Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring: A Plea for Changing Environmental Policy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Analyzes how Rachel Carson’s 1962 book Silent Spring significantly influenced the Change in Environmental Policy. Historically, when academics talk about attempts to change environmental policy, they primarily focus on the contributions of natural and social scientists who assess the effects of pollution and other harmful factors on the environmental response to the increased use of pesticides in the 1960s, Carson produced her cross-disciplinary book, which combined environmental science and narrative. Silent Spring was able to influence and start changes in the laws governing chemical insect control and the outlawing of the synthetic pesticide DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane). By challenging the conventional wisdom that viewed man as the master and master of nature, Carson’s book changed policy and inspired new research, demonstrating that the overuse of pesticides is both dangerous and immoral. Her book is considered a founding work of the contemporary environmental movement. The links between science, literature, and public participation that have the potential to increase public understanding of the significance of environmental literature as a tool for influencing environmental policy is the issue this paper has explored in the novel. Applying qualitative research design, this article critically examines and analyzes the environment from a crossdisciplinary approach, using Silent Spring as an exemplary case of a literary text that can affect environmental policy, both in the academic and, more crucially, in real life. Lawrence Buell’s critical insights on the environmental realities that the text portrays serve as a theoretical perspective to analyze the novel.

About the authors

Ravindra Neupane

Tribhuvan University

Email: epedagogy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-9180-9255

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of English

Ratna Rajyalaxmi Campus, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, 44613, Nepal

Vasily V. Verkhoturov

Kaliningrad State Technical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: epedagogy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2979-9867

Grand PhD in Pedagogy, Professor at the Department of Pedagogy

1 Sovetsky Prospekt