Two and a half undeservedly forgotten conceptual foundations of rural sociology

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Although Russian society is strongly connected with the countryside and has deep ‘rural roots’, agrarian issues have always been somewhat marginal in the national scientific tradition, mainly in its social-scientific branch. Today the situation seems to change due to at least two globally urgent issues - sustainable food-security patterns (agricultural production) and rural social/human capital - which increase both theoretical and practical interest to the heuristic and reform potential of the rural sociology research. To the acknowledged factors of the somewhat marginal status of rural sociology the authors add the fact that not all its conceptual foundations, especially in the national tradition, were identified and systematized. The article presents only two and a half such foundations: agricultural economics, theories of peasant agrarianism, and, partly, theory of rural-urban continuum (forgotten in its rural half and widely used to explain suburbanization trends). In the first part of the article, the authors reconstruct the historical path of agricultural economics, focusing on its creative adaptation to the specific conditions of rural Russia. At the turn of the 1920s - 1930s, the national and global political-ideological crisis of agricultural economics determined the replacement of its initial German economic-philosophical agrarian approach by the American pragmatic agricultural approach and applied farm management. In the second part of the article, the authors summarize, on the one hand, utopian, political-economic and populist ideas of agrarianism (1); on the other hand, reasons for its fair criticism which did not focus on the utopian ideas of agrarianism (rather on its being an eclectic pragmatic ideology, contradictions between its left and right wings, its negative conservative potential, lack of political experience and decisiveness, and so on). In the third part of the article, the authors reconstruct a more successful life path of the theory of ruralurban continuum, which emphasizes not so much the fundamental differences between rural and urban communities as a spatially extended rural-urban scale of community types differing by size, population density, division of labor, isolation, local solidarity, and so on. This continuum model remains extremely important for the analysis of the social development of contemporary rural areas and should be supplemented by the elements of the theory of peasant economy and cooperation in order to study comprehensively rural social and human capital.

About the authors

A. M. Nikulin

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: harmina@yandex.ru
кандидат экономических наук, директор Центра аграрных исследований Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации; проректор по научной работе Московской высшей школы социальных и экономических наук Vernadskogo Prosp.,84, Moscow,119571, Russia; Gazetny Per.,3-5,1, Moscow,125009, Russia

I. V. Trotsuk

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; RUDN University; National Research University Higher School of Economics

Email: irina.trotsuk@yandex.ru
доктор социологических наук, профессор кафедры социологии Российского университета дружбы народов; ведущий научный сотрудник Центра аграрных исследований Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации и Центра фундаментальной социологии Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики» Vernadskogo Prosp.,84, Moscow,119571, Russia; Miklukho-Maklaya St.,6, Moscow,117198, Russia; Myasnitskaya St., 20, Moscow, 101000, Russia

