Features of the American foreign direct investment: the role of the American holdings
- Autores: Konovalova Y.A.1, Liongo Monkisheme V.1, Ushanov S.A.2
-
Afiliações:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- Ernst and Young, LLC
- Edição: Volume 29, Nº 2 (2021): ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMY
- Páginas: 238-252
- Seção: WORLD CAPITAL MARKET
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-2329/article/view/324217
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2021-29-2-238-252
- ID: 324217
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
Article is dedicated to the determination of key features of the United States participation in the international capital movement on the example of FDI’ outflows and inflows, and confirmation of its heterogeneous nature. Tax reform that has been implemented in the end of 2017 led to the result when USA was deleted of the list of TOP-20 world investors of 2018 (by UNCTAD). The scientific opinion and fears were connected with the forecasts that the tax reform could change the movement of FDI flows back to the USA from foreign countries, especially, and the countries with the low taxes and the most favorable investment regimes. At the same time, it needs to underline that the analysis of U.S. FDI inflows and outflows showed that the negative indicator of U.S. FDI outflow (export) in 2018-2019 was connected with the repatriation of U.S. holding companies’ profits, that were doing business in countries with the most favorable tax and investment regimes. The authors tried to investigate the nature of the American holdings role and the integration of U.S. in to the global system of FDI and capital movement.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
Yulia Konovalova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: konovalovayua@rudn.ru
Candidate of Science (in Economics), the head teacher, International Economic Relations Department
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationVerity-Alexia Liongo Monkisheme
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Email: 1032165514@rudn.ru
student (Degree of Bachelor in Economics), International Economic Relations Department
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationStepan Ushanov
Ernst and Young, LLC
Email: UshanovSA@gmail.com
senior expert, Department of Investigation of Financial Fraud and Assistance in Disputable Situations
1 Sadovnicheskaya Naberezhnaya, bldg 377, Moscow, 115035, Russian FederationBibliografia
- Aksenov, P.A. (2018). Trump’s tax reform and American business. International Trade and Trade Policy, (6), 91-103. (In Russ.)
- Arhangelskij, I.Ju. (2019). Antimonopoly regulation of foreign capital in the USA. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 2(590), 57-74. (In Russ.)
- Filippova, V.A. (2019). The importance of tax reform in the US in the aria of tax benefits. Colloquium-Journal, 9-10(33), 86-87. (In Russ.)
- Hines, J.R., & Rice, E.M. (1994). Fiscal paradise: Foreign tax havens and American business. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(1), 149-182.
- Kondratyeva, N.B. (2017). The U.S. - EU Transatlantic Partnership: Prospects. World Economy and International Relations, 61(8), 5-13. (In Russ.)
- Konovalova, Yu.A. (2020). U.S. in the global FDI’ flows: Repatriation of foreign earning by U.S. from EU members as the new global trend. RUDN Journal of Economics, 28(1), 172-183. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2020-28-1-172-183
- Pechatnov, V.O. (2020). America gripped crises. World Economy and International Relations, 64(10), 5-16. (In Russ.)
- Petrovskaja, N.E. (2018). Influence of the foreign direct investment on employment (USA’ experience). Megatrends of the Global Economy and International Business: International Conference Edition (pp. 144-146). (In Russ.)
- Portanskiy, A.P. (2019). US - Europe: Allied relations under threat. Contemporary Europe, 6(92), 30-40. (In Russ.)
- Sogrin, V.V. (2016). U.S. foreign policy at the beginning of 21th century. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 5(557), 53-63 (In Russ.)
- Supyan, V.B. (2019a). The state and economy: D. Trump’s version. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 49(5), 5-21. (In Russ.)
- Supyan, V.B. (2019b). US’ economy: Condition, problems, challenges. APR in Vision of Experts (pp. 148-160). (In Russ.)
- Ushanov, S.A. (2017). The American transnational corporation and the questions of external economic safety. The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 9(3), 1-12. (In Russ.)
- Ushanov, S.A., & Fedjakina, L.N. (2019). United States - European Union: Key features of the mutual flows of foreign direct investment and the problem of the American capital repatriation. The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 11(6), 1-14. (In Russ.)
- Ushanov, S.A., & Konovalova, Yu.A. (2019). EU in the system of trade interests of USA. RUDN Journal of Economics, 27(2), 386-400. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-23292019-27-2-386-400
- Ushanov, S.A., Konovalova, Yu.A., & Zarubin, I.S. (2020). US - EU trade cooperation in the context of changing American foreign economic policy. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 13(5), 31-54. (In Russ.)
- Vasilev, V.S. (2019). D. Trump’s tax reform of 2017: Contradictory effects. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 49(11), 35-54. (In Russ.)
- Volgina, N.A. (2015). State TNCs in the world market of foreign direct investment: Modern trends. Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Economics, (1), 57-71. (In Russ.)
- Zimenkov, R.I. (2017). U.S. government foreign investment regulation. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, 8(572), 45-61. (In Russ.)
Arquivos suplementares
