Contradictions in the development of eco-consumerism in the context of R. Inglehart’s evolutionary theory of modernization


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article considers the development of eco-sustainable practices as a part of the global cultural shift from materialist values to the post-materialist ones. The first part briefly outlines the central ideas of R. Inglehart’s evolutionary theory of modernization, which defines the global cultural shift as a transition in individual life strategies from “survival” to “self-expression” due to the growing predominance of post-materialist values over the materialist ones. Such transformations are expected to reshape consumer practices - from hedonistic consumption rooted in acquisitive values to responsible, proenvironmental consumption shaped by post-materialist orientations. However, this transition is inconsistent and contradictory due to multiple barriers. The author considers institutional and value-based barriers to the expansion of pro-environmental consumption (green gap, elitism of eco-consumption in qualitative terms, hedonistic values and orientations). The article is based on empirical data and aims at proving the hypothesis of the macro-social stability of hedonistic consumer practices which prevail even in societies with high levels of economic and existential security, where post-materialism dominates the social-political sphere. Even younger generations, which socialized in the conditions of relative economic security and are more likely to have post-materialist orientations, show a decline in interest in pro-environmental consumption. The author argues that eco-consumerism is a nonlinear outcome of the global value shift from materialism to post-materialism, which makes ecoconsumption practices a hybrid phenomenon that reflects an adaptation of consumer values to ecological trends. Thus, eco-consumerism as an expression of post-materialism contradicts the logic of consumerist hedonism supported and reinforced by the contemporary consumer culture.

About the authors

N. V. Goncharov

Orenburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: nik567485@mail.ru
кандидат философских наук, старший преподаватель кафедры философии, культурологии и социологии Prosp. Pobedy, 13, Orenburg, 460018, Russia

