Justice and inequality in the household consumption in Russia and China: A comparative analysis
- Authors: Kozyreva P.M.1,2, Zhu D.3, Nizamova A.E.1,2, Smirnov A.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
- HSE University
- Institute of Sociology of CASS
- Issue: Vol 21, No 1 (2021)
- Pages: 50-67
- Section: Contemporary society: the urgent issues and prospects for development
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-2272/article/view/322738
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2021-21-1-50-67
- ID: 322738
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The authors conducted a comparative analysis of the household consumption in Russia and China on the basis of the reputable empirical information sources. The article focuses on the main trends and peculiarities in how households from each country differed in terms of the structure and level of consumption under dramatic transformations associated with market reforms. Inequality in consumption in Russia and China, which can be characterized as high or excessive, largely determines the overall situation with social inequality and significantly influences the development of state social policy in various fields. As for the most differentiating items of expenditure for both countries, those are groceries, durable goods, public utility payments, cultural activities and entertainment. After noting the effect that income has on consumption, which is undeniable, though differs in nature and degree, the authors focus on other factors of this type of inequality, in particular, on the territorial, regional and settlement-specific characteristics of consumption inequality in both countries. The authors argue that in Russia, there is significant regional inequality in consumption, while in China such inequality is more settlement-specific; there are also differences in consumption inequality between urban and rural areas, which contribute to the overall situation with social inequality. In China, urban household expenditures are growing much faster than those of rural households, while in Russia the difference is not that pronounced. That said, the share of spending on groceries in the structure of expenditures is decreasing more rapidly in urban China, and compared to Russia, there is a smaller gap between urban and rural areas. At the same time in China, consumption inequality as a result of age and class differences is a much more acute issue, while in Russia, the differences caused by intensifying economic stratification seem to be a more important factor of inequality.
About the authors
P. M. Kozyreva
Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS; HSE University
Author for correspondence.
Email: pkozyreva@isras.ru
доктор социологических наук, первый заместитель директора Института социологии Федерального научно-исследовательского социологического центра Российской академии наук; заведующая Центром лонгитюдных обследований Института социальной политики Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики»
Myasnitskaya St., 20, Moscow, 101000, RussiaDi Zhu
Institute of Sociology of CASS
Email: zhudi123@cass.org.cn
доктор философии (социология); заместитель директора Департамента исследований молодежи Института социологии
Jian Guo Men Nei Da Jie, 5, Beijing, 100732, ChinaA. E. Nizamova
Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS; HSE University
Email: anizamova@hse.ru
кандидат социологических наук, главный эксперт Центра лонгитюдных обследований Института социальной политики Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики»; старший научный сотрудник Института социологии Федерального научно-исследовательского центра Российской академии наук
Myasnitskaya St., 20, Moscow, 101000, RussiaA. I. Smirnov
Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
Email: smir_al@bk.ru
доктор социологических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник Института социологии
Krzhizhanovskogo St., 24/35-5, Moscow, 117218, RussiaReferences
- Aganbegyan A.G. Overcoming poverty and reducing the income and consumption inequalities in Russia. ECO. 2017; 47 (9). (In Russ.).
- Banerjee A.V., Duflo E. What is middle class about the middle classes around the world. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2008; 22 (2).
- Chen Dong, Wang Mengdi. Did aging aggravate the consumption inequality among Chinese urban residents? Analysis based on age effect adjustment model. Journal of Hebei University (Philosophy and Social Sciences). 2018; 5. (In Chinese).
- Chen Zhiwu. Quantitative history and new knowledge revolution: An overview of quantitative studies on the history of human inequality. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences). 2018; 4. (In Chinese).
- Gordievich T.I., Ruzanov P.V. Inflation and consumption in equality in 2012-2017. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series: Society. History. Modernity. 2018; 4. (In Russ.).
- Gorshkov M.K. Social inequalities as an object of sociological analysis. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2014; 7. (In Russ.).
- Huang Weiwei, Lu Qian. Decomposition of income impact on the inequality of food expenditure of urban residents. Consumer Economics. 2014; 4. (In Chinese).
- Ibragimova Z.Е., Yaparova-Abdulkhalikova G.I. Structure of consumer expenditures in the context of inequality. Bulletin of USPTU. Science, Education, Economy. Series: Economy. 2016; 3. (In Russ.).
- Krasilova A.N. Social capital as an instrument of the analysis of inequality in the Russian society. Mir Rossii. 2007; 16 (4). (In Russ.).
- Lin Xiaoshan. Family aging, consumption structure and consumption stratification - data analysis based on CFPS2012. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science). 2018; 2. (In Chinese).
- Micheletti M., Stolle D., Follesdal A. (Eds.). Politics, Products and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present. New Brunswick; 2006.
- Model of Income Stratification for the Russian Society: Dynamics, Factors, Cross-Country Comparisons. Moscow-Saint Petersburg; 2018. (In Russ.).
- Ovcharova L.N., Biryukova S.S., Ter-Akopov S.A., Vardanyan E.G. What Has Changed in Earnings, Expenses and Consumption of the Russian Population. Moscow; 2014.
- Pshizova S.N. From “civil society” to “consumer’s community”: Political consumerism in the comparative perspective. Part 1. Political Studies. 2009; 1. (In Russ.).
- Scammell M. The Internet and civic engagement: The age of the citizen-consumer. Political Communication. 2000; 17 (4).
- Shkaratan O. Social-economic inequality in the contemporary world and the development of new types of social stratification in Russia. Mir Rossii. 2018; 27 (2). (In Russ.).
- Song Ze, He Yang. Measurement and decomposition of consumption inequality among middle-aged and elderly people: Empirical evidence from CHARLS. Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics. 2019; 3. (In Chinese).
- Starr M.A. The social economics of ethical consumption: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Journal of Socio-Economics. 2009; 38 (6).
- Sun Hao, Mao Zhonggen. Multi-dimensional decomposition and causal analysis of consumption inequality in China. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics. 2017; 11. (In Chinese).
- Sun Hao, Hu Zhijun, Chen Jiandong. Estimates of consumption Gini coefficient and analysis of social welfare in China. Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics. 2017; 12. (In Chinese).
- Russians and Chinese in an Era of Change. A Comparative Study in Saint Petersburg and Shanghai in the Early 21st Century. Moscow; 2012. (In Russ.).
- Wang Qiyan, Wei Jiajia. Study of the inequality in leisure consumption on the example of Beijing. Economic Theory and Business Management. 2019; 5. (In Chinese).
- Zhao Guangchuan, Chao Ma. The impact of rural residents’ income on the inequality in healthcare consumption in China. Consumer Economics. 2019; 5. (In Chinese).
- Zou Hong, Li Aolei, Yu Kaizhi. Measurement, birth cohort decomposition and development of consumption inequality mechanism: Discussions on income inequality. China Economic Quarterly. 2013; 4. (In Chinese).
- Zubova L.G. Inequality and poverty in Russia: Dynamics, causes, and a need to overcome. Narodonaselenie. 2017; 3. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
