Approaches to the analysis of visual culture: "reading" and "vision"

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is devoted to the description and opposition of culturological approaches to the perception and analysis of visual culture phenomena based either on "reading" the visual as a text, or on a special experience of its "visibility", fundamentally different from the experience of "reading" (which is designated in the article as a "desemiotic" approach). The first approach is implemented within the framework of semiotics, where the visual is really considered as a text, a system of signs, or even a language that can be analyzed through interpretation, search and isolation of meaning. The second approach arises under the influence of post-structuralist criticism of semiotics, interest in what is "hidden behind structures" and does not lend itself to semiotic reading: the visual is considered here as a special affecting experience that escapes from a fixed meaning. To analyze, disclose and contrast the selected cultural approaches, the article uses a comparative typological method. The main theoretical aspects of the semiotic approach to the analysis of the visual based on the work of R. Barthes "Rhetoric of the image", as well as the directions based on this methodology: visual semiotics and visual rhetoric are considered. A brief description of the "desemiotic" approach is given: the difference between visual and language and text is asserted, the semiotic approach is criticized for its limitations and some incompleteness. The focus of attention shifts to a different, direct, sensual, affective perception of the visual, or to the range of social effects that it produces: its cultural and political functions, the ability to be a cultural representation, to construct relationships with the perceiving subject. The approach is presented on the example of the works of such researchers as W. Mitchell, J. Elkins, H. U. Humbrecht, N. Mirzoeff, I. Rogoff.

References

  1. Patton, T. O. Visual Rhetoric. Handbook of Visual Communication Theory, Methods, and Media. New York: Routledge, 2020. 518 p.
  2. Мирзоев, Н. Как смотреть на мир. М.: Музей современного искусства «Гараж», 2019. 344 с.
  3. Mitchell, W. Picture Theory. Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994. 462 p.
  4. Boehm, G. Die Wiederkehr der Bilder: Was ist ein Bild? München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1994. 458 s.
  5. Маслов В.М. Философия визуального поворота: от теории к практике // Философская мысль. 2019. № 12. С. 39-56. doi: 10.25136/2409-8728.2019.12.31335 URL: https://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_31335.html
  6. Бахманн-Медик, Д. Культурные повороты. Новые ориентиры в науках о культуре. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2017. 504 c.
  7. Rorty, R. The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992. 416 p.
  8. Веселкова Н. В. Методологические ориентиры визуальных исследований // Документ. Архив. История. Современность. Вып. 17. Екатеринбург: Урал. ун-та, 2017. С. 303-323.
  9. Соссюр, Ф. Курс общей лингвистики. М.: Ленанд, 2023. 256 с.
  10. Пирс, Ч. Избранные философские произведения. М.: Логос, 2000. 412 с.
  11. Барт Р. Избранные работы: Семиотика. М.: Поэтика, 1994. С. 297-318.
  12. Bachand, D. The art of (in) advertising: From poetry to prophecy. Montreal: Guernica, 1994. Pp. 133-150.
  13. Santaella-Braga, M. L. For a classification of visual signs // Semiotica, № 70, 1988. Pp. 59-78.
  14. Saint-Martin, F. Semiotics of visual language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990. 276 p.
  15. Sonesson, G. Pictorial concepts: Inquiries into the semiotic heritage and its relevance for the analysis of the visual world. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press, 1989. 369 p.
  16. Danesi, M. Visual Rhetoric and Semiotic. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, 2017. URL: https://bartelswrt105.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/0/1/120154901/danesi.pdf (дата обращения: 29.04.2024)
  17. Blakesley, D. Brooke, C. Introduction: Notes on Visual Rhetoric. Enculturation.net, 2001. URL: https://enculturation.net/3_2/introworkscited.html (дата обращения: 08.05.2024)
  18. Odell, L. Katz, S. Writing in a Visual Age. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2005. 752 p.
  19. Сонтаг, С. Против интерпретации и другие эссе. М.: Ад Маргинем, 2024. 368 с.
  20. Curtis, N. The Pictorial Turn. London: Routledge, 1992. 256 p.
  21. Mitchell, W. What do pictures want? Interview. Center for Visual Studies. URL: https://visual-studies.com/interviews/mitchell.html (дата обращения: 10.05.2024)
  22. Elkins, J. Visual studies: a skeptical introduction. London: Routledge, 2003. 240 p.
  23. Гумбрехт Х.У. Производство присутствия: Чего не может передать значение. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2006. 184 с.
  24. Mirzoeff, N. An Introduction to Visual Culture. London: Routledge, 2023. 328 p.
  25. Rogoff, I. Studying Visual Culture. The Visual Culture Reader. 3rd Edition. London: Routledge, 2012. P. 24-36.
  26. Purgar, K. W.J.T. Mitchell's Image Theory Living Pictures. New York: Routledge, 2016. 268 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).