"Human or artificial intelligence?": an empirical study of respondents' declared preferences in digital graphics
- Authors: Solomentseva S.B.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 37-49
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2409-8744/article/view/364172
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GATRNB
- ID: 364172
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Currently, technologies based on the use of artificial intelligence are being integrated into most spheres of life in modern society, which determines the relevance of the research topic. The initial stages of this movement were associated with solving problems of optimizing routine processes, but recently there has been a tendency to introduce innovative neural network practices in such areas as culture and art, which were considered the prerogative of man. The purpose of this work is to experimentally identify respondents' declared preferences between digital graphic works created by humans and artificial intelligence. This will allow us to give an objective assessment of the potential of generative technologies, their ability to compete with copyrighted works, as well as the degree of influence on the vectors of further development of the field of artistic creativity and creative design. A target group of 62 respondents with artistic skills was formed for the empirical study. The data was collected based on the method of declared preferences using Google Forms. The methods of quantitative statistical analysis were used during the performance analysis stage. Currently, there are no formalized criteria for evaluating the quality of digital images. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that, based on the results of an analysis of the opinions of qualified survey participants, their emotional perception of artistic works and existing practical experience, the announced preferences between graphic works created by humans and artificial intelligence were determined for the first time. In general, respondents demonstrated a commitment to digital author projects with a score of 55.5% (the answer is "yes" – 20.3%, the answer is "rather yes" – 35.2%), while illustrations developed using generative technologies received 44.5% (the answer is "yes" – 13.5%, the answer is "rather yes" – 31.0%). The results obtained can be of theoretical and practical importance for artists and designers, researchers and teaching staff of educational institutions providing training in creative areas of training. A timely response to large-scale changes in society, when basic concepts of art are undergoing transformation, will allow rethinking the algorithms for creating digital graphic works and introducing new forms of organizing the creative process.
About the authors
Svetlana Borisovna Solomentseva
Email: ss00001@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2442-1235
References
Михайлова Е. Ю., Камальдинова З. Ф. К вопросу применения искусственного интеллекта // Цифровые технологии: настоящее и будущее: Сборник статей Национальной научно-практической конференции с международным участием. Тольятти: Тольяттинская академия управления, 2022. С. 202-211. Замчалова И. Ю. Искусственный интеллект: риски и перспективы культуры // Интеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции. 2023. № 5. С. 102-110. doi: 10.25198/2077-7175-2023-5-102. Choi Suk Kyoung, DiPaola Steve, Gabora Liane. Art and the artificial // Journal of Creativity. 2023. Volume 33, Issue 3. doi: 10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100069. Ван К. Искусственный интеллект и будущие пути развития искусства // Культура и цивилизация. 2023. Т. 13, № 7-1. С. 146-153. doi: 10.34670/AR.2023.20.64.020. Latikka Rita. Bergdahl Jenna, Savela Nina, Oksanen Atte. AI as an Artist? A Two-Wave Survey Study on Attitudes Toward Using Artificial Intelligence in Art // Poetics. 2023. Volume 101. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101839. Li Hong, Xue Tao, Zhang Aijia, Luo Xuexing, Kong Lingqi, Huang Guanghui. The application and impact of artificial intelligence technology in graphic design: A critical interpretive synthesis // Heliyon. 2024. Volume 10, Issue 21. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40037. Бохоров К. Ю. Концептуальные подходы к творческому потенциалу технологий «искусственного интеллекта» в видеоарте // Инновационные технологии в кинематографе, медиаиндустрии и образовании: Материалы и доклады IX Всероссийской научно-практической конференции. Москва: ООО «КУНА», 2022. С. 64-71. Li Yu. «Will artificial intelligence platforms replace designers in the future?» analyzing the impact of artificial intelligence platforms on the engineering design industry through color perception // Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2024. Volume 10, Part A. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109369. Zhao Yan. The synergistic effect of artificial intelligence technology in the evolution of visual communication of new media art // Heliyon. 2024. Volume 10, Issue 18. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38008. Yim Iris Heung Yue. Artificial intelligence literacy in primary education: An arts-based approach to overcoming age and gender barriers // Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2024. Volume 7. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100321. Fan Xiaoying, Zhong Xianghu. Artificial intelligence-based creative thinking skill analysis model using human-computer interaction in art design teaching // Computers and Electrical Engineering. 2022. Volume 100. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107957. Шольц Г. ChatGPT и устранение человека // Семиотические исследования. 2024. Т. 4, № 3. С. 8-13. doi: 10.18287/2782-2966-2024-4-3-8-13. Родькин П. Е. Искусство и искусственный интеллект: вопросы, которые необходимо поставить // Техническая эстетика и дизайн-исследования. 2024. Т. 6, № 2. С. 117-126. Васерчук Ю. А., Куценко Р. Г. Экспертная оценка произведений искусства в эпоху социальных сетей и Интернета // Академический вестник УралНИИпроект РААСН. 2021. № 2(49). С. 86-90. doi: 10.25628/UNIIP.2021.49.2.015. Булгакова И. А., Чурин А. С. Критерии искусства в искусственном интеллекте // Художественное образование и наука. 2023. № 4(37). С. 36-43. doi: 10.36871/hon.202304036. Егорова Л. Г. Методы объявленных предпочтений: описание методологии и примеры использования. Москва: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2018. 64 с. Clauberg R. A conceptual analysis of the opportunities and risks of artificial intelligence for all parts of the economy // Вестник Института мировых цивилизаций. 2022. Vol. 13, No. 3(36). P. 77-85. Oksanen Atte, Cvetkovic Anica, Akin Nalan, Latikka Rita, Bergdahl Jenna, Chen Yang, Savela Nina. Artificial intelligence in fine arts: A systematic review of empirical research // Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. 2024. Volume 1, Issue 2. doi: 10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004. Messer Uwe. Co-creating art with generative artificial intelligence: Implications for artworks and artists // Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. 2024. Volume 2, Issue 1. doi: 10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100056. Момуналиев С. М., Оморкулов А. М. Искусственный интеллект в искусстве. Творчество в эпоху искусственного разума // Alatoo Academic Studies. 2024. № 2. С. 74-84. doi: 10.17015/aas.2024.242.06. Rabina E. I., Kildiyarova L. S. The use of a neural network in contempopary fine art // «Human+ 2023»: Материалы II Международной научно-практической конференции. Магнитогорск: Магнитогорский государственный технический университет им. Г.И. Носова, 2024. С. 110-117. Маркиш А. В. Искусственный интеллект в современном искусстве // Искусство и культура. 2024. № 2(54). С. 21-25.
Supplementary files
