Messenger chats as evidence in сivil and arbitration proceedings — Russian judicial practice

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The development of production and distribution relations, which are forms of interaction among society and individuals, and social groups presupposes the adequate development of procedural legal means for ensuring (implementing and protecting) the constitutional rights of participants in these relations. As is well known, the socioeconomic conditions of human society development provide new sources and means of judicial evidence. The task of justice is to provide participants in a judicial dispute with a legal opportunity to use acceptable judicial evidence in accordance with the procedures established by law. This study analyzes the judicial practice of using information from the messenger chat in court proceedings and formulates rules for using the messenger chat and screenshots as an acceptable judicial proof. Among these rules, the following should be noted: mandatory identification of the message recipient, identification of the true will of the message sender, coordination of the order of sending messages via messenger chat, etc.

The article discusses the opinion of scientists about the attribution of a screenshot to written or electronic evidence.

Considerable attention is paid to the problem of using correspondence in the messenger chats as a source of judicial evidence in resolving labor disputes.

The authors made a final conclusion about the positive attitude of Russian courts to the use of information from the messenger chats as a legal source of judicial evidence. The rules of their application warrant attention.

 

作者简介

Ekaterina Rusakova

RUDN University

Email: rusakova-ep@rudn.ru

PhD, Associate Professor at the Department of Civil Law and Procedure and Private International Law

俄罗斯联邦

Viktor Zaitsev

RUDN University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vickt.zayczev2012@yandex.ru

Student

俄罗斯联邦

参考

  1. Barabash A.S. Main, additional and auxiliary processes of proof at the stages of preliminary investigation and trial: Monograph. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2017. 272 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Lukyanova I.N. On non-Traditional means of proof or on the conditions of predictability of the use of electronic correspondence in civil proceedings. Actual problems of civil procedure law: Sat. mater. International. scientific-practical Conf., dedicated. The 80th anniversary of the birthday of A.T. Bonner. Moscow: Prospect. 2017. P. 106-115. (In Russ.).
  3. Artebyakina N.A. Protocol of inspection by a notary of an Internet page as a means of providing evidence in civil proceedings. Bulletin of civil procedure. 2019;(1):278. (In Russ.).
  4. Kotlyarova V.V. On the problems of legal regulation of electronic evidence in the civil process. Arbitration and civil process. 2019;(6):37-42. (In Russ.).
  5. Slesarev S. SMS and messengers in a labor dispute. Labor law. 2018;(1):5-16. (In Russ.).
  6. Zhizhina M.V. Theory and practice of applying modern criminalistics in the civil process: author's thesis ... Doctor of Legal Sciences, Moscow. 2017. P. 29-30. (In Russ.).
  7. Terekhova L.A. Information technologies in the practice of arbitration courts. Bulletin of civil procedure. 2017;(6):34-42 (In Russ.).
  8. Rents I.G. Facts and proofs in the international civil process: theoretical problems: author's thesis ... Doctor of Law. Yekaterinburg. 2018. P. 32. (In Russ.).
  9. Sukhova N.V., Filippov S.S. New types of evidence in the judicial process: questions of theory and practice. Problems of civil law and process: Collection of scientific articles. Ed. by I.E. Martynenko. Grodno: Grsu. 2017. P. 386-400. (In Russ.).
  10. Filippov A.E. separate legal aspects of regulating the turnover of digital assets in Russia and abroad. Arbitration disputes. 2018;(4):90. (In Russ.).
  11. Boriskina N.I. procedural form of evidence in modern civil proceedings: Dis. ... kand. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow state University. 2020. P. 60. (In Russ.).
  12. Demin A.A. features of legal regulation of electronic evidence in civil, arbitration, and administrative processes. Questions of Russian justice. 2019;(3):1076-1084. (In Russ.).
  13. Zarubina M.N., Pavlov A.A. On the procedural realities and potential possibilities of using electronic evidence in civil proceedings. Bulletin of civil procedure. 2019;(1):215. (In Russ.).
  14. Nakhova E.A. Problems of using electronic evidence in civil proceedings and administrative proceedings. Law. 2018;(4):82,85. (In Russ.).
  15. Mamychev A.Yu., Miroshnichenko O.Yu. Digital democracy in the context of a pandemic: ethical and legal aspects. Part 2. Advances in Law Studies. 2020;8(S5):100-104. (In Russ.).

版权所有 © Rusakova E.P., Zaitsev V.V., 2021

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##