Formation and psychological aspects of the journalistic interview

Abstract

The subject of theoretical research is the structural components of a journalistic interview. The purpose is to reveal the stages of the formation of a journalistic interview and analyze its content from the point of view of psychological effects (emotions, ideas about the subject of the interview). Five stages of the formation of the interview as an autonomous journalistic genre are considered. The main stages of such development are indicated as: 1. Interview-transcript, 2. Interview-quote, 3. Interview-questionnaire and 4. Interview-impression. The analysis is based on the content components of the interview and the main objectives of creating the text. The content and process of a modern interview is described within the framework of the Johari Window communicative model, four communicative spaces are described, the main vector of the interview development is indicated, as well as communicative tools for working with each of the allocated spaces. The research methodology is based on the principles of communication studies: the intentionality of mass media texts, information management, social constructivism (socio-psychological construction through media texts). The Johari Window model is used to describe the communicative processes of a modern journalistic interview. Within the framework of the model used, the interview is interpreted as a process of systemic expansion of the Arena space. It is concluded that the interview appears as a non-linear dialogue process with targeted psychological effects of emotional reactions of its participants, subjective interpretation of events and facts, as well as empathy (involvement) of the audience in the interview process. The study can be used for psychological analysis of interviews, as well as for educational purposes in the course "Media Psychology".

References

  1. Schudson M. The Power of News. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1995. 269 p.
  2. Atkinson P., Silverman D. Kundera’s Immortality: The Interview Society and the Invention of Self. Qualitative Inquiry// 1997. Vol. No. 3. pp. 324–345.
  3. Сильвермен Д. Что считать качественным исследованием? Предостерегающий комментарий // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 8. С. 44-51.
  4. Moberg U. Broadcast Talk: The Interview and its Hybrids// Ekström М., Kroon А., Nylund М. (eds) News from the Interview Society. Göteborg University: Nordicom, 2006. pp. 225-238.
  5. Osepashvili D. Transformation of Interview as a Journalistic Style Form (History of Interview)// Media & Mass Communication. 2014. Volume 3. pp. 44-48.
  6. Clayman S.E. Arenas of Interaction in the New Media Era// Ekström М., Kroon А., Nylund М. (eds) News from the Interview Society. Göteborg University: Nordicom, 2006. pp. 239-264.
  7. Carpenter S., Cepak A. & Peng Z. An Exploration of the Complexity of Journalistic Interviewing Competencies// Journalism Studies, № 19 (5), 2018. pp. 2283-2303, doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1338155
  8. Chagas V. Grassroots journalists, citizen historians: the interview as journalistic genre and history methodology// Oral History, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2012, pp. 59-68.
  9. Ekström M. Interviewing, Quoting and the Development of Modern News Journalism. A Study of the Swedish Press 1915-1995// Ekström М., Kroon А., Nylund М. (eds) News from the Interview Society. Göteborg University: Nordicom, 2006. pp. 21-48.
  10. Дебор Г. Общество спектакля / пер. с фр. C. Офертаса и М. Якубович. – М.: Логос, 1999. – 224 с.
  11. Пайн Д., Гилмор Д. Экономика впечатлений: Как превратить покупку в захватывающее действие / Б. Джозеф Пайн II, Джеймс Х. Гилмор; Пер с англ. – М. : Альпина Паблишер, 2018. – 382 с.
  12. Schulze G. Die Erlebnisgesellschaft. Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag, s. 612
  13. Погорлецкий А. И. Впечатления как новый продукт развития экономики и общества// Экономика. Налоги. Право. 2022. №2.
  14. Nielsen М.F. ‘Doing’ Interviewer Roles in TV Interviews // Ekström М., Kroon А., Nylund М. (eds) News from the Interview Society. Göteborg University: Nordicom, 2006. pp. 95-120.
  15. Drake К.Е. The psychology of interrogative suggestibility: A vulnerability during interview// Personality and Individual Differences. № 49. 2010. pp. 683–688.
  16. Болатханова К. Р. Практика применения когнитивного интервью для работы с подозреваемым// Научный журнал. 2016. №12 (13).
  17. Gibson R. Intercultural Business Communication / R. Gibson. – Oxford : Oxford University Press. 2004. P. 20.
  18. Высоцкая И.В. Альтернативный вопрос в Youtube-интервью: лингвистический, прагматический, когнитивный аспекты// Вестник НГУ. Серия: История, филология. 2022. №6.
  19. Taylor S. E., Pham L. B., Rivkin I. D., & Armor D. A. Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping// American Psychologist, 53(4), 1998. pp. 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.42

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).