Differences in the humanistic thoughts of Lu Xin and Leo Tolstoy

The subject of the study is the humanistic spirit of Tolstoy and Lu Xin. This study explores the differences between the Chinese writer and the Russian writer Lu Xin in the humanitarian spirit in the unique historical, traditional and cultural traditions of both sides. The object of the study is to compare the two main aspects of the humanistic spirit of Lu Xin and Tolstoy; a detailed analysis and comparison are made. The article analyzes the different views of the two writers on the subject of love in the humanitarian spirit, whether it is equal love or love for the weak, as well as different ways to combat evil, whether to use tolerant love to influence or to use violent means to calm down, and, finally, it is important to analyze the foresight and lagging humanitarian ideals. In this article, the research methods are cultural-historical, comparative-historical, and structural. This article uses text analysis, comparative research, and historical analysis to place Lu Xin and Tolstoy in a specific historical context and to conduct a comparative analysis of their humanitarian spirit by analyzing the works of Tolstoy and Lu Xin. The innovation of the article lies in the fact that the researcher compared two humanitarian ways of implementing "bloodthirsty revenge" and "not using violence to resist evil," analyzed differences in efficiency, reality and ideality, and discussed their ideological roots. The humanitarian ideals of Lu Xin and Tolstoy were analyzed. The outstanding contribution of the researcher is a detailed comparison of the differences in the humanitarian spiritual thoughts of the two writers from different points of view. The author's special contribution to this research topic is to place the two ideological giants in a specific historical context in order to compare their humanitarian thoughts, highlighting the humanitarian concerns contained in their criticism and denial. An in-depth analysis of the connotations of the concepts of "love for the weak" and "humanity" is carried out, and the arguments are combined with specific works by the two writers to make the comparison more convincing.

Lu Xun, Leo Tolstoy, humanism, Love for the weak, humanity, Bloodthirsty revenge, non-resistance to evil by violence, foresight, the backlog, literary comparison