Latin America: From the “Washington” to the “Cornwall Consensus”

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The research examines the proposals of the “Cornwall Consensus” in the context of their possible application in Latin America. The authors argue that these proposals could contribute to the development of a new economic development strategy for the post-liberal period. It is likely that the “Cornwall Consensus” proposals become dominant in shaping the global agenda on the new economic paradigm. Although it is important to mention that nowadays there also also “Beijing” and “Delhi” consensuses those are linked to the Chinese and Indian models of economic liberalization and constitute an alternative to the “Washington Consensus”. The article analyzes the effectiveness of the “Washington Consensus” adjustment mechanism, carries out a comparative analysis of the Latin American economies that pursued both liberal and statist development models. Then the article examines the main recommendations and ideas of the “Cornwall Consensus”, the prospects of adapting the Latin American region to the proposals of a new development model against the background of existing experience in implementing the recommendations of the “Washington Consensus”, its consequences and existing “post-neoliberal” alternatives. The authors conclude that, despite the adaptability of the Latin American economies, the question remains whether the proposals of the “Cornwall Consensus” can contribute to the revival of the development policy in Latin America aimed at creating a new type of “welfare state”? The study concludes that the proposals of the “Cornwall Consensus” could contribute to the formulation of a new development policy, since the “welfare state” in its Latin American version, regardless of whether “neoliberal” or “progressive”, has exhausted itself.

About the authors

Yury N. Moseykin

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: moseykin-yun@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1285-1473

Dr. of Sc. (Economics), Professor, Head, the Department of the National Economy, Dean, Faculty of Economics

Moscow, Russian Federation

Elvis Ojeda Calluni

Oruro Technical University

Email: eojeda@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0829-1298

PhD (Economics), Visiting Professor

Oruro, Bolivia

Marina N. Moseykina

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: moseykina-mn@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9279-4079

Dr. of Sc. (History), Professor, Head, the Department of the Russian History

Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Ananyin, O. I., Khaitkulov, R. G., & Shestakov, D. E. (2010). Washington Consensus: Landscape after battles. World Economy and International Relations, (12), 15-27. (In Russian).
  2. Bazhenova, E. S. (2009). 30 years of reforms in the PRC: Results, problems, prospects. Asia and Africa Today, (2), 41-49. (In Russian).
  3. Berger, Ya. M. (2009). Chinese model of development. World Economy and International Relations, (9), 71-81. (In Russian).
  4. Borokh, O. N., & Lomanov, A. V. (2005). New socialism of Hu Jintao and PRC’s modern ideology. Pro et Contra, (2), 20-39. (In Russian).
  5. Davydov, V. M. (2016). Determination of development of Latin America and Caribbean. Pairing of the global and regional problematics. Moscow: ILA RAN publ. (In Russian).
  6. Davydov, V. M. (Ed.). (2022). Prospects of sustainable development. An appeal to global and Latin American realities. Moscow: Ves’ mir publ. (In Russian).
  7. Degterev, D. A. (2021). Non-Western theories of development in the global capitalism era. World Economy and International Relations, 65(4), 113-122. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-4-113-122
  8. Draibe, S., & Riesco, M. (2009). El Estado de bienestar social en América Latina: Una nueva estrategia de desarrollo. Fundación Carolina. Documento de Trabajo, (31), 1-123. Retrieved from https://www.fundacioncarolina.es/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/DT31.pdf
  9. Galishcheva, N. V. (2014). “Delhi Consensus” - the Indian model of economic liberalization. Asia and Africa Today, (3), 2-8. (In Russian).
  10. Gelbras, V. (2009). Thirty years of “Reform and Opening” epoch in China. World Economy and International Relations, (6), 73-83. (In Russian).
  11. Gereffi, G. (2014). Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 9-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.756414
  12. Hayek, F. A. von. (2005). The road to serfdom. Moscow: Novoye izdatel’stvo publ. (In Russian).
  13. Klein, E., & Morreo, C. E. (Eds.). (2019). Postdevelopment in practice: Alternatives, economies, ontologies. London: Routledge.
  14. Lopatina, A. N. (2010). From “Washington Consensus” to “Beijing Consensus”. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, (9), 59-71. (In Russian).
  15. Ramo, J. C. (2004). The Beijing Consensus. London: The Foreign Policy Center.
  16. Ren, H. (2010). The neoliberal state and risk society: The Chinese state and the middle class. Telos, (151), 105-128. https://doi.org/10.3817/0610151105
  17. Rhonheimer, M. (2017). Libertad económica, capitalismo y ética cristiana. Madrid: Unión Editorial.
  18. Stiglitz, J. (1998). More instruments and broader goals: Moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (8), 4-34. (In Russian).
  19. Stiglitz, J. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. Moscow: Mysl’ publ. (In Russian).
  20. Stiglitz, J. E. (2008). Is there a Post-Washington Consensus consensus? In N. Serra & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), The Washington Consensus reconsidered: Towards a new global governance (pp. 41-56). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534081.003.0004
  21. Vinogradov, A. V., Degterev, D. A., Spirina, D. V., & Trusova, A. A. (2018). “Beijing Consensus” in international and domestic political discourse. Far Eastern Studies, (3), 17-28. (In Russian).
  22. Williamson, J. (1990). Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).