Experimental Turn in Philosophy

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The research serves as an introduction to experimental philosophy and introduces a special journal issue on this topic. We trace a brief history of experimental philosophy and consider different variants of its interpretation. Building upon this, we propose the interpretation of experimental philosophy not as a particular direction or stage in the development of philosophical thought but rather as a radical change in the method of philosophical inquiries, involving the synthesis of traditional philosophical research methods and methodology of empirical (primarily cognitive) science to solve philosophical problems. An important characteristic feature of experimental philosophy, so defined, is its interdisciplinarity. The philosopher does not just use the results of empirical research but can participate in research at all stages, starting with constructing a model of the phenomenon or process under study and hypothesizing, consistently going through the selection of stimulus material and the design of the experiment towards the interpretation of the results and their philosophical understanding. This interpretation of experimental philosophy opens up the possibility of experimental philosophical research in any field, from epistemology or ontology to logic and philosophy of language, without a far-fetched division into analytical and experimental versions. At the same time, the authors emphasize the remarkable fruitfulness of (neuro)phenomenology, which, due to its appeal to direct subjective experience, turns out to be methodologically close to the natural sciences. The final part provides a brief overview of the studies in the thematic issue.

About the authors

Natalia V. Zaitseva

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: natvalen@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1691-1402
SPIN-code: 3458-9236

PhD in Philosophy, Leading Research Associate, Department of Philosophy of Language and Communication, Faculty of Philosophy

27/4 Lomonosovsky Prospekt, Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian Federation

Dmitry V. Zaitsev

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: zaitsev@philos.msu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9076-4658
SPIN-code: 3506-3020

DSc in Philosophy, Department of Logic, Faculty of Philosophy

27/4 Lomonosovsky Prospekt, Moscow, GSP-1, 119991, Russian Federation

References

  1. Li J, Zhu X. Twenty years of experimental philosophy research. Metaphilosophy. 2023;54(1):29-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12602
  2. Knobe J, Nichols S. ExperimentalPhilosophy. In: Zalta EN, editor. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/experimental-philosophy/ (accessed: 10.05.2024).
  3. Machery E et al. Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition. 2004;92(3):B1-B12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.003
  4. Knobe J. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis. 2003;63(3):190-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8284.00419
  5. Weinberg JM, Nichols S, Stich S. Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical topics. 2001;29(1/2):429-460. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics2001291/217
  6. Knobe J, Nichols S, editors. Experimental philosophy. Oxford University Press; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195323252.002.0004
  7. Hume D. Works in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Thought; 1996.
  8. Libet B. Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and brain sciences. 1985:8(4):529-539. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00044903
  9. Wilkenfeld DA, Samuels R, editors. Advances in experimental philosophy of science. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2019. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350068896
  10. Alexander J. Experimental philosophy: An introduction. Polity; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819113000259
  11. Gilbert F et al. Embodiment and estrangement: results from a first-in-human “intelligent BCI” trial. Science and engineering ethics. 2019;25:83-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0001-5
  12. Klein E et al. Engineering the brain: ethical issues and the introduction of neural devices. Hastings Center Report. 2015;45(6):26-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.515.
  13. Alexander J, Mallon R, Weinberg JM. Accentuate the negative. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2010;1:297-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0015-2
  14. Gallagher S, Zahavi D. The phenomenological mind. Routledge: 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429319792
  15. Westlin C et al. Improving the study of brain-behavior relationships by revisiting basic assumptions. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2023;27(3):246-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.12.015

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).