Lao_zi or Confucious? Hu Shih's position in the discussion about the first chinese philosopher
- Authors: Kiselev VA1
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
- Issue: No 4 (2011)
- Pages: 71-79
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-2302/article/view/345559
- ID: 345559
Cite item
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the position of Chinese philosopher Hu Shih in the philosophical discussion in China about the historical priority of Lao-zi or Confucious. Hu Shih's argumentation of historicity of Lao-zi and of his priority is reproduced. Analyzing Hu Shih's polemics with Ling Qichao and Feng Youlan reveals the ideological background of this scientific debate.
Keywords
About the authors
V A Kiselev
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Email: hphilosophy@mail.ru <mailto:hphilosophy@mail.ru>
Кафедра истории философииФакультет гуманитарных и социальных наук; Российский университет дружбы народов; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Supplementary files