References

  1. Aereboe F. Fundamentals of Agricultural Economics. Saint Petersburg; 1912. (In Russ.).
  2. Barnett V. Historical political economy in Russia, 1870-1913. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2004; 11 (2).
  3. Bernstein H. V.I. Lenin and A.V. Chayanov: Looking back, looking forward. Journal of Peasant Studies. 2009; 36 (1).
  4. Bilimovich A.D. Cooperation in Russia Before, During and After the Bolsheviks. Moscow; 2005. (In Russ.).
  5. Borras S.M., Edelman M., Kay C. Transnational agrarian movements: Origins and politics, campaigns and impact. Journal of Agrarian Change. 2008; 8 (2-3).
  6. Brass T. Peasants, Populism and Postmodernism. The Return of the Agrarian Myth. London; 2000.
  7. Brinkman T. Economics of the Farm Business. Moscow; 1926. (In Russ.).
  8. Chayanov A.V. Basic ideas and forms of agricultural cooperation. Selected Works. Moscow; 1992. (In Russ.).
  9. Chayanov A.V. Essays on the Theory of Labor Economy. Moscow; 1924. (In Russ.).
  10. Chayanov A.V. Foreword. Goretsky G.I., Malyshev S.M., Rybnikov A.A. Moscow’s Economic Influence on the Regional Organization of Agriculture. Moscow-Leningrad; 1927. (In Russ.).
  11. Chayanov A.V. On the theory of non-capitalist systems of economy. Peasant Economy. Selected Works. Moscow; 1989. (In Russ.).
  12. Chayanov A.V. Organization of the peasant economy. Peasant Economy: Selected Works. Moscow; 1989. (In Russ.).
  13. Chayanov A.V. Organization of the Peasant Economy. Ekaterinburg; 2015. (In Russ.).
  14. Chayanov A.V. Possible future of agriculture. Economic Legacy of A.V. Chayanov. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
  15. Chayanov A.V. Should the zemstvo agronomist work in cooperatives? Cooperative Life. 1915; 1. (In Russ.).
  16. Chayanov A.V. The journey of my brother Alexei to the land of peasant utopia. Venetian Mirror. Moscow; 1990. (In Russ.).
  17. Chayanov A.V. What is the Agrarian Question? Moscow; 1917. (In Russ.).
  18. Chelintsev A.N. Theoretical Basis of Peasant Economy. Kharkov, 1918. (In Russ.).
  19. Cloke P., Marsden T., Mooney P. Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage; 2006.
  20. Darrow D.W. From commune to household: Statistics and the social construction of Chaianov’s theory of peasant economy. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 2001; 43 (4).
  21. Davydenko V.A., Andrianova E.V., Khudyakova M.V. Contemporary global contexts of rural sociology in the realities of the Russian rural life. Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. Social-Economic and Legal Studies. 2020; 6 (3). (In Russ.).
  22. Decree of the Council of People’s Commissars on the unification of all types of cooperative organizations. Cooperative Life. 1920; 1-2. (In Russ.).
  23. Departments of the Council of All-Russian Cooperative Congresses. Proceedings of the Council of All-Russian Cooperative Congresses. 1917; 1. (In Russ.).
  24. Dewey R. The rural-urban continuum: Real but relatively unimportant. American Journal of Sociology. 1960; 66 (1).
  25. Eellend J. Cultivating the Rural Citizen. Modernity, Agrarianism and Citizenship in Late Tsarist Estonia. Stockholm; 2007.
  26. Ely C. Russian Populism: A History. Bloomsbury; 2022.
  27. Ennew J., Hirst P., Tribe K. ’Peasantry’ as an economic category. Journal of Peasant Studies. 1976-1977; 4.
  28. Essays on the Peasant Question. Vol. 1. Moscow; 1904. (In Russ.).
  29. Essays on the Peasant Question. Vol. 2. Moscow; 1905. (In Russ.).
  30. Bulgakov S.N. Capitalism and Farming. Saint Petersburg; 1900. Vol. 1-2. (In Russ.).
  31. Fallows T. Politics and war effort in Russia. The Union of zemstvos and the organization of the food supply, 1914-1916. Slavic Review. 1978; 37 (1).
  32. Ferling J. A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic. Oxford University Press; 2003.
  33. Fischer H.W., Chatre A., Devalkar S., Sohoni M. Rural institutions, social networks, and selforganized. Environmental Research Letters. 2021; 16 (10).
  34. Flagship of the Agrarian-Economic Education. Moscow; 2002. (In Russ.).
  35. Fortunatov A.F. Agriculture and Agronomy. Moscow; 1903. (In Russ.).
