Russia’s expectations of society from justice: will digitalization help?

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

The article explores the importance of justice in the life of society in conjunction with the rapidly developing processes of judicial digitalization. The data of domestic sociological studies are presented. It is reflecting the expectations of the Russian society from justice, which determine what requirements citizens make to judges. The article analyzes the ongoing “digital reform” in the field of justice, its program aims and objectives, the results achieved, as well as the impact of these results on the perception of the judicial system by society, and trust to it. It is stated that, a significant part of the stated program aims in the field of digitalization as a result of the implementation of the relevant federal programs has been achieved. However, despite some interconnection with society through the introduction of digital technology, the level of trust to the judiciary remains extremely low. The declared and achieved aims of the development of information technologies are applied. They have pragmatic nature, associated primarily with the acceleration of legal proceedings and rationalization of the doing of the judiciary and those involved in the orbit of their activities. However, the expectations of society are in the plane of comprehension, justice, adequacy of actions and decisions of judges, and are, rather, moral and professional nature, not limited to universally implemented information technologies. In this regard, it was concluded that the stated and achieved goals of the digitalization of the judicial sphere do not coincide with the expectations set by society for its functioning.

作者简介

Fedor Voskresensky

Lomonosov Moscow State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: voscresensky@mail.ru

Researcher at the Laboratory for Political and Legal Studies, Faculty of Political Science

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Anastasia Timchenko

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: avtimchenko@centero.ru

Researcher, Laboratory for Political and Legal Studies, Faculty of Political Science

