Education and social networking: Between connectivism and the critical social philosophy of the new media
- Авторлар: De Martino M.1, Kovalenko S.A.1, Tkach G.F.1, Isidori E.2
-
Мекемелер:
- RUDN University
- University of Rome Foro Italico
- Шығарылым: Том 22, № 1 (2022)
- Беттер: 137-149
- Бөлім: Contemporary society: the urgent issues and prospects for development
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-2272/article/view/323120
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-1-137-149
- ID: 323120
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
The so-called ‘Internet Studies’ have highlighted the importance of pedagogy declined as a philosophy of education, as a science able to provide, together with other social and cultural sciences, a significant contribution to the understanding of the implications and educational potential of the Net in the age of infosphere. Over the past few years, the so-called ‘social networking pedagogy’ has emerged as an interdisciplinary approach focusing on curriculum and training. It is a pedagogy that identifies in the interaction that takes place, for example, in social networks (‘containers’ for communicative interaction) the possibility of developing a learning and training model that not only opens up new scenarios for education of the future through new media but also allows to understand critically the whole contemporary culture. Therefore, starting from the analysis of this scenario and using a theoretical methodology based on mainly hermeneutical-deconstructive and historical-dialectical approaches, the article outlines the possible epistemological framework for the ‘networking pedagogy’ within the Internet studies, and identifies its main issues. The authors highlight how this specific pedagogy develops today as a ‘pedagogy of culture’ characterized by a positive and optimistic approach to the new media (with particular reference to social networks). After identifying the advantages and disadvantages of the new media, such a pedagogy intends to consider pedagogical issues that teachers and trainers have to focus on and transform into effective educational communication content and tools for the curriculum. The article examines the contributions of the critical pedagogy scholars David Trend and Henry Giroux who can be considered the pioneers of networking pedagogy. The article concludes by highlighting the importance of ethics as a pedagogical practice that, through control, regulation and supervision of communicative interactions in social networks, paves the way for their conscious and educational use.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
M. De Martino
RUDN University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: de-martino-m@rudn.ru
кандидат политических наук, доцент кафедры маркетинга
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, RussiaS. Kovalenko
RUDN University
Email: kovalenko-sa@rudn.ru
кандидат исторических наук, доцент кафедры сравнительной образовательной политики, директор Центра сравнительного международного образования
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, RussiaG. Tkach
RUDN University
Email: tkach-gf@rudn.ru
кандидат физико-математических наук, доцент кафедры сравнительной образовательной политики
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, RussiaE. Isidori
University of Rome Foro Italico
Email: emanuele.isidori@uniroma4.it
профессор кафедры наук об активности и здоровье человека
Piazza L. De Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, ItalyӘдебиет тізімі
- Bueno L. Innovar el procesoeducativo: La construcción de los sujetos. Mexico; 2013.
- Castañeda L., Gutiérrez I. Redes sociales y otros tejidos online para conectar personas. Aprendizaje con redes sociales. Tejidos educativos para los nuevos entornos; 2010.
- Chatti M.A., Jarke M., Quix C. Connectivism: The network metaphor of learning. International Journal of Learning Technology. 2010; 5 (1).
- Cole R.A. (Ed.). Issues in Web-Based Pedagogy: A Critical Primer. Greenwood Publishing Group; 2000.
- Collins A., Halverson R. Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America. Teachers College Press; 2018.
- Davidovitch N., Belichenko M. Using Facebook in higher education: Exploring effects on social climate: Achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Higher Education. 2018; 7 (1).
- Davies J. Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers & Education. 2012; 59 (1).
- Debord G. Society of the Spectacle. Bread and Circuses Publishing; 2012.
- Dutton W.H. Internet studies: The foundations of a transformative field. The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxfor; 2013.
- Farmer H., Ramsdale J. Teaching competencies for the online environment. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 2016; 42 (3).
- Floridi L. Pensare l’infosfera: La filosofia come design concettuale. Raffaello Cortina Editore; 2020.
- Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Routledge; 2013.
- Aronowitz S., Giroux H. Postmodern Education: Politics, Culture, and Social Criticism. University of Minnesota Press; 1991.
- Goffman E., Perren H.B.T, Setaro F. La presentación de la persona en la vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires; 1981.
- Jarvis J. What Would Google Do? Reverse Engineering the Fastest Growing Company in the History of the World. New York; 2011.
- Kuhn C. Are Students Ready to (Re)-Design Their Personal Learning Environment? The Case of the E-Dynamic. Space; 2017.
- Longo G.O. La lunga strada di Homo technologicus. Scienza & Società. 2018; 11.
- Luckin R. Re-Designing Learning Contexts: Technology-Rich, Learner-Centred Ecologies. Routledge; 2010.
- Manca S., Ranieri M. Implications of social network sites for teaching and learning. Where we are and where we want to go. Education and Information Technologies. 2017; 22 (2).
- Marson S.M. Internet ethics for social workers. New Social Worker. 2000; 7.
- Martin M., Noakes M. Fostering a web 2.0 ethos in a traditional e-learning environment. Electronic Journal of E-Learning. 2012; 10 (3).
- Menduni E., Nencioni G., Pannozzo M. Social Networks: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Others: Social Relations, Aesthetics, Emotions. Milan; 2011.
- Murphy D. The Architecture of Failure. John Hunt Publishing; 2012.
- Negroponte N. Being Digital. Milano; 1999.
- Postman N. Media ecology education. Explorations in Media Ecology. 2006; 5 (1).
- Reales de Castro E., Bohorquez M.S., Rueda Barrera A.A. Lineamientos conceptuales de las redes sociales: una aproximación de su aplicabilidad a la regulación de la violencia. Lineamientos conceptuales de las redes sociales: una aproximación de su aplicabilidad a la regulación de la violencia; 1995.
- Requena Santos F. El concepto de red social. Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas. 1989; 48.
- Seery A. Education, the formation of self and the world of Web 2.0. London Review of Education. 2010; 8 (1).
- Siemens G. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 2005; 2.
- Trend D. Cultural Pedagogy: Art, Education, Politics. Greenwood Publishing Group; 1992.
- Ushakov K.M., Kukso K.N. Advantages of social network analysis in educational research. Russian Education & Society. 2015; 57 (10).
- Voivonta T., Avraamidou L. Facebook: A potentially valuable educational tool? Educational Media International. 2018; 55 (1).
Қосымша файлдар
