Photography and non-fiction pre-revolutionary cinema

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to identify the essence of cinema in the process of its formation in the pre–revolutionary period of time in comparison with its predecessor - photography. The author examines in detail the main properties of photography and the main properties of cinema, which do not coincide with each other, as well as their functioning in pre-revolutionary Russian society. The use of photography in mass illustrated magazines of that time is analyzed. Attention is paid to the formation of the properties of cinema at an early stage, when the audience of the first illusions was still mastering the perception of a new spectacle, which at the same time led to mastering the ability to read the language of screen reality. It is emphasized that mass cinema, in fact, used and developed the techniques of mass illustrated magazines. The special properties of cinematography related to the qualities of photogeny are also considered. The available documents on the functioning of the first cinemas are being studied. The issue of the emergence of the alienation effect in application to pre-revolutionary cinema, which leads to the mythologization of screen images, is discussed. The questions posed are studied on the basis of the art historical research method using the historical analysis of the available facts. What is new in this work is that the studied properties of photography and cinematography at an early stage allow us to develop the results obtained on the process of using archival photo and film documents in the modern cinematographic process. On the basis of the conducted research, it was found that cinematography, in comparison with photography, has the property of serving to identify the lost historical reality with giving the on-screen reality the qualities of myth, since there are no reliable verification techniques for visual paintings on the cinema screen. Photography reproduces mirrored pictures of existence with a demonstration of the smallest details and details, but cinema overshadows it due to its inherent photogeny, which does not have adequate verbal descriptions. Cinematic photogeny helps to reproduce the breath of life itself on the screen. In the course of the work, the empirical properties of photography and cinematography were studied with the disclosure of certain important historical circumstances that help to better understand their functioning in society.The results obtained contribute to a better understanding and decoding of pre-revolutionary film documents.

References

  1. Сонтаг С. О фотографии. – М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2021. – 272 с.
  2. Смородина В. А. Документальная фотография в российских иллюстрированных изданиях периода Первой мировой войны (1914-1917 гг.) : дис. … канд. филол. наук : 10.01.10. – Санкт-Петербург, 2000. – 250 с.
  3. Баллаш Б. Видимый человек. – М. : Всероссийский Пролеткульт, 1925. – 88 с.
  4. Горький М. (M. Pacatus) Синематограф Люмьера // Нижегородский листок. 1896, 4 июля. С. 3.
  5. Булгакова О. Л. ЛЕФ и кино // Киноведческие записки. – 1993. – № 18. – С. 165-197.
  6. Барт Р. Camera lucida. Комментарий к фотографии. – М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2016. – 192 с.
  7. Изволов Н. А. Феномен кино: История и теория. – М.: Материк, 2005. – 164 с.
  8. Михайлов В. П. Рассказы о кинематографе старой Москвы. – М.: Материк, 1998. – 292 с.
  9. Сальникова Е. В. Феномен визуального. От древних истоков к началу XXI века: монография. – М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2012. – 575 с.
  10. Устюгова В. В. «Кинематограф аттракционов» и его распространение в русской провинции на рубеже XIX–XX веков // Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н. И. Лобачевского. – 2016. – № 4. – С. 91-100.
  11. Янгиров Р. М. Другое кино: Статьи по истории отечественного кино первой трети ХХ века. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2011. – 416 с.
  12. Гращенкова И. Н., Фомин В. И. История российской кинематографии (1896-1940 гг.). – М.: Канон+ РООИ «Реабилитация», 2022. – 768 с.
  13. Недель А. Ю. Интимная идеология. Текст, кинематограф, цирк в российской культуре ХХ века. Монография. – СПб.: Алетейя, 2024. – 580 с.
  14. Сосна Н. Н. Фотография и образ: визуальное, непрозрачное, призрачное. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2011. – 200 с.
  15. Флюссер В. За философию фотографии. – СПб.: Издательство С.­Петерб. ун­та, 2008. – 146 с.
  16. Youngblood D. J. The Magic Mirror: Moviemaking in Russia: 1908-1918. – Madison: Wisconsin Press, 1999. – 197 p.
  17. Chefranova O. The Tsar and The Kinematograf: Film as History and The Chronicle of the Russian Monarchy. Beyond the Screen: Institutions, Networks and Publics of Early Cinema. – London: John Libbey Publishing Ltd., 2016. – pp. 63-70.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).