The G20’s Low-Carbon Development Agenda: A Historical Perspective and Key Concepts
- Authors: Popova I.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian Presidential Academy on National Economy and Public Administration
- Issue: Vol 25, No 4 (2025): Humanitarian Aspects of Modern International Relations
- Pages: 668-683
- Section: ENERGY DIMENSIONS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2313-0660/article/view/365349
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2025-25-4-668-683
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HWBLLX
- ID: 365349
Cite item
Abstract
The article analyses the transformation of the G20 agenda on climate, energy, and just transition from the earliest summits up to 2024. The relevance of the study stems from the fact that the G20 is one of the leading institutions of global economic governance, including in the eld of climate policy. Examining the documents adopted by the leaders of member states, as well as those produced within the main ministerial cooperation tracks, makes it possible to identify the key factors and turning points in the transformation, strengthening, and expansion of the climate agenda within the institution, as well as the contradictions between members. The study employs the method of comparative analysis to assess the G20’s activities in promoting low-carbon development, as well as content analysis of the nal summit documents. The research demonstrates that the G20 plays an important role in the development of global governance in the eld of low-carbon development. At the early summits, the priority issues were sustainable, inclusive, and equitable ‘green’ growth and recovery, and the need to consider climate impacts when designing policy was emphasized. Following the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015, climate issues, the energy transition, and decarbonisation nancing became separate areas and independent goals of the G20, e ectively detached from the broader theme of economic growth. This approach, whereby emissions reduction is essentially separated from the need to ensure economic growth, reached its peak during Italy’s presidency in 2021, when the G7, under pressure from the European Union (EU) and the United States, which had joined forces to promote their preferred vision of climate governance, attempted to transfer its decisions to the G20 agenda. However, such an approach, in which growth and decarbonisation are treated as separate objectives, does not allow for full consideration of national contexts, as required by the Paris Agreement and previous G20 commitments. The existing contradictions within the G20, which are becoming increasingly pronounced, as well as the G7’s desire to impose its decisions and agenda on the G20, are undermining the institution’s e ectiveness and jeopardize its legitimacy and leadership in ensuring low-carbon development.
About the authors
Irina M. Popova
Russian Presidential Academy on National Economy and Public Administration
Author for correspondence.
Email: popova-im@ranepa.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0849-7168
SPIN-code: 8106-0481
Researcher, Centre for International Institutions Research of the Institute of Applied Economic Research
11 Prechistenskaya embankment, Moscow, 119034, Russian FederationReferences
- Basangov, L. L., & Ignatov, A. A. (2019). Saudi Arabia’s G20 presidency in 2020. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 19(4), 654–662. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-4-654-662; EDN: HNOWXT
- Fues, T. (2017). Recalibrating the G20’s mission towards sustainable development: Opportunities and challenges for the German presidency. International Organisations Research Journal, 12(2), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2017-02-34; EDN: ZDQFPF
- Goodliffe, G., & Sberro, S. (2012). The G20 after Los Cabos: Illusions of global economic governance. The International Spectator, 47(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2012.733181
- Johnstone, I. (2021). The G20, climate change and COVID-19: Critical juncture or critical wound? Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy, 1(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/FREP-05-2021-0031; EDN: EMWHAI
- Kim, J. A., & Chung, S. Y. (2012). The role of the G20 in governing the climate change regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 12(4), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-012-9173-2; EDN: BNIIPH
- Kirton, J. (2020). Globalization’s implications for G20 governance. International Organisations Research Journal, 15(2), 24–54. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-02-02; EDN: XWFSFZ
- Kirton, J. J., & Kokotsis, E. (2015). The global governance of climate change: G7, G20, and UN leadership. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
- Kirton, J., & Warren, B. (2021). From silos to synergies: G20 governance of the SDGs, climate change & digitalization. International Organisations Research Journal, 16(2), 20–54. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2021-02-03; EDN: YKSQLV
- Kirton, J., & Warren, B. (2022). Governing climate change at the G20 Rome and UN Glasgow summits and beyond. International Organisations Research Journal, 17(2), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2022-02-05; EDN: AKUNWR
- Kokotsis, E. (2017). The Gx contribution to global climate governance. Studia Diplomatica, 68(3), 79–96. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26531658
- Larionova, M. V. (2017). Germany G20 presidency. The test by Trump. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 17(4), 807–823. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2017-17-4-807-823; EDN: ZWPRUZ
- Larionova, M. V. (2019). Results of the G20 summit: Mitigation of risks. Russian Economic Developments, 26(7), 7–12. (In Russian). EDN: SLUGVX
- Larionova, M. V. (2022). A brief history of the G20 institutional dynamics (2008–2021). International Organisations Research Journal, 17(2), 250–274. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2022-02-11; EDN: BVBNKO
- Larionova, M. V. (2023). G20 at the critical juncture. Indonesia’s 2022 presidency: Internal and external shocks, risks of power rebalancing and eventual demise, causes of resilience and re-equilibrium. International Organisations Research Journal, 18(1), 33–74. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2023-01-02; EDN: SKTHYX
- Luckhurst, J. (2021). Networked G20 governance of COVID-19 and its transversal crisis effect. International Organisations Research Journal, 16(3), 34–68. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2021-03-02; EDN: XAFIQM
- Mahida, R., & Chauhan, S. (2023). A study on presidency of the G20 in India: SWOC analysis. Vidya: A Journal of Gujarat University, 2(2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.47413/vidya.v2i2.188; EDN: FCQERS
- Nahón, C. (2018). Latin America in the G20: Continuities and ruptures of the regional agenda (2008–2018). International Organisations Research Journal, 13(4), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-04-02; EDN: YMYUZP
- Nascimento, L., Kuramochi, T., Iacobuta, G., den Elzen, M., Fekete, H., & et al. (2021). Twenty years of climate policy: G20 coverage and gaps. Climate Policy, 22(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1993776; EDN: SWOGTA
- Sainsbury, T., & Wurf, H. (2016). The G20 and the future of energy governance. International Organisations Research Journal, 11(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845/2016-01-7; EDN: VRWFOZ
- Umar, H., & Indrayani, I. (2022). Indonesian presidency at the G20 forum. Journal of Social Political Sciences, 3(4), 443–454. Retrieved from https://e-journal.unas.ac.id/index.php/jsps/article/view/142
- Unger, Ch., & Thielges, S. (2021). Preparing the playing field: Climate club governance of the G20, Climate and Clean Air Coalition, and Under2 Coalition. Climatic Change, 167(3–4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03189-8; EDN: CDYHTN
- Yu, H. (2017). G20 and the reform of global energy governance. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 3(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740017500142
Supplementary files