  36. Gerasimov I. Modernism and Public Reform in Late Imperial Russia. Rural Professionals and Self-Organization 1905-1930. London; 2009.
  37. Gleason W.E. The All-Russian Union of Towns and the politics of urban reform in tsarist Russia. Russian Review. 1976; 35 (3). (In Russ.).
  38. Gornova G.V. Antinomies of the City. Omsk; 2011. (In Russ.).
  39. Gronsky P.P., Astrov N.J. The War and the Russian Government. New Haven; 1929.
  40. Heinzen J.W. Alien personnel in the Soviet state. The People’s Commissariat of Agriculture under proletarian dictatorship, 1918-1929. Slavic Review. 1997; 56 (1).
  41. Heinzen J.W. Inventing a Soviet Countryside. State Power and the Transformation of Rural Russia, 1917-1929. Pittsburgh; 2004.
  42. Holquist P. “In accord with state interests and the people’s wishes”. The technocratic ideology of Imperial Russia’s resettlement administration. Slavic Review. 2010; 69 (1).
  43. Howard E. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London; 1902.
  44. Inge M.T. Agrarianism in American Literature. New York; 1969.
  45. Ionescu G. Eastern Europe. Populism. Its Meanings and National Characteristics. London; 1969.
  46. Issues of the Systematic Study of the Village. Novosibirsk; 1975. (In Russ.).
  47. Jaffe J., Gertler M. Rural sociology. The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology. Cambridge; 2017.
  48. Johnson R.E. Liberal professionals and professional liberals. The zemstvo statisticians and their work. T. Emmons, W.S. Vucinich (Eds.). The Zemstvo in Russia. An Experiment in Local Self-Government. Cambridge; 1982.
  49. Kerans D. Mind and Labor on the Farm in Black-Earth Russia, 1861-1914. Budapest; 2001.
  50. Khitrina N.E. Agrarian Policy of the Provisional Government in 1917. Nizhny Novgorod; 2003. (In Russ.).
  51. Kingston-Mann E. In Search of the True West. Culture, Economics, and Problems of Russian Development. Princeton; 1999.
  52. Kotsonis Ya. How the Peasants Were Made Backward. Agricultural Cooperatives and the Agrarian Question in Russia 1861-1914. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
  53. Kuznetsov I.A. Essays on the History of Agricultural Economics in Russia: 19th - early 20th Century. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.).
  54. League of Agrarian Reforms. Land Reform Authorities. Land Committees and the League of Agrarian Reforms. Moscow; 1917. (In Russ.).
  55. Littlejohn G. Peasant economy and society. Sociological Theories of the Economy. London; 1977.
  56. Makarov N.P. Peasant Economy and Its Evolution. Moscow; 1920. Vol. 1. (In Russ.).
  57. Makhrova A.G., Nefedova T.G., Treivish A.I. Polarization of the Central-Russian megalopolis’s space and population mobility. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Geography Series. 2016; 5. (In Russ.).
  58. Manuilov A.A. Land Lease in Russia in Economic Terms. Saint Petersburg; 1903. (In Russ.).
  59. Methodology and Techniques of the Systematic Study of the Soviet Village. Novosibirsk; 1980. (In Russ.).
  60. Miner H. The folk-urban continuum. American Sociological Review. 1952; 17.
  61. Montmarquet J.A. Philosophical foundations for agrarianism. Agriculture and Human Values. 1985; 2.
  62. Moon D. The Russian Peasantry 1600-1930. The World the Peasants Made. London; 1999.
  63. Morris W. Art and Life. Moscow; 1973. (In Russ.).
  64. Murray C. Social capital and cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe - a framework for research on governance. Journal of Rural Cooperation. 2008; 1.
  65. Narykova N.M. Agrarian economics and rural society of foreign countries in the assessments of contemporaries (the first half of the 20th century). Issues of History. 2020; 6. (In Russ.).
  66. Nefedova T.G. Rural Russia at a Crossroads. Moscow; 2003. (In Russ.).
  67. Nefedova T.G. Ten Actual Questions about Rural Russia: Answers of the Geographer. Moscow; 2013. (In Russ.).
  68. Nikulin A. James Scott and Alexander Chayanov: From the peasantry through revolutions, to the states, and anarchies. Russian Sociological Review. 2022; 21 (3). (In Russ.).
  69. Nikulin A.M. Agrarian ideologies of fascism among alternatives of rural development in the 1920s-1930s. ECO. 2020; 6. (In Russ.).
