“Who are surrogate mothers?”: Rethinking motherhood in Russia in the context of assisted reproductive technologies
- Authors: Polyakova I.G.1, Shvetsova A.V.1, Symanyuk E.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
- Issue: Vol 25, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 79-93
- Section: Contemporary society: the urgent issues and prospects for development
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-2272/article/view/323151
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2025-25-1-79-93
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FVPKBP
- ID: 323151
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The development of assisted reproductive technologies, especially surrogacy, requires a reevaluation of motherhood and an understanding of how gestational motherhood fits into kinship structures since motherhood has transcended the boundaries of the “mother-child” dyad and expanded into the system of “surrogate mother-child-biological mother”, which has shaken the traditional foundations and meanings of this seemingly stable and unshakeable construct. This new reality questions the essence of motherhood and creates new roles within it, primarily determining the question: who are “surrogate mothers”? This question consists of two levels: the social portrait of the surrogate mother and her status. The social portrait will help to understand who becomes a surrogate mother and why; the authors attempt to define a range of demographic criteria (age, place of residence, marital status, level of education, etc.) and personal traits that enable a woman to fulfill this complex role. Concerning social status, the authors attempt to understand the role of surrogate mothers in public consciousness and how the actors involved (surrogates, biological parents, reproductive specialists) perceive her place within the structure of kinship. The study consisted of expert interviews with reproductive specialists, psychologists, and recruitment agents (N=6) and a representative survey (N=1300). The data presents a typical surrogate mother as a 25-33-year-old woman with 1-2 healthy children, often a single mother or remarried, with a vocational education and a low income, frequently residing outside of major cities. Experts describe her psychological profile as “a more relaxed outlook on life”, characterized by simplicity, responsibility and having a clear understanding of her life situation. In public perception, the surrogate mother is not integrated into kinship structures; she temporarily fulfills a role, after which her contractual obligations are complete. In Russia, surrogates are viewed as assistants in addressing infertility, hired to carry and deliver the couple’s genetic child. Both parties often anonymize this arrangement to present a conventional family image and alleviate social pressures on the surrogate.
About the authors
I. G. Polyakova
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Author for correspondence.
Email: irinapolykova@yandex.ru
кандидат социологических наук, научный сотрудник Mira St., 19, Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russia
A. V. Shvetsova
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Email: shvetsovaav@mail.ru
кандидат социологических наук, старший научный сотрудник Mira St., 19, Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russia
E. E. Symanyuk
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Email: e.e.symaniuk@urfu.ru
доктор психологических наук, директор Уральского гуманитарного института; заведующая кафедрой общей и социальной психологии Уральского федерального университета имени первого президента России Б.Н. Ельцина Mira St., 19, Ekaterinburg, 620002, Russia
References
- Aha K., Ross C.B., Hiebel C. Populism and surrogacy in Spain. Women’s Studies. 2022; 52 (1).
- Alkorta I. Surrogacy in Spain: Vindication of the mater semper certa est rule. New Bioethics. 2020; 26 (4).
- Banerjee S., Kotiswaran P. Divine labors, devalued work: The continuing saga of India’s surrogacy regulation. Indian Law Review. 2020; 5 (1).
- Berend Z. “We are all carrying someone else’s child!”: Relatedness and relationships in third-party reproduction. American Anthropologist. 2016; 118.
- Dickenson D., van Beers B. Surrogacy: New challenges to law and ethics. New Bioethics. 2020; 26 (4).
- Federal Law No. 143-FZ of November 15, 1997 (as amended on 25.12.2023) “On Acts of Civil Status”. URL: https://fzakon.ru/laws/federalnyy-zakon-ot-15.11.1997-n-143-fz. (In Russ.).
- Federal Law No. 538-FZ of December 19, 2022 “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”. URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202212190052. (In Russ.).
- Karandikar S., Gezinski L., Huber S. Exploring the physical and emotional stress of pregnancy among transnational Indian surrogates. International Social Work. 2017; 60 (6).
- Martínez-López J., Gómez P. Surrogacy in the United States: Analysis of sociodemographic profiles and motivations of surrogates. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2024; Art. 104302.
- Montrone M., Sherman K., Avery J., Rodino I. A Comparison of sociodemographic and psychological characteristics among intended parents, surrogates, and partners involved in Australian altruistic surrogacy arrangements. Fertility and Sterility. 2020; 113 (3).
- The Opinion of the Constitutional Court Judge A.N. Kokotov. URL: https://legalacts.ru/sud/opredelenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-27092018-n-2318-o /?ysclid=lz6me83qla228035957. (In Russ.).
- Pande A. Revisiting surrogacy in India: Domino effects of the ban. Journal of Gender Studies. 2020; 30 (4).
- The position of the Russian Association of Human Reproduction on Surrogacy as of February 11, 2022. URL: https://www.rahr.ru/d_index/PZRAHRCM202202.pdf. (In Russ.).
- Riddle M.P. Psychological assessment of gestational carrier candidates: Current approaches, challenges, and future considerations. Fertility and Sterility. 2020; 113 (5).
- Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of September 27, 2018 No. 2318-O. URL: https://legalacts.ru/sud/opredelenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-27092018-n-2318-o. (In Russ.).
- Teman E. Birthing a Mother: The Surrogate Body and the Pregnant Self. University of California Press; 2010.
- Teman E., Berend Z. Surrogacy as a family project: How surrogates articulate familial identity and belonging. Journal of Family Issues. 2021; 42 (6).
- Tyagi P., Singh A., Tomar S., Kumar N., Singh N., Singh R., Chaudhari A., Verma N. Surrogacy - does it affect physiology of bonding between surrogate mother-fetus and biological mother-newborn? International Journal of Health Sciences & Research. 2015; 5 (3).
- Van Beers B., Bosch L. A revolution by stealth: A legal-ethical analysis of the rise of pre-conception authorization of surrogacy agreements. New Bioethics. 2020; 26 (4).
- Weis C. Changing fertility landscapes: Exploring the reproductive routes and choices of fertility patients from China for assisted reproduction in Russia. Asian Bioethics Review. 2021; 13.
- Weis C. Surrogacy in Russia: An Ethnography of Reproductive Labor, Stratification and Migration. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2021.
- Ziff E. “Honey, I want to be a surrogate”: How military spouses negotiate and navigate surrogacy with their service member husbands. Journal of Family Issues. 2019; 40 (18).
Supplementary files
