Personal-professional efficiency of employees in the mature digital organization
- Authors: Vasilenko L.A.1, Stepnova L.A.1, Litash-Sorokina E.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
- Issue: Vol 25, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 681-700
- Section: Sociology of management
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-2272/article/view/348851
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2025-25-3-681-700
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ATTUFE
- ID: 348851
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article considers the conditions of personal-professional efficiency of employees in the context of organizational AI maturity as the readiness and ability to use artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The study is based on the hypothesis that the continuous self-improvement of mature digital organizations affects work processes in the given external environment and directly stimulates personal self-improvement of employees in their professional activities. As an AI-mature organization the authors selected a company that has gone through the largest digital transformation and currently implements digital projects both for business and for solving strategic government tasks; one of its priorities is the integration of AI of “new generation” into the human-centric model of business processes (1). The authors show a high level of correlation between AI maturity and the human-centric focus of personal-professional efficiency, which suggests the need for controlled formation of a creative personality with a high level of subjectivity, motivation, responsibility, adaptability and learning ability, capable of building effective interaction and using digital environment, including AI technologies. The relevant criteria for personal self-development are as follows: adaptability, openness, tolerance for uncertainty, self-regulation, courage and metacognitive abilities. The study proved a potential negative impact of digitalization on mental health due to the level of development of digital environment and workspaces of digital companies. Thus, organizational sustainability in an intensively changing environment requires monitoring of the reserves of personal and professional efficiency and the working base that has the potential for continuous improvement and adaptation as a condition for maintaining and releasing cognitive reserves. The authors assess the prospects for an organizational culture of a selective autopoiesis type provided its AI maturity. The feature of such a culture is a human-centric selection of innovative samples of professional and social-cultural activities of employees under their personal and professional development. Based on the monitoring results, the samples as constructs of the change fund can be refined to be self-disseminated in the form of positive and negative feedback.
About the authors
L. A. Vasilenko
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Author for correspondence.
Email: vasilenkola@mail.ru
октор социологических наук, профессор кафедры организационного проектирования систем управления Института государственной службы и управления Vernadskogo Prosp., 82, Moscow, 119571, Russia
L. A. Stepnova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Email: stepnovala@gmail.com
доктор психологических наук, профессор кафедры организационного проектирования систем управления Института государственной службы и управления Vernadskogo Prosp., 82, Moscow, 119571, Russia
E. A. Litash-Sorokina
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Email: elena@lita.sh
аспирантка кафедры организационного проектирования систем управления Института государственной службы и управления Vernadskogo Prosp., 82, Moscow, 119571, Russia
References
- Bitulina K.Yu. Korporativnaya kultura kak faktor vliyaniya na protsess stanovleniya organizatsii (sotsiologichesky analiz) [Corporate Culture as a Factor Influencing the Organization Formation (Sociological Analysis)]. Moscow; 2005. (In Russ.).
- Vasilenko L.A. Menedzhment sotsialnyh innovatsiy [Management of Social Innovations]. Moscow; 2010. (In Russ.).
- Vygotsky L.S. Myshlenie i rech [Thinking and Speech]. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.).
- Zakharova S.A. Tsifrovaya zrelost regionalnyh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti kak osnova “umnogo” publichnogo upravleniya [Digital maturity of regional public authorities as a foundation of “smart” public administration]. Gosudarstvennaya Sluzhba. 2022; 24 (5). (In Russ.).
- Leontiev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoy realnosti [Psychology of Meaning: Nature, Structure and Dynamics of Meaningful Reality]. Moscow; 2003. (In Russ.).
- Litash-Sorokina E.A. Faktory, opredelyayushchie kachestvo zhizni v tsifrovuyu epokhu [Factors determining the quality of life in the digital age]. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie i razvitie Rossii: globalnye trendy i natsionalnye perspektivy. Vol. 3. Moscow; 2023. (In Russ.).
- Litash-Sorokina E.A. Istochniki energii lidera i tsifrovyh komand [Energy sources of leaders and digital teams]. Liderstvo i vyzovy sovremennosti. Moscow; 2023. (In Russ.).
- Markova A.K. Psikhologiya truda uchitelya [Psychology of Teacher’s Work]. Moscow; 1993. (In Russ.).
- Maturana H., Varela F. Drevo poznaniya: Biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya [The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding]. Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.).
- Strategiya tsifrovoy transformatsii: analitichesky doklad Tsentra podgotovki rukovoditeley i komand tsifrovoy transformatsii [Digital Transformation Strategy: Analytical Report of the Center for Training Managers and Teams of Digital Transformation]. Moscow; 2021. (In Russ.).
- Shcherbina V.V. Ratsionaliziruyushchie diagnosticheskie upravlencheskie sotsialnye tekhnologii [Rationalizing, Diagnostic, Management Social Technologies]. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.).
- Shcherbina V.V., Popova E.P. Organizatsionnoe razvitie. Teoriya i praktika [Organizational Development. Theory and Practice]. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.).
- Autor D.H., Katz L.F., Krueger A.B. Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1998; 113 (4).
- Medows Et. Person-centered approach in organizational relationships. Organizational Psychology. 2014; 4 (2).
- Montag С., Lachmann В, Herrlich М., Zweig К. Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16 (14).
- Russo D. The Agile success model: A mixed-methods study of a large-scale Agile transformation. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. 2021; 30 (4).
- Stinchcombe A. Social structure organization. Handbook of Organization. Ed. by J. March. Chicago; 1965.
- Trenerry B., Chang S., Wang Y., Suhaila Z.S., Lim S.S., Lu H.Y., Oh Ph. Preparing workplaces for digital transformation: An integrative review and framework of multi-level factors. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12.
- Vasilenko L., Meshcheryakova N. Digital hybridity: Innovative reality or utopia? Philosophy of Science and Technology. 2023; 28 (1).
- Weiwei Xing, Weibin Liu, Jun Wang, Shunli Zhang, Lihui Wang, Yuxiang Yang, Bowen Song. Visual Object Tracking from Correlation Filter to Deep Learning. Springer; 2021.
Supplementary files

