Information support of the university's activities as a tool for implementing regional policy based on the example of the Republic of Tatarstan

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the analysis of the regional component in the information policy of leading universities in the Republic of Tatarstan and the potential of their own communication channels to achieve the goals of regional policy. The subject of the research is the information policy of the universities of the Republic of Tatarstan, including Kazan Federal University, Kazan National Research Technological University, and Kazan State Power Engineering University. Special attention is paid to the regional aspect in the content of articles on official websites and social media pages. The aim of the work is to identify the role of university communication channels in implementing regional state policy. The basis of the research is content analysis of publications from January to May 2025 on official websites, university pages on the social network VK, and the messaging app Telegram. Particular attention is given to the frequency and context of the use of regional markers ("Tatarstan," "Republic," "President," "Policy," "Grants," "Ministry," derivatives of the word "State," and various programs to support youth initiatives), which on average appear in 10% of the studied posts. The work confirms the close interrelationship between the information policies of universities and the regional agenda, emphasizing their significance as key actors in shaping the educational, scientific, and social environment of Tatarstan. The main methods of research are quantitative and qualitative content analysis of materials from regional universities published on official websites and social media groups. The novelty of the research lies in identifying the role of communication channels of regional universities as a tool for informing about implemented programs and support measures relevant to students and teachers. The official websites, social networks, and messaging apps of universities are integrated into the electronic government system as an additional point of contact with a specific target audience. The published materials perform both informative and stimulating functions, allowing for achieving higher values on key regional performance indicators, such as the Human Development Index (HDI). Based on the analysis conducted, a political component was found in an average of 10% of publications related to Tatarstan universities, and specific features of the information policies of the studied universities were discovered, which stem from both the specifics of the training areas and the internal culture and values of the university.

References

  1. Гуреева А. Н. Глубокая медиатизация как драйвер информационной работы вуза // Медиа в современном мире. 63-и Петербургские чтения : Сборник материалов Международного научного форума. 2024. С. 168-169. EDN: LLGVTQ.
  2. Фаюстов А. В., Бенеманский Д. А., Краснова А. В. Медиастратегия вуза: связь целей, структурных решений и деятельности // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2021. Т. 25, № 4. С. 135. doi: 10.15826/umpa.2021.04.041 EDN: SAYGRG.
  3. Федюнин Д. В. Формирование GR-коммуникаций университета с внешними стейкхолдерами // Плехановский научный бюллетень. 2017. № 2(12). С. 230-235. EDN: ZXOEAN.
  4. Смирнова Е. А., Матвеева А. С. Факторы брендообразования вуза (на материале публикаций о ВолГУ в волгоградских СМИ) // Вестник ВолГУ. Серия 8: Литературоведение. Журналистика. 2009. № 8. С. 141-147. EDN: LHTEZN.
  5. Габдрахманов Н. К., Карачурина Л. Б., Мкртчян Н. В., Лешуков О. В. Образовательная миграция молодёжи и оптимизация сети вузов в разных по размеру городах // Вопросы образования. 2022. № 2. С. 88-116. doi: 10.17323/1814–9545-2022-2-88-116 EDN: ANWKLZ.
  6. Petruzzelli A. M. The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis // Technovation. 2011. No. 31(7). P. 309-319.
  7. Kindt A.-M., Geissler M., Bühling K. Be my (little) partner?! – Universities' role in regional innovation systems when large firms are rare // Journal of Regional Science. 2022. Vol. 62. P. 1274–1295.
  8. Mukhamadullin S., Andreeva Yu., Ratner F., Raskhodova I. University information policy as a tool for supporting civic engagement of student youth // E3S Web of Conferences. 2023. Vol. 449. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202344907017 EDN: RVUCFL.
  9. Смирнов В. А. Молодёжная политика и воспитательная деятельность в российских университетах: этапы развития и ключевые противоречия // Высшее образование в России. 2023. № 5. C. 9-20. doi: 10.31992/0869–3617-2023-32-5-9-20 EDN: ADRDWX.
  10. Островкин Д. Л., Сандлер Д. Г. Влияние молодежной политики на реализацию программы развития университета // Векторы благополучия: экономика и социум. 2024. № 1 (52). C. 89-92.
  11. Островкин Д. Л., Сандлер Д. Г. Молодежная политика и ее роль в стратегическом развитии университета // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 21. Управление (государство и общество). 2024. № 4. C. 70-92. doi: 10.55959/MSU2073-2643-21-2024-4-70-92 EDN: XUJWBW.
  12. Милюкова А. Г. Культура без коммуникаций? Внутрикорпоративные коммуникации в университетах // Российская школа связей с общественностью. 2023. № 28. C. 56-67. EDN: KAAEXX.
  13. Koivumäki K., Karvonen E., Koivumäki T. Challenges in the collaboration between researchers and in-house communication professionals in the digital media landscape // JCOM. 2021. Vol. 20. No. 03. P. 21.
  14. Морозова С. С. Цифровые экосистемы в политической сфере: анализ тенденций и перспективы развития // ПОЛИТЭКС. 2024. № 2. C. 356-368. doi: 10.21638/spbu23.2024.215 EDN: FAVSYB.
  15. Zubov V. Business-Government Relations (GR) as a Problem Field of Modern Political Science: Theoretical Issues // Sociopolitical Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15. P. 22-32. doi: 10.33693/2223–0092-2025-15-2-22-32 EDN: PQEZSM.
  16. Fedyunin D. V., Lochan S. A., Avtonomova S. A., Kutyrkina L. I., Mintusov I. E. The scenario approach to establishing GR communications in higher education institutions // Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 2 (32). P. 472-480. doi: 10.14505/jarle.v92(32).11 EDN: VPTCCI.
  17. Zubov V. Communicative, ideological and expert-analytical aspects of Government Relations (GR) in the structure of modern corporations // Sociopolitical Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15. P. 51-60. doi: 10.33693/2223–0092-2025-15-1-51-60 EDN: IOWXUP.
  18. Rahmeeva I., Barykin A. Russian school of corporate GR: research program // Moscow Economic Journal. 2024. No. 7. P. 74-101. doi: 10.55186/2413046X_2024_9_7_318 EDN: GWOCTM.
  19. Пясецкая Е. Н. Электронное правительство и электронная демократия: институциализация политики информационного развития // Концепт. 2017. № 9. C. 1-8.
  20. Stefan M. Social Media and Technological Ubiquity, in Agile Development of E-Business Solutions at the Government Level // Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. 2025. Vol. 19. P. 2149–2161.
  21. Rudan I. Editor's view: Value of information in the 21st century – examples from science, medicine, policy, media, and markets // Journal of Global Health. 2025. Vol. 15. P. 103-106.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).