Binding Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on the Transformation of Russian Legislation in the Era of Digitalization

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

On the basis of the analysis of the law enforcement practice of foreign countries and the doctrinal views of foreign researchers, this article examines the question behind national authorities’ trust in the broad interpretation by the European Court of Human Rights of the provisions of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

The challenges in the digital progress force legislators to pay increasing attention to the implementation of the interests of his own country, contrary to the approaches demonstrated in other countries. Implementing the “road maps” of socially significant projects is impossible due to the rejected priorities of Russia’s domestic policy.

The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation has the legitimate right to defend the internal logic of the protectionist measures of the national authorities protecting the economic foundations of society, the priorities of its social policy, and the security of the state.

About the authors

Andrey A. Tymoshenko

University of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: antim1@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2562-0022
SPIN-code: 6085-1278

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Department

Russian Federation, 117638, Moscow, ul. Azovskaya, 2, bldg.1

References

  1. Komshukova OV. Politicheskaya argumentaciya v resheniyah Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii: analiz Postanovleniya ot 14 iyulya 2015 goda № 21-P. Sravnitel'noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie. 2019;(3):110–126. (In Russ.).
  2. Petrov AA. Pravovoe kachestvo reshenij Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii: postanovka voprosa i nekotorye prakticheskie problem. Sravnitel'noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie. 2014;(2): 95–110. (In Russ.).
  3. Klug F. Values for a Godless Age. London: Penguin, 2000. 304 p.
  4. Donald A, Gordon J, Leach P. The UK and the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights & Social Justice Research Institute, London metropolitan university. London, 2012. P. 138–140.
  5. Gerasimova EV, Shirinyan SV. Postanovleniya Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka v pravovoj sisteme Federativnoj Respubliki Germaniya. Vestnik Baltijskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki. 2017;(2):5–11. (In Russ.).
  6. Karpovich OG. Problemy neispolneniya reshenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka: teoriya i praktika. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2020;(4):17–21. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2022 Tymoshenko A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies