The Family of Philip II of Macedon: the culturological approach of ancient authors
- Authors: Sivkina N.Y.1, Borisova E.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 142-151
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2409-8744/article/view/363427
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LVSTOC
- ID: 363427
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Philip II of Macedon had an unprecedented number of interethnic marriages and seven children born in these unions. His matrimonial activity met the requirements of politics. However, the works of ancient authors contain a large amount of contradictory information concerning the family of Philip II. Attempts by ancient historians to retrospectively explain the situation of the royal children and wives often make it difficult to recreate the true picture of what happened. The ancient authors were representatives of a different culture, a different era, different from the time of Philip's reign. Therefore, modern researchers still do not have a single opinion regarding the marital relations of the Macedonian king and his family, which confirms the relevance of this topic. The purpose of this article is to clarify the role of members of the royal family at the court of Philip, and the factors that influenced their participation in political affairs. The theoretical basis of the research is the works of Athenaeus, Plutarch, Pompey Trog and Diodorus Siculus, as well as the works of modern authors. The methods of analysis and synthesis, the method of systematization of materials, as well as the comparative historical method and the method of studying cultural memory were used in the work. For the first time, the article attempts to consider the history of the family of Philip of Macedon, systematizing all available references in the sources. In addition, the authors analyze the material in the context of the ancient perception of the world. As a result of the study, the authors came to the conclusion that all ancient historians were not only influenced by Greek customs and customs and the traditional dichotomy of "Hellenes-barbarians", but also wrote their works under the impression of contemporary political events. These circumstances influenced the desire of historians to rationalize and explain the events that took place in the family of the Macedonian king. The culturological approach allowed the ancient authors to focus only on important events from their point of view, which did not always correspond to reality.
About the authors
Nataliya Yurievna Sivkina
Email: natalia-sivkina@yandex.ru
Elizaveta Yur'evna Borisova
Email: elizaveta_borisova20@mail.ru
References
Борисова Е. Ю., Сивкина Н. Ю. Правление Филиппа II Македонского: новый взгляд на периодизацию // Studia Humanitatis. 2021. № 1. Режим доступа: http://st-hum.ru/content/borisova-eyu-sivkina-nyu-pravlenie-filippa-ii-makedonskogo-novyy-vzglyad-na-periodizaciyu Киляшова К. А. Брачная политика царей династии Аргеадов. Проблема полигамии // Университетский научный журнал. 2018. № 38. С. 240-248. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34973082. Сивкина Н. Ю. Эллинизация Македонии в IV–III вв. до н. э.: к вопросу о политическом аспекте объективного процесса // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н. И. Лобачевского. 2012. № 6 (3). С. 157-167. Маринович А. П. Античная цивилизация и варвары / отв. ред. Л. П. Маринович; Ин-т всеобщ, истории РАН. М.: Наука, 2006. 355 с. Попов А. А. Историософские воззрения Помпея Трога в XLI книге Юстина // Вестник СПбГИК. 2016. №2 (27). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/istoriosofskie-vozzreniya-pompeya-troga-v-xli-knige-yustina Тыжов А. Я. Полибий и его «Всеобщая история» // Полибий. Всеобщая история. Т.1. СПб.: «Наука», «Ювента», 1994. С. 5-34. Уортингтон Йен Филипп II Македонский / пер. с англ. С. В. Иванова. СПб.–М.: Евразия – ИД Клио, 2018. 400 с. Hammond N. G. Philip of Macedon. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994. 235 p. Tronson A. Satyrus the Peripatetic and the Marriages of Philip II // The Journal of Hellenic Studies. 1984. Vol. 104. P. 116-126. Walbank F.W. Monarchies and monarchic ideas // The Cambridge Ancient History. 1984. VII. P. 62-100. Carney E. D. Alexander and Persian women // The American Journal of Philology. 1996. Vol. 117. № 4. P. 563-583. Carney E. D. Olimpias and the image of the virago // Phoenix. 1993. Vol. 47, № 1. P. 29-55. Carney E. D. The career of Adea-Euriduce // Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 1987. Bd. 36, H. 4. P. 496-502. Carney E. D. The sisters of Alexander the Great: Royal Relicts // Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte. 1988. Bd. 37, H. 4. P. 385-404. Carney E. D. Women and Monarchy in Macedonia. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2000. 384 с. Funke P. Philippos III. Arrhidaios und Alexandros IV. «von Amun auserwählt» // Gerion Anejos. 2005. Vol. IX. P. 45-56. Шофман А. С. Восточная политика Александра Македонского. Казань: Изд-во Казанск. ун-та, 1976. 520 с. Bosworth A. B. Conquest and Empire: The Reign of Alexander the Great / A. B. Bosworth. Cambridge–N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 330 p. Green, P. Alexander of Macedon, 356–323 B. C.: a historical biography. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press, 1991. 617 p. Гафуров Б. Г., Цибукидис Д. И. Александр Македонский и Восток. М.: «Наука», 1980. 456 с. Carney E. D. Oikos Keeping: Women and Monarchy in the Macedonian Tradition // A Companion to Women in the Ancient World. 2012. P. 304-314. Вершинин Л. Р. К вопросу об обстоятельствах заговора против Филиппа II Македонского // Вестник древней истории. 1990. № 1. С. 139-153. Сивкина Н. Ю. Мифологизация и рационализация образа знаменитой царицы Македонии // Исторический журнал: научные исследования. 2022. № 1. С. 48-55.
Supplementary files