References

  1. Almakaeva A.M., Mavletova A.M. Modernizatsionnye protsessy v Rossii: ozhidat li sdviga v storonu emansipativnyh tsennostey? [Modernization in Russia: Should we expect a shift to emancipative values?]. Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny. 2018; 6. (In Russ.).
  2. Davydov D.A. Kontseptsiya postmaterializma Ronalda Ingleharta v kriticheskoy perspective [Ronald Inglehart’s concept of postmaterialism in critical perspective]. Antinomii. 2018; 3. (In Russ.).
  3. Il`yin A.N. Potreblenie i ego globalnye posledstviya [Consumption and its global implications]. Filosofiya i Obshchestvo. 2013; 2. (In Russ.).
  4. Inglehart R. Kulturnaya evoliutsiya. Kak izmenyayutsia chelovecheskie motivatsii i kak eto menyaet mir [Cultural Evolution: People’s Motivations are Changing, and Reshaping the World]. Per. s angl. S.L. Lopatinoy. Moscow, Chelyabinsk; 2020. (In Russ.).
  5. Malinowsky B. Izbrannoe: Dinamika kultury [Selected works: The Dynamics of Culture Change]. Moscow; 2015. (In Russ.).
  6. Martyanov V.S. Globalny Modern, postmaterialnye tsennosti i periferiyny kapitalizm v Rossii [Global Modern, post-material values and peripheral capitalism in Russia]. Political Studies. 2014; 1. (In Russ.).
  7. NAFI i Ekologichesky soyuz: issledovanie ob otnoshenii rossiyan k ekotovaram i ekomarkirovke [NAFI and the Ecological Union: A study of Russians’ attitude toward eco-products and eco-labels]. 2023. URL: https://nafi.ru/analytics/nafi-i-ekologicheskiy-soyuz-issledovanie-ob-otnoshenii-rossiyan-k-ekotovaram-i-ekomarkirovke. (In Russ.).
  8. Radaev V.V. Sotsiologiya potrebleniya: osnovnye podkhody [Sociology of consumption: Basic approaches]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2005; 1. (In Russ.).
  9. Smil V. Sozdanie sovremennogo mira: materialy i dematerializatsiia [Making the Modern World: Materials and Dematerialization]. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
  10. Sorokin PA. Sotsialnaya i kulturnaya dinamika [Social and Cultural Dynamics]. Per. s angl. V.V Sapova. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
  11. Trotsuk I.V., Davydenkova E.S. Fenomen eticheskogo konsyumerizma: spetsifika sotsiologicheskoy interpretatsii i osobennosti sovremennogo bytovaniya [“Ethical consumerism”: The specifics of sociological interpretation and present manifestations]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2015; 1. (In Russ.).
  12. Shabanova M.A., Gitsalova T.A. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie faktory razvitiya etiche-skogo potrebleniya v sovremennom mire: est li budushchee v Rossii? [Social-economic factors of the development of ethical consumption in the contemporary world: Is there a future in Russia?]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2015; 3. (In Russ.).
  13. Shabanova M.A. Novye potrebitelskie praktiki v usloviyah tsifrovizatsii grazhdanskogo obshchestva: rezultaty empiricheskogo issledovaniya v Rossii (statiya 2) [New consumer practices under digitalization of civil society: An empirical study in Russia (Part 2). Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2020; 12. (In Russ.).
  14. Shabanova M.A. Razdelny sbor bytovyh otkhodov kak dobrovolnaya praktika rossiyan: dinamika, faktory, potentsial [Separate waste collection as Russians’ voluntary practice: Dynamics, factors and potential]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2021; 8. (In Russ.).
  15. Ekologichnoe potreblenie [Eco-friendly consumption]. 2021. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/ehkologichnoe-potreblenie. (In Russ.).
  16. Block S., Emerson J.W., Esty D.C. et al. Environmental Performance Index. New Haven; 2024.
  17. Consumption volume per capita in the EU. URL: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/product-lifespans-monitoring-trends/consumption-volume-per-capita-in-the-eu-between-2000-and-2022.
  18. Environment. URL: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1615/environment.aspx.
  19. European Commission: Special Eurobarometer. Attitudes of Europeans towards the Environment. Brussels; 2024.
  20. European Commission: Special Eurobarometer. Attitudes of European Citizens towards the Environment. Brussels; 2008.
  21. Fournier V. Escaping from the economy: The politics of degrowth. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 2008; 28 (11/12).
  22. Griskevicius V., Tybur J., van den Bergh. Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010; 98.
  23. Haanpaa L. Consumers’ green commitment: indication of a postmodern lifestyle? International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2007; 31.
  24. Hansen O., Tol R. A Refined Inglehart Index of Materialism and Post-Materialism. Working Papers FNU-35. Hamburg; 2003.
  25. Households and NPISHs Final Consumption Expenditure per Capita (constant 2015 US$). URL: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators/Series/NE.CON.PRVT.PC.KD.
  26. Inglehart R. Modernization and Post-Modernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press; 1997.
  27. Inglehart R. Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American Political Science Review. 1981; 75 (4).
  28. Inglehart R. The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. American Political Science Review. 1971; 65 (4).
  29. Inglehart R. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton University Press; 1977.
  30. Inglehart R., Abramson P.R. Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review. 1994; 88 (2).
  31. Jackson T. Live better by consuming less? Is there a “double dividend” in sustainable consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2005; 9.
  32. McKibben B. Deep Economy: Economics as if the World Mattered. New York; 2007.
  33. Micheletti M. Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. Palgrave Macmillan; 2003.
  34. Slade G. Made to Break: Technology and Obsolescence in America. Harvard University Press; 2006.
  35. State of the Consumer 2024: What’s now and what’s next. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/state-of-consumer-2024.
  36. Steel B.S., Warner R.L., Lovrich N.P., Pierce J.C. The Inglehart-Flanagan debate over postmaterialist values: Some evidence from a Canadian American case study. Political Psychology. 1992; 13.
  37. Stolle D., Micheletti M. Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. Cambridge University Press; 2013.
  38. Tanner C., Kaiser F.G., Wofing Kast S. Contextual conditions of ecological consumerism. Environment and Behavior. 2004; 36.
  39. The Great Green Maze: How Environmental Advertising Confuses Consumer. URL: https://www.beuc.eu/sites/default/files/publications/BEUC-X-2023-149_The_Great_Green_Maze_How_environmental_advertising_confuses_consumers.pdf
  40. The Road to 2025. Five Key Insights to Help Navigate the Shifting Consumer Landscape. 2024. URL: GlobeScan_Healthy_and_Sustainable_Living_Highlights_Report_2024-V2.pdf
  41. Tranter B., Western M. Overstating value change: Question ordering in the Post-Material Values Index. European Sociological Review. 2010; 26 (5).
  42. Twenge J.M. iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids are Growing up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood — and What That Means for the Rest of Us. New York; 2017.
  43. Udupa N.S., Twenge J.M., McAllister C., Joiner T.E. Increases in poor mental health, mental distress, and depression symptoms among U.S. adults, 1993–2020. Journal of Mood and Anxiety Disorders. 2023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjmad.2023.100013.
  44. Welzel C., Inglehart R.F. Misconceptions of measurement equivalence: Time for a paradigm shift. Comparative Political Studies. 2016; 49 (8).
  45. Gen Z and Millennial Survey: Growth and pursuit of money, meaning, and well-being. URL: https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/issues/work/genz-millennial-survey.html.
  46. % rossiyan vozlagayut otvetstvennost za sostoyanie ekologii na gosudarstvo i biznes [71 % of Russians place responsibility for the state of the environment on the government and business]. 2023. URL: https://nafi.ru/analytics/71-rossiyan-vozlagayut-otvetstvennost-za-sostoyanie-ekologii-na-gosudarstvo-i-biznes. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).