The connection between esotericism and science, or how the second "parasitizes" the first. Science as a reproducible quantum entanglement of the real trajectory and trajectory of thinking
- Authors: Strigin M.B.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 6 (2024)
- Pages: 170-184
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2409-8744/article/view/363540
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OCHGTO
- ID: 363540
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper shows that esotericism is the area of bifurcation of knowledge in which new trajectories of thinking are born. Further, in accordance with the principle of Occam's Razor, some of them are eliminated as not corresponding to the principle of least action. The rest move into the field of regular science. It is shown that our world is a system of nested resonators, which is consistent with Descartes' idea that the world is built from a hierarchy of vortices. This also explains the great importance of boundary conditions in mathematics, since the boundaries of the resonator define the shape of the vortex. At the same time, the discreteness of energy, which is a characteristic feature of all quantum processes, becomes clear, since only isolated structures can persistently exist in the resonator. The general wave function of an entity is proposed as the product of a number of wave functions corresponding to each scale of the Universe. A model is proposed in accordance with which knowledge becomes scientific when the trajectory of thinking and the real trajectory of the system correlate with each other. A model is proposed in accordance with which knowledge becomes scientific when the trajectory of thinking and the real trajectory of the system correlate with each other. This correlation is built using mathematical signs. Since both the real trajectory and the trajectory of thinking are cyclical, their synchronization indicates the quantum entanglement of the real and the symbolic. The Jungian concept of synchronicity is being clarified. At any moment, by explicating a sequence of signs, we reproduce reality. All particles are entangled with each other to varying degrees. Therefore, the task of the experimenter is not to create entanglement, but rather to disentangle the object of study so that it can be studied autonomously.
Keywords
References
Аль-Халили Дж. Квант. М.: «РИПОЛ классик» // «Панглосс», 2019. Арнольд В. И. Математические методы классической механики. – М.: Наука. Гл. ред. физ. – мат. лит., 1989. – 472 с. Докинз Р. Эгоистичный ген. – М.: Издательство АСТ: CORPUS, 2017. – 512 с. Кассирер Э. Философия символических форм. Том 1. Язык. – М.; СПб.: Центр гуманитарных инициатив, 2017. – 272 с. Клышко Д. Н. Простой метод приготовления чистых состояний оптического поля, реализации эксперимента Эйнштейна, Подольского, Розена и демонстрации принципа дополнительности. Успехи физических наук, Т. 154, вып. 1. 1988. С. 133-152. Кун Т. Структура научных революций. – М.: Издательство АСТ, 2015. – 320 с. Маслоброд С.Н. Эффект дальней связи между прорастающими семенами, возникающий при их контакте в период набухания. // Электронная обработка материалов. 6(48). 2012. С. 99-113. Петренко В. Ф. Супрун А. П. Методологические пересечения психосемантики сознания и квантовой физики. – М.: КРАСАНД, 2018. – 304 с. Пименов Р.И Основы теории темпорального универсума. – Сыктывкар, 1991. – 193 с. Стригин М. Б. Топология социального, или Диаграммы метафизики мышления. От когнитивности атома до мирового разума/ Под ред. А.В. Маркова и Е.С. Степченко – СПб.: Издательство РХГА, 2022. 410 с. Шредингер Э. Избранные труды по квантовой механике. Классики науки. – М.: Книга по требованию, 2013. – 422 с. Юнг К. Г. Синхронистичность: акаузальный объединяющий принцип. М.: Рефл-бук, К.: Ваклер, 1997. 313 с.
Supplementary files
