Identification of priority mechanisms for tax regulation of individual entrepreneurs by the method of laboratory experiment

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

One of the national goals of Russia, the implementation of which is scheduled for 2030, is to reduce the level of poverty by half - to 6.6% of the population, or by 9.5 million people. A significant source of poverty reduction is the development of individual entrepreneurial initiatives and the promotion of self-employment. This circumstance determined the purpose of this study - to identify the importance of individual fiscal factors in starting one's own business and developing entrepreneurship. As a methodological basis of the article, a laboratory experiment was used, conducted in a student environment and additionally tested on existing entrepreneurs and self-employed. The paper describes the results of a laboratory experiment, which is aimed at determining the priority mechanisms for tax regulation of individual entrepreneurs. The scientific novelty of the research is presented in two directions. 1. Improved methodological approach to the implementation of laboratory experiments in the tax area. In particular, the objectivity of the results obtained from the data of the student sample is substantiated. 2. Priority areas of tax incentives for entrepreneurial initiatives have been identified. The Government of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Finance and the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, other interested bodies of state power and administration can use the results of the study in determining ways to develop the tax policy of the Russian Federation in terms of improving the taxation of individual entrepreneurship.

References

  1. Education and training in Europe. 2020 – the contribution of education and training to economic recovery, growth and jobs, European Commission, 2013. – URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52012XG1219%2802%29 (дата обращения 12.04.2023 г.)
  2. European Framework for Key Competences, European Commission, 2006. – URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF (дата обращения 01.04.2023 г.)
  3. Отчет о НИР «Применение методологии налоговых экспериментов в образовательном процессе для определения оптимального уровня налоговой нагрузки на физических лиц». 2021 год. Финансовый университет. 106 с. Регистрационный номер ЦИТИС 221070600060-0.
  4. Muntean A., Gavrila-Paven I. Why Would Young Students Choose Entrepreneurship? //Annals of the “Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series. 2012. No. 4/2012. Pp. 180-186.
  5. Исследование: сколько стоит начать свой бизнес в России // Тинькофф журнал. 28.05.2021. – URL: https://journal.tinkoff.ru/news/how-open-small-biz/ (дата обращения: 17.04.2023).
  6. «Сбер» назвал средний размер первоначального взноса по ипотеке / Официальный сайт РБК. 24.03.2021. – URL: https://realty.rbc.ru/news/605b1f4f9a79474f1e34ee54 (дата обращения: 17.04.2023).
  7. Spicer, M. W., Becker, L. A. Fiscal inequity and tax evasion: An experimental approach// National Tax Journal.1980. No. 33(2). Pp. 171-175.
  8. Kireenko A. P., Nevzorova E. N., Kireyeva A. F., Filippovich A. S., Khoroshavina E. S. Lab experiment to investigate tax compliance: the case of future taxpayers’ behavior in Russia and Belarus // Journal of Tax Reform – 2018.-Vol. 4, No. 3. Pp. 266–290.
  9. Noor Hazlina Ahmad, Aizzat Mohd Nasurdin, Hasliza Abdul Halim, Seyedeh Khadijeh Taghizadeh The Pursuit of Entrepreneurial Initiatives at the “Silver” Age: From the Lens of Malaysian Silver Entrepreneurs // Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences.-2014. No. 129. Pp. 305-313.
  10. Майбуров И.А. Массовый оппортунизм налогоплательщиков как следствие отсутствия в нашем обществе налоговой морали // Налоги и финансовое право. 2012. № 9. С. 179–192.
  11. Alm J. Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies // International Tax and Public Finance. – 2012. Vol. 19. No. 1. Pp. 54–77.
  12. Torgler B. Speaking to theorists and searching for facts: Tax morale and tax compliance in experiments // Journal of Economic Surveys. 2002. Vol. 16. No. 5. Pp. 657–683.
  13. Torgler B. Tax compliance and tax morale: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Cheltenham, UK. 2007.
  14. Hite P. A. An examination of the impact of subject selection on hypothetical and self-reported taxpayer noncompliance // Journal of Economic Psychology. 1988. No. 9. Pp. 445–466.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).