  70. Nikulin A.M. Analysis of Henry Ford’s projects of rural-urban development. SpiritualMoral Education. 2022; 6. (In Russ.).
  71. Nikulin, A., Trotsuk, I. Political and apolitical dimensions of Russian rural development: Populism “from above” and narodnik small deeds “from below”. Politics and Policies of Rural Authenticity. P. Pospěch, E.M. Fuglestad, E. Figueiredo (Eds.). Routledge; 2022.
  72. Oganovsky N. How the peasants should discuss the land question. News of the Main Land Committee. 1917; 4-5. (In Russ.).
  73. Osamu I. (Ed.). Transformation and Diversification of Rural Societies in Eastern Europe and Russia. Hokkaido; 2002.
  74. Patnaik U. Neo-populism and Marxism. The Chayanovian view of the agrarian question and its fundamental fallacy. Journal of Peasant Studies. 1979; 6.
  75. Peasants’ Voices: Rural Russia of the 20th Century in Peasants’ Memoirs. Moscow; 1996. (In Russ.).
  76. Politburo and the Labor Peasant Party. Moscow; 2021. (In Russ.).
  77. Proceedings of the I All-Russian Agricultural Congress. Vol. 1. Kiev; 1913. (In Russ.).
  78. Proceedings of the I All-Russian Congress of Workers of Small Credit and Agricultural Cooperation. Saint Petersburg; 1912. (In Russ.).
  79. Proceedings of the Moscow Regional Congress of Agronomic Assistance. Moscow; 1911. (In Russ.).
  80. Quesnay F. Selected Economic works. Moscow; 1960. (In Russ.).
  81. Report of the Moscow People’s University named after A.L. Shanyavsky for the 1910-1911 academic year. Moscow; 1911. (In Russ.).
  82. Ryvkina R. Sociology of the village. Sociology in Russia. Moscow; 1998. (In Russ.).
  83. Samsonov V.V. Similar trends in Russia’s rural development in the early 20th and 21st centuries and their reflection in the Russian rural sociology. Science. Art. Culture. 2018; 3. (In Russ.).
  84. Schultz H. Einleitung. Proteus Agrarismus. Bauerngesellschaften auf dem Weg in die Moderne. Agrarismus in Ostmitteleuropa 1880 bis 1960. Wiesbaden; 2010.
  85. Shanin T. (Ed.) Late Marx and the Russian Road: Marx and the “Peripheries of Capitalism”. New York; 1983.
  86. Shanin T. Defining Peasants: Essays Concerning Rural Societies, Expolary Economies, and Learning from Them in the Contemporary World. Blackwell; 1990.
  87. Sheptun A. The German historical school and Russian economic thought. Journal of Economic Studies. 2005; 32 (4).
  88. Sobolev A., Kurakin A., Pakhomov V., Trotsuk I. Cooperation in rural Russia: Past, present and future. Universe of Russia: Sociology, Ethnology. 2018; 27 (1).
  89. Social-Demographic Development of the Village. Moscow; 1986. (In Russ.).
  90. Sorokin P., Zimmerman C.C., Galpin C.J. A Systematic Source Book in Rural Sociology. University of Minnesota Press; 1930. Vol. 1.
  91. Sorokin P.A. Ideology of Agrarianism. Prague; 1924.
  92. Sorokin P.A., Zimmerman C.C. Principles of Rural-Urban Sociology. New York; 1929.
  93. Stanziani A. Russian economists abroad in 1880-1914. Ideas about the market and the circulation of ideas. Scherrer Yu., Ananyich B. (Eds.). Russian Emigration Before 1917. Laboratory of the Liberal-Revolutionary Thought. Saint Petersburg; 1997.
  94. Thaer A.D. The Principles of Rational Agriculture. Moscow; 1832. Vol. 2. (In Russ.).
  95. Thünen von J.H. The Isolated State. Moscow; 1926. (In Russ.).
  96. Treivish A.I. Rural-urban continuum: The fate of representation and its connection with the spatial mobility of the population. Demographic Review. 2016; 3 (1). (In Russ.).
  97. Valentinov V. Toward a social capital theory of co-operative organization. Journal of Cooperative Studies. 2004; 37 (3).
  98. Wehner M. Bauernpolitik im proletarischen Staat. Die Bauernfrage als zentrales Problem der sowjetischen Innenpolitik 1921-1928. Köln; 1998.
  99. Yakovlev S.I. The concept of rural-urban continuum: New methods for assessing settlement. Bulletin of the Tver State University. Geography and Geoecology Series. 2021; 3. (In Russ.).
  100. Zimmerman С.С. Sociological Theories of Pitirim A. Sorokin. New York; 1974.
  101. Zweynert J. Zur russischen Thünen-Rezeption. Johann Heinrich von Thünen (1783-1850). Thünensches Gedankengut in Theorie und Praxis. Münster; 2002.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».