Technosophy: methodological resources
- Authors: Pluzhnikova N.N.1, Saenko N.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 11 (2024)
- Pages: 91-101
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2409-8728/article/view/365217
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MELKQX
- ID: 365217
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article, addressing the processes of technical and technological renewal and transformation of modern culture, comprehensively analyzes the phenomenon of the emergence of a new branch of socio-cultural and scientific-philosophical knowledge – technosophy. Special attention is paid to the research and purposeful study of the changes taking place in private and general scientific and philosophical methodology after the emergence of technosophy and its consolidation as an independent field of knowledge about the world of technology surrounding man. The subject of the research is technosophy as a new branch of modern scientific and philosophical knowledge. Given the relevance and degree of elaboration of the research topic, we point out that the main problem of the study lies in the lack of a holistic understanding of this industry, as well as the heuristic significance of the methodological resources used by it in understanding the existence of man, society and culture. The methodological and theoretical basis of the research was a scientific and theoretical analysis of the history of philosophical thought, dialectical principles of development, objectivity and a concrete historical approach, which are of the most important methodological importance in the study of technosophy. The study uses general scientific principles of cognition in their concretization in relation to the study of society, as well as a comparative method for the study of technosophy. Technosophy is considered as a set of ways and approaches to reveal the essence of the processes of interaction between the person himself and the objects of technology created by him. It is noted that the modern cultural and historical era, in terms of acquiring new features, is marked by a radical change in the overall role and purpose of technical devices in human life and society. The authors consider the processes of updating and transforming the traditional scientific and philosophical methodology of studying and analyzing the world of technology from the point of view of forming a new cultural axiology, searching for solutions to problems related to this process. The authors conclude that Modern man and humanity, tightly surrounded by the technosphere they created from all sides, are entering an era of radical revision and changes in all the basic parameters of optimizing their own existence. In this regard, technosophy can act as a new branch of scientific and philosophical knowledge, describing not only these changes, but also the thinking of modern man.
Keywords
About the authors
Natalia Nikolaevna Pluzhnikova
Email: pluzhnikova@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4143-1216
Natalya Ryafikovna Saenko
Email: rilke@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9422-064X
References
Kurzweil R. The Age of Spiritual Machines. New York: Penguin Books, 1999. Эпштейн М. Н. Технософия и другие «софии» // Эпштейн М. Н. Знак пробела: о будущем гуманитарных наук. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2004. Эпштейн М. Debut de Siecle, или Oт Пост- к Прото-. Манифест нового века // Знамя. 2001. № 5. URL: https://znamlit.ru/publication.php?id=1435. (дата обращения: 21.10.2024). Лазаревич А.А. От технонауки к технософии: Контуры новой гуманитаристики // Проектирование будущего. Проблемы цифровой реальности: труды 2-й Международной конференции (7-8 февраля 2019 г., Москва). М.: ИПМ им. М.В.Келдыша, 2019. С. 42-50. Авдулов А. Н. 2000. 04. 001. Koatec Дж. Перспективы технологии на ближайшие 25 лет: возможности и риски. Coates J. The next twenty-five years of technology: opportunities and risks // 21st century technologies: promises and perils of dynamic future. – P.: OECD, 1998. – P. 33-46. Ковальчук М. В., Нарайкин О. С., Яцишина Е. Б. Конвергенция наук и технологий – новый этап научно-технического развития // Вопросы философии. 2013. № 3. С. 3-11. Кудрин Б. И. Технетика: новая парадигма философии техники (третья научная картина мира). Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 1998. Ellule J. La Revolution l’autre. Le gal techologique nouveau avec le Monde (Эллюль Ж. Другая революция // Новая технократическая волна на Западе). М.: Прогресс, 1986. С. 147-152. Глозман А.Б. Техника, технетика и биоэволюция // Вестник Моск. у-та. Сер. 7. № 5. 2010. С. 83-103. Юдин Б.Г. Наука в обществе знаний // Вопросы философии. 2010. № 8. С. 45-57. Beaglehole E. Evaluation Techniques for Induced Technological Change // International Social Science Bulletin, Vol. VII, No. 3 (1955). Pp. 376-386. Bernard L. Invention and Social Progress // "em"American Journal of Sociology"/em", Vol. 29 (July 1923). Pp. 1-33. Crozier M. La Civilisation technique. URL: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/jacques-ellul-the-technological-system (дата обращения: 14.01.2024). Fried J. The Social and Economic Role of Technicians // International Labour Review. Vol. 55 (June 2005). Pp. 512-537. Goodman L. "em"Man and Automation"/em". England: Penguin Books, 1957. Ellul J. "em"Présence au monde moderne"/em". Geneva: Roulet; 1948. URL: ttps://archive.org/details/presenceofkingdo0000ellu_i1p2/page/n7/mode/2up (дата обращения: 21.03.2024). "em""/em" Semal L. Bernard Charbonneau et Jacques Ellul, 2014, Nous sommes des révolutionnaires malgré nous. https://doi.org/10.4000/developpementdurable.11313. "em""/em" Ясперс К. Современная техника. Перевод на русский язык: М. И. Левина. Новая технократическая волна на Западе. Сборник статей. М., 1986 // Электронная публикация: Центр гуманитарных технологий. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/6331. (дата обращения: 23.09.2024) "em""/em" Эпштейн М. Техника-религия-гуманистика // Вопросы философии. 2009. № 12. С. 19-29. Денисова Т.Т. От философии техники – к технософии // Russian Studies in Culture and Society. 2019. № 6. С. 34-44. "em""/em" Samuelson P. Economics, an Introductory Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1991. "em" "/em"
Supplementary files
