The dividing question as a hedging tool in the dialogues of the British working class

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The subject of the study is the dividing issues-hedges in the speech of the British working class. The purpose of the work is to determine the features of their functioning as a means of speech fencing (hedging). The main communicative tasks for which representatives of the British working class resort to using the structure of the dividing question in order to hedge their statements are identified: expression of opinion, criticism, statement of fact, assumption, proposal, demand, request for information and intention. A number of patterns have also been identified when using ascending or descending nuclear tones in the second half of the dividing questions used as hedges. The material of the study is the dialogues of the characters, representatives of the modern London working class, of the movie "Sorry We Missed You" (2019, directed by K. Loach) in the original language.  The work uses linguistic and contextual analysis in order to classify the research material. Audit and electroacoustic analysis of statements were also carried out using the Praat program. The novelty of the study lies in the choice of material and subject of the study: the film "Sorry We Missed You" has not been considered by linguists as a material for analyzing the rhythmic dynamics of English speech, and the features of hedging in communication of the British working class remain extremely poorly studied. The study showed that hedging, allowing communicants to maintain each other's personal boundaries, is not always a means of making a statement polite, as it is often used even in conflict situations. The emotional state of the addressee does not reduce the need to apply a speech separation strategy (including using the structure of the dividing question), but it affects its rhythmic and melodic design. Other important factors in choosing the intonation of hedges are the desire to continue or end the conversation, as well as the gender of the speaker.

References

  1. Баранова К. М, Афанасьева О. В. Эвфемизация речи на современн.0ом этапе развития английского языка // Вестник Московского городского педагогического университета. Серия: Филология. Теория языка. Языковое образование. 2021. №1(41). С. 32–41.
  2. Бурнакова К. Н. Проблема изучения ритмомелодики предложения живого языка // International scientific review. 2016. №12 (22). C. 60–62.
  3. Бурнакова К. Н., Боргоякова Т. Н. Ритмомелодическое оформление иноязычной речи: содержательный аспект // Казанская наука. 2018. №9. С. 64–67.
  4. Ионина А. А., Саакян А. А. Английская грамматика XXI века. Учебное пособие по английскому языку. Москва: Менеджер, 2006.
  5. Ионина А. А., Саакян А. А. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (обзорно-критическая рецензия) // Иностранные языки в школе. 2003. №3 С. 104–108.
  6. Михалева Е. И., Пушинина И. В. Прагматические особенности хеджирования в академическом дискурсе. // Вестник Московского городского педагогического университета. Серия: Филология. Теория языка. Языковое образование. 2022. №45 (1). С. 113–124.
  7. Фрейдина Е. Л., Абрамова Г. С. Паузация как маркер разговорности в современном британском устном дискурсе // Вестник Московского городского педагогического университета. Серия: Филология. Теория языка. Языковое образование. 2017. №3(27). С. 60–67.
  8. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  9. Fox K. Watching the English. The Hidden Rules of English Behaviour. L.: Hodder & Stoughton, 2014.
  10. Fraser B. Hedging in Political Discourse: The Bush 2007 Press Conferences // Web. Boston University. 2010. URL: www.bu.edu/sed/files/2010/10/2010-Hedging-in-Political-Disciourse-The-2007Bush-Press-Conferences.pdf
  11. Lakoff G. Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts // Journal of Philosophical Logic. 1973. Vol 2(4). Pp. 458–508.
  12. Martín-Martín P. The Mitigation of Scientific Claims in Research Papers: A Comparative Study // International Journal of English Studies. Vol. 8(2). 2006. Pp. 133–152.
  13. Pichler H. Grammaticalization and language contact in a discourse-pragmatic change in progress: The spread of innit in London English. Language in Society. 2021. № 50. Pp. 1–39.
  14. Wells C. English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).