et al. Emergency department preentations for hoverboard-related injuries: the electronic Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program, 2015 to 2016. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016;36(12):316–317. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.12.06
  14. Ho M, Horn BD, Lin IC, et al. Musculoskeletal injuries resulting from use of hoverboars: safety concerns with an unregulated consumer product. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018;57(1):31–35. doi: 10.1177/0009922816687327
  15. Robinson T, Agarwal M, Chaudhary S, et al. Pediatric hoverboard injuries: a need for enhanced safety measures and public awareness. Clin Pediatr. 2016;55(11):1078–1080. doi: 10.1177/0009922816664066

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Siedin M.S., Plis S.S., Klevno V.A., 2022

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。
##common.cookie##