Unique items hypothesis: a case study of student Russian-to-English translations

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The subject of this article is the unique linguistic means of expressing the meaning given in the original in the interlanguage and translation perspectives. The object of the research is a contrastive study of original untranslated texts in the target language in order to identify unique linguistic elements, i.e. typical, idiomatic linguistic means of expressing the meaning given in the original in the target language. Special attention is paid to the corpus approach to the functional contrastive analysis of original untranslated texts. The authors consider the possibility of applying semasiological and onomasiological approaches to the contrastive analysis of parallel texts. The purpose of the article is to test the hypothesis of "unique elements" and the degree of their representation in the texts of translations made by graduate students. "Unique elements" means typical, idiomatic, regular linguistic means of expressing a certain meaning in the target language, which do not have structurally equivalent linguistic means in the source language. Research methods: functional contrastive analysis; corpus analysis; retrospective analysis of the source text and the translation text. The main conclusions of the study are the assumption that student translations do not present unique linguistic means in the translation language to express the meaning given in the original. These results were obtained through the use of contrastive functional analysis of parallel texts, i.e. original untranslated texts in the original language and the target language. A special contribution of the authors to the subject under study is that the latest methods of contrastive functional analysis and corpus methods are used for translation purposes. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that in Russian translation studies, for the first time, the hypothesis of unique linguistic elements and their non-representation in the translation text was considered as one of universals.

References

  1. Chersterman A. What is a unique item? // Doubts and directions in translation studies: selected contributions from the EST Congress, Lisbon 2004 / edited by Y. Gambier, M. Shlesinger and R. Stolze. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House, 2007. P. 3-15.
  2. Translation Universals. Do They Exist? / Ed. by A. Mauranen, P. Kujamäki. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House, 2004.
  3. Schäffner C, Adab B. The Idea of the Hybrid Texts and Translation: Contact as Conflict // Across Languages and Cultures. 2001 Sept; 2. Pp. 167-180.
  4. Frawley, W. Reprint of ‘Prolegomenon to a theory of translation’ // Translation Studies Reader. Ed. by L. Venuti. London & New York: Routledge. P. 250-263.
  5. Duff A. Third Language: Recurrent Problems of Translation into English. Oxford: Oxford Unievrsity Press. 1985.
  6. Nilsson P.O. Translation-Specific Lexicogrammar? Characteristic Lexical and Collocational Patterning in Swedish Texts Translated from English // Translation Universals. Do They Exist? / Ed. by A. Mauranen, P. Kujamäki. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House, 2004. P. 129-143.
  7. Tirkkonen-Condit S. Unique Items – Over- or Under-Represented in Translated Language? // Translation Universals. Do They Exist? / Ed. by A. Mauranen, P. Kujamäki. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House, 2004. P. 177-187.
  8. Altenberg B., Granger S. Recent Trends in Cross-Linguistic Lexical Studies // Lexis in Contrast: Corpus-Based Approaches / Ed. by Altenberg B. Granger S. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House, 2002. P. 3-51.
  9. Jia J., Afzaal M. Naqvi S.B. Myth or Reality? Some Directions on Translation Universals in Recent Corpus Based Case Studies // Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 16;13:902400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902400.
  10. Shang X. When Contrastive Analysis Meets Translation Studies: A Historical Perspective // Target, Volume 35, Number 2, 2023. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House. Pp. 186-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/target.20027.sha
  11. Tarawneh R.T., Al-Momani I.M. Contrastive Analysis of Translation Shifts in Lexical Repetition in Aranic-English Legal Translations // World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press. Vol. 13(1), Pp. 1-69.
  12. Tawfeek A.S.M. The Use of Corpora in Translation Into the Second Language: A Project-Based Approach // Front. Educ., Sec. Higher Education. Volume 7, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.849056
  13. Kanglong L, Zhongzhu L., Lei L. Simplification in Translated Chinese: An Entropy-Based Approach // Lingua. Vol. 275, August, 2022, 103364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103364
  14. Gambier Y. The Conceptualisation of Translation in Translation Studies: A Response // Translation Studies Volume 16, Issue 2: The Conceptualisation of Translation in Translation Studies: Past, Present and Future. 2023. P. 317-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2023.2209576
  15. Liang Y., Sang Zh. Syntactic and Typological Properties of Translational Language: A Comparative Description of Dependency Treebank of Academic Abstract // Lingua. Vol. 273, 2022, 1003345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103345
  16. Zhao Q., Jiang J. Syntactic Function of Words Grammatically Related to Verbs in Interlanguage: A Valency Perspective // Lingua. Vol. 300, March 2024, 103675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103675
  17. Huang Y., Dechao L. Translatorial Voice through Modal Stance: A corpus-based Study of Modality Shifts in Chinese-to-English Translation of Research Article Abstract // Lingua. Volume 295, November 2023, 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103610
  18. Xu H., Liu K. Syntactic Simplification in Interpreted English: Dependency Distance and Direction Measures // Lingua. Volume 294, October 2023, 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103607
  19. Bonelli E.T. Functionally Complete Units of Meaning across English and Italian: Towards a Corpus-Driven Approach // Lexis in Contrast: Corpus-Based Approaches / Ed. by Altenberg B. Granger S. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing House, 2002. P. 73-97.
  20. Bell, R. (1992). Translation and translating: theory and practice (applied linguistics and language study). London: Routledge.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).