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Bystryakova L.A. Razvitie informacionno-kommunikacionnoj kompetentnosti sotrudnikov pravoohranitel’nyh organov: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. Moscow, 2013.
  2. Cifrovaya transformaciya zdravoohraneniya — glavnyj prioritet razvitiya otrasli. Interv’yu s akademikom RAN G. Kotel’nikovym // Medicinskaya gazeta. 2019. № 24. URL: http://www.mgzt.ru/28-ot-24-iyulya-2019-g/tsifrovaya-transformatsiya-zdravookhraneniya-glavnyi-prioritet-razvitiya-otra (data obrashcheniya: 16.09.2019).
  3. Diagnostika raboty sudebnoj sistemy v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i predlozheniya po ee reformirovaniyu / T. Bocharov, V. Volkov, A. Dmitrieva i dr. Ch. I. Saint Petersburg: IPP EUSPb. 2016. 110 s.
  4. Doklad INDEM. «Kak grazhdane i predprinimateli ocenivayut sudej i sudy. Issledovanie deyatel’nosti sudebnoj vlasti Rossijskoj Federacii. Rezul’taty fokus-grupp s grazhdanami i predprinimatelyami». Moscow, 2008. URL: http://indem.ru/Proj/SudRef/soc/GrPrSu.htm (data obrashcheniya: 16.08.2019).
  5. Doklad INDEM «Spravedlivost’ v predstavleniyah i praktike grazhdan i vlasti v Rossii». Issledovanie osushchestvlyalos’ v 2013‒2015 gg. URL: http://indem.ru/Proj/Fairness/index.html (data obrashcheniya: 23.09.2019).
  6. Doklad INDEM «O doverii v odnom issledovanii fonda INDEM». URL: http://indem.ru/Proj/ODoverii.pdf. (data obrashcheniya: 23.09.2019).
  7. Doklad Fonda «Obshchestvennoe mnenie» «O sudah i sud’yah». Opublikovan 30 iyulya 2012 g. URL: https://fom.ru/posts/10551. (data obrashcheniya: 22.09.2019).
  8. Doklad FOM «Grazhdanskie prava i svobody. Situaciya s soblyudeniem prav cheloveka, samye vazhnye prava i svobody». Opublikovan 22 iyunya 2018 g. URL: https://fom.ru/TSennosti/14053 (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
  9. Doklad FOM «Reputaciya rossijskih sudej. Spravedlivy li rossijskie sud’i? Dolzhen li sud byt’ nezavisimym?». Opublikovan 13 marta 2017 g. URL: https://fom.ru/posts/13239 (data obrashcheniya: 19.09.2019).
  10. Doklad FOM «Sudy: predstavleniya ob ih spravedlivosti, nezavisimosti, lichnyj opyt. CHem rukovodstvuyutsya rossijskie sudy pri prinyatii reshenij? I mozhno li doveryat’ sudam prisyazhnyh?». Opublikovan 10 avgusta 2018 g. URL: https://fom.ru/Bezopasnost-i-pravo/14080 (data obrashcheniya: 12.09.2019).
  11. Gudkov L. Rossijskaya sudebnaya sistema v mneniyah obshchestva / L. Gudkov, B. Dubin, N. Zorkaya // Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya. 2010. № 4 (106). S. 7‒43.
  12. Habrieva T.YA. Pravo v usloviyah cifrovoj real’nosti // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2018. № 1. S. 85‒102.
  13. Halin V.G., Chernova G.V. Cifrovizaciya i ee vliyanie na rossijskuyu ekonomiku i obshchestvo: preimushchestva, vyzovy, ugrozy i riski // Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. 2018. № 10. S. 46‒63.
  14. Kak izuchat’ zhertv prestuplenij? / A.M. Verkeev, V.V. Volkov, A.V. Dmitrieva i dr. // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny. 2019. № 2. S. 4‒31. URL: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.2.01 (data obrashcheniya: 10.08.2019).
  15. Lebedev V.M. Doklad Predsedatelya VS RF Lebedeva V.M. na soveshchanii-seminare sudej sudov obshchej yurisdikcii i arbitrazhnyh sudov (Moskva, 12 fevralya 2019 g.). URL: http://www.supcourt.ru/press_center/video_archive/27607/ (data obrashcheniya: 27.12.2019).
  16. Lovcov D.A., Niesov V.A. Sistemnaya modernizaciya «cifrovogo» sudoproizvodstva // Gosudarstvo i pravo v novoj informacionnoj real’nosti. 2018. № 1. S. 67‒81. doi: 10.31249/pras/2018.01.04.
  17. Mishina E.A. Iz amerikanskogo opyta obespecheniya lichnoj nezavisimosti sudej // Zhurnal VSHE «Pravo». № 4. 2010. S. 119‒133.
  18. Momotov V.V. Vystuplenie predsedatelya Soveta sudej RF V.V. Momotova na plenarnom zasedanii VI Moskovskogo yuridicheskogo foruma po teme «Sudebnaya vlast’ v usloviyah sovremennyh cifrovyh tekhnologij» 4 aprelya 2019 g. URL: http://www.ssrf.ru/news/vystuplieniia-intierv-iu-publikatsii/32548 (data obrashcheniya: 12.09.2019).
  19. Opros VCIOM «Ocenka deyatel’nosti sudov v RF». Moskva, noyabr’ 2007 g. URL: https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=228 (data obrashcheniya: 23.12.2019).
  20. Opros Fonda «Obshchestvennoe mnenie» «Spravedlivost’ ne torzhestvuet». Opublikovan 25 noyabrya 2011 g. URL: https://fom.ru/obshchestvo/10263 (data obrashcheniya: 17.08.2019).
  21. Opros Levada-centra «Prava cheloveka». Opublikovan 20 noyabrya 2019 g. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2019/11/20/prava-cheloveka/ (data obrashcheniya: 21.12.2019).
  22. Opros nezavisimogo issledovatel’skogo centra «Otnoshenie rossiyan k sudebnoj sisteme (itogi vserossijskogo oprosa)». Opublikovan 1 marta 2018 g. URL: http://xn----7sbfhedbrfkjgf7af6bcairj9fsg.xn--p1ai/otnoshenie-rossiyan-k-sudebnoj-sisteme-itogi-vserossijskogo-oprosa/?ckattempt=2 (data obrashcheniya: 25.11.2019).
  23. Otchet XI Vserossijskomu s»ezdu sudej o deyatel’nosti sudebnogo departamenta pri Verhovnom sude RF za 2013‒2016 gody. Utverzhden resheniem kollegii Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verhovnom sude RF ot 08.11.2016 № 5/1-ksd.
  24. Otchet ob itogah deyatel’nosti sudebnogo departamenta pri Verhovnom sude RF za 2017 god. Utverzhden resheniem kollegii Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verhovnom sude RF ot 27.03.2018 g. № 2/1-ksd.
  25. Otchet ob itogah deyatel’nosti Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verhovnom sude RF za 2018 god. Utverzhden resheniem kollegii Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verhovnom sude RF ot 26.03.2019 g. № 3/1-ksd.
  26. Proekt rekomendacij Kruglogo stola «Nravstvennye aspekty osushchestvleniya pravosudiya». Obshchestvennaya palata. 10 sentyabrya 2013 g. URL: http://zagr.org/1422.html (data obrashcheniya: 09.01.2019).
  27. Prohoda V.A. Doverie rossiyan nacional’noj sudebno-pravovoj sisteme (po materialam sociologicheskogo issledovaniya) // Sociodinamika. 2019. № 5. S. 86‒94. doi: 10.25136/2409-7144.2019.5.29812 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=29812 (data obrashcheniya: 09.07.2019).
  28. Rimskij V.L. Kak ponimayut i kak ocenivayut real’nye praktiki spravedlivosti rossijskie grazhdane // Doklad. IV Sociologicheskaya Grushinskaya konferenciya. 2016. URL: https://wciom.ru/fileadmin/file/nauka/grusha2016/doklady/3.4_rimskiy.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.11.2019).
  29. Rimskij V.L. Spravedlivost’ v sovremennoj Rossii: mechty i ispol’zovanie v social’nyh praktikah // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. № 5. 2013. S. 27‒36.
  30. Savkina M.A. Doverie grazhdan k pravosudiyu: sostoyanie i perspektivy // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2013. № 6 (1). S. 317‒320.
  31. Sociologicheskij analiz pravosoznaniya sudej, naseleniya i predprinimatelej / pod red. G.A. Satarova. Moscow: Fond «Liberal’naya missiya», 2016. 176 s.
  32. Sulejmanova K.M. Pravo na sudebnuyu zashchitu i na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo // Yuridicheskaya nauka. № 1. 2017. S. 114‒117.
  33. Tarasov V.N. Ocenka grazhdanami deyatel’nosti sudov // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj Akademii MVD. 2014. № 4 (28). S. 299‒303.
  34. Transformaciya rossijskoj sudebnoj vlasti: Opyt kompleksnogo analiza / A.K. Gorbuz, M.A. Krasnov, E.A. Mishina, G.A. Satarov. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Norma. 2010.
  35. Vajpan V.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie cifrovoj ekonomiki // Predprinimatel’skoe pravo. Prilozhenie «Pravo i Biznes». 2018. № 1. S. 12‒17.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Voskresensky F., Timchenko A., 2020

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##