Kazakhstan’s Digitalization Format: Identity and Future


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

These days, digitization is commonly recognized as a global phenomenon. Digital lifestyles are emerging and continually evolving, further amplifying this phenomenon. Technologies such as artificial intelligence, virtual reality, robotics, and autonomous systems are becoming increasingly pervasive. Consequently, human life is undergoing profound digitization. Progressively, the extent of digitization progress is regarded as a crucial determinant of future public and state policy. Successful implementation of digitization projects has significantly influenced human communication, prompted a rethinking of value frameworks, and altered individuals’ perceptions of life’s meaning. In this context, examining the sociocultural and psychological effects of digitization in general - and network identity in particular - is highly pertinent. This study scrutinizes the nature of digitalization through its impact on individuals’ ideological beliefs and on the formation of their identity codes. Given digitalization’s contradictory character, Kazakhstan’s experience stands out: it juxtaposes the risks of migrating human activity into the digital sphere with the ambitious goals of digital transformation and their ensuing achievements. The peculiarities of Kazakhstan’s digitalization policy, with its emphasis on advanced technologies, underscore the need to thoroughly understand the broader phenomenon of digitization. The relevance of this research perspective derives from three imperatives: assessing the potential negative consequences of digitalization, grounding the process in a robust theoretical humanitarian framework, and pinpointing the primary risks associated with network identity in today’s digital landscape. This research leverages the epistemic resources of psychology, sociology, cultural studies, and philosophy. Such interdisciplinary synergy enables a more thorough understanding of digitalization’s role in shaping a new humanistic worldview. These analytical perspectives enable a comprehensive assessment of both Kazakhstan’s specific context and the wider digitization process.

About the authors

Baizhol I. Karipbayev

Karaganda Buketov University

Email: karipbaev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3787-1307
SPIN-code: 1964-5083

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Theory of Culture, Faculty of Philosophy and Psychology

28 Universitetskaya St., Karaganda, 100026, Kazakhstan

Samat M. Zhakin

Karaganda Buketov University

Email: samatsky7@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-4644-3788

Master of Humanities, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Philosophy and Theory of Culture, Faculty of Philosophy and Psychology

28 Universitetskaya St., Karaganda, 100026, Kazakhstan

Galiya R. Seifullina

Karaganda Buketov University

Author for correspondence.
Email: Galiya-magavina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3220-6233
SPIN-code: 4646-2828

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Theory of Culture, Faculty of Philosophy and Psychology

28 Universitetskaya St., Karaganda, 100026, Kazakhstan

References

  1. Berger P, Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Rutkevich ED, transl. Moscow: Medium publ.; 1995. (In Russian).
  2. Foucault M. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Vizgina VP, Avtonomova NS, transl. Saint Petersburg: A-cad publ.; 1994. (In Russian).
  3. Bostrom N. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Filin S, transl. Rapoport T, editor. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber publ.; 2016. (In Russian).
  4. Haraway D. Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Pisarev A, Khamis D, Khanova P, transl. Perm: Gile Press publ.; 2020. (In Russian).
  5. Kutyrev VA, Slyusarev VV, Khusyainov TM. Humanity and Technos: Philosophy of Coevolution. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya publ.; 2020. (In Russian). EDN: AQWUIZ
  6. Heidegger M. The Question Concerning Technology. In: Time and Being: Articles and Speeches. Bibikhin VV, transl. Moscow: Respublika publ.; 1993. (In Russian).
  7. Kosenchuk L. Conceptions of Virtual or Network Identity: Critical Analyses. Modern problems of science and education. 2014;(5). Available from: https://science-education.ru/ ru/article/view?id=14630 (accessed: 02.12.2024). (In Russian).
  8. Meillassoux Q. Subtraction and Contraction: Deleuze, Immanence, and Matter and Memory. Collapse. 2007:63-107.
  9. Markov A. Critical Theory. Moscow: Ripol-Klassik publ.; 2021. (In Russian). EDN: EIOXSI
  10. Vizgin V. On the way to the Other. From the school of suspicion to the philosophy of trust. Moscow: ID YaSK publ.; 2011. (In Russian).
  11. Deleuze G, Guattari F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Kralechkin D, transl. Yekaterinburg: U-Factoria publ.; 2007. (In Russian).
  12. Plyutto P. Research of the reality of the socio-cultural virtual: An attempt to analyze socio-cultural illusions. Moscow: Progres-Traditsiya publ.; 2014. (In Russian).
  13. Korzybski A. Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. New York: Institute of General Semantics; 1994.
  14. Doring N. Sozialpsychologie des Internet: Die Bedeutung des Internet für Kommunikationsprozesse, Identitaten, soziale Beziehungen und Gruppen. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2003.
  15. Derrida J. Positions. Bibikhin VV, transl. Moscow: Academic project publ.; 2007. (In Russian).
  16. Boltanski L, Chiapello E. The New Spirit of Capitalism. Fokin S, transl. Fokin S, editor. Moscow: NLO publ.; 2011. (In Russian). EDN: QOMGMJ
  17. McLuhan M, Fiore Q. War and Peace in the Global Village. Letberg I, transl. Moscow: AST publ.; 2012. (In Russian).
  18. Baudrillard J. Simulacra and simulation. Kachalov AV, transl. Moscow: Ripol-klassik publ.; 2017. (In Russian).
  19. Debord G. Comments on the Society of the Spectacle. Moscow: Logos publ.; 2023. (In Russian).
  20. Debre R. (2009). Introduction to medialogy. Skuratov BM, transl. Moscow: Praksis publ.; 2009. (In Russian).
  21. Bhutani S, Paliwal Y. Digitalization: A Step Towards Sustainable Development. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development. 2015;8(12):11-24.
  22. Hassan R. The Culture of Digitality. In: The Condition of Digitality: A Post-Modern Marxism for the Practice of Digital Life. University of Westminster Press; 2020. P. 129-158. doi: 10.16997/book44.f
  23. Mamrayeva DG, Toxambayeva AB, Tashenova LV. Industry digitalization in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of Karaganda University. 2022;1(1):54-67. doi: 10.31489/2022ec1/54-67 EDN: NYHUEI
  24. Yermekbaeva D, Rakhmatullina A. The Importance of Implementing Digitalization in Kazakhstan. Eurasian Journal of Economic and Business Studies. 2020;3(3):40-55. doi: 10.47703/ejebs.v3i57.19 EDN: KEXCSK
  25. Ellul J. Technological Society. New York: Random House; 1967.
  26. Foucault M. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of Prison. Sheridan A, transl. New York: Vintage Books; 1999.
  27. Weber M. Economy and Society. Tribe K, transl. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 2019.
  28. Kant I. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Gregor M, transl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511809590
  29. Lavazza A, Farina M. Infosphere, Datafication, and Decision-Making Processes in the AI Era. Topoi. 2023;(42):843-856. doi: 10.1007/s11245-023-09919-0 EDN: JPKSUU
  30. Hegel GWF. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Nisbet HB, transl. Wood AW, editor. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1991. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511808012
  31. Locke J. Two Treatises of Government. Available from: https://www.civisbook.ru/files/ File/Lokk_Traktaty_1.pdf (accessed: 11.12.2024). (In Russian).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).