Ideological myths of European union on the example of Laeken declaration

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

The European Council adopted Laeken Declaration in which it was first stated about EU aspiration to take the lead on world globalization together with USA. The subject of this study is the analysis of myths and ideological cliches of Laeken Declaration by which EU and USA legitimize their foreign policy.

The author concludes that the future of EU was not as optimistic as stated in the text of the declaration. Until recently, the EU was a state in the process of formation, and its legal area acquired the features of a domestic order. These processes have slowed down now. An external challenge was the change in the format of relations with Russia, which openly declared its national interests and cooperation only as a equal partner. Previously unthinkable social problems appeared in the “space of well-being”.

The history of Russia teaches that “going to Europe” can be done in different ways. The path of “european integration” put the Russian state on the brink of complete disintegration of the late XXth century. The consequences of this choice are currently being overcome in the framework of Eurasian integration and integration with states outside the post-Soviet space that have common interests with Russia.

作者简介

Alexey Novoseltsev

Far Eastern Federal University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: novoseltsev.alexey@yahoo.com
SPIN 代码: 6724-9025
http://msun.ru/dir/edu/tc/ru-ru/employees/93432

PhD in Law, Assosiate professor of the Department of Public and Private International Law

俄罗斯联邦, 8 Sukhanova St., Vladivostok, Russia, 690950

参考

  1. Budushchee Evropejskogo Soyuza (Laakenskaya deklaraciya / deklaraciya Laakena). URL: https://eulaw.edu.ru/spisok-dokumentov-po-pravu-evropejskogo-soyuza/instituty-i-organy-evropejskogo-soyuza/budushhee-evropejskogo-soyuza-laakenskaya-deklaratsiya-deklaratsiya-laakena/ (data obrashcheniya: 17.03.2020).
  2. Dogovor o Evropejskom Soyuze. Podpisan v g. Maastrihte 07.02.1992 (s izm. i dop. ot 13.12.2007). URL: http://base.garant.ru/2566557/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.03.2020).
  3. Dorskaya A.A., Dorskij A.A. Mezhdunarodnye integracionnye organizacii i problema formirovaniya nadnacional’nogo prava // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2016. № 4. S. 105–110.
  4. Ebzeev B.S. Globalizaciya i stanovlenie transnacional’nogo konstitucionalizma // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2017. № 1. S. 5–15.
  5. Fromm E. Anatomiya chelovecheskoj destruktivnosti. Moscow: AST-LTD, 1998. 672 s.
  6. Gorbachev M.S. Politicheskij doklad CK KPSS XXVII s”ezdu partii. Razdel I. Sovremennyj mir: osnovnye tendencii i protivorechiya. URL: http://lib.ru/MEMUARY/GORBACHEV/doklad_xxvi.txt (data obrashcheniya: 20.03.2020).
  7. Grot A. Dogovor o svobodnoj torgovle — evropejskoe oruzhie massovogo unichtozheniya. URL: https://scepsis.net/library/id_1744.html (data obrashcheniya: 28.03.2020).
  8. Zaklyuchitel’nyj akt Soveshchaniya po bezopasnosti i sotrudnichestvu v Evrope. Deklaraciya principov, kotorymi gosudarstva-uchastniki budut rukovodstvovat’sya vo vzaimnyh otnosheniyah. III. Nerushimost’ granic. Moskva, 1 avgusta 1975 g. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1901862 (data obrashcheniya: 06.04.2020).
  9. Kashkin S.Yu. Stanovlenie nauki integracionnogo prava i interesy Rossii v globaliziruyushchemsya mire // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2017. № 5. S. 6–20.
  10. Komnin A. Kak byvshie respubliki SSSR stanovyatsya koloniyami TNK. URL: https://mk-kz.kz/politics/2019/10/30/kak-byvshie-respubliki-sssr-stanovyatsya-koloniyami-tnk.html (data obrashcheniya: 27.03.2020).
  11. Kosachev K.I. «Myagkaya sila» s zhestkimi posledstviyami // Rossijskij zhurnal pravovyh issledovanij. 2016. № 1. S. 15–20.
  12. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava. T. 7. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye formy integracionnyh processov v sovremennom mire. Moscow: Nauka, 1993.
  13. Lenin V.I. O lozunge Soedinennyh Shtatov Evropy. Social-Demokrat. № 44. 23 avgusta 1915 g. URL: https://www.marxists.org/russkij/marx/1873/08/10a.htm (data obrashcheniya: 27.03.2020).
  14. Myunhenskaya rech’ Vladimira Putina 10 fevralya 2007 goda. Stenogramma. Polnyj tekst. URL: https://introvertum.com/myunhenskaya-rech-vladimira-putina-10-fevralya-2007-goda-stenogramma-polnyiy-tekst/ (data obrashcheniya: 23.03.2020).
  15. Novosel’cev A.Yu. Pravo nadgosudarstvennyh obrazovanij: monografiya. Vladivostok: MGU im. adm. G.I. Nevel’skogo, 2016. 60 s.
  16. Pozhidaev E. Cena sblizheniya s Zapadom: opyt Bolgarii dlya postsovetskih stran. URL: http://www.regnum.ru/news/polit/11641068.html#ixzz2Ouf14UpJ (data obrashcheniya: 15.04.2019).
  17. Poslanie Prezidenta Federal’nomu Sobraniyu [Elektronnyj resurs]: Moskva, Kreml’, 15 yanvarya 2020 g. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/62582 (data obrashcheniya: 30.03.2020).
  18. Postanovlenie VS RF ot 12 dekabrya 1991 goda № 2014-1. «O ratifikacii Soglasheniya o sozdanii Sodruzhestva Nezavisimyh Gosudarstv» // Vedomosti SND i VS RF. 19.12.1991. № 51. St. 1798.
  19. Rezolyuciya General’noj Assamblei OON № A/RES/68/262 ot 27.03.2014 goda «O territorial’noj celostnosti Ukrainy». URL: https://russian.rt.com/article/25579 (data obrashcheniya: 18.06.19).
  20. Rezolyuciya PASE № 14130 «O politicheskih posledstviyah agressii Rossii v Ukraine». URL: https://izvestia.kiev.ua/item/show/95689 (data obrashcheniya: 18.06.19).
  21. Semiryaga M.I. Tyuremnaya imperiya nacizma i ee krah. Moscow: Yurid. lit., 1991. 384 s.
  22. Talalaev A.N. Hel’sinki: principy i real’nost’. Moscow: Yurid. lit., 1985. 192 s.
  23. Vystuplenie ministra inostrannyh del Rossii S.V. Lavrova v hode vstrechi so slushatelyami i professorsko-prepodavatel’skim sostavom Diplomaticheskoj Akademii MID Rossii. Moskva, 12 aprelya 2019 g. // Diplomaticheskaya sluzhba. 2019. № 3. S. 6–11.
  24. Yakunin V.I. Ideologicheskie klishe i mify kak instrument vneshnej politiki SSHA // Rossijskij zhurnal pravovyh issledovanij. 2018. № 1. S. 9–19.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Novoseltsev A., 2020

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用-禁止演绎 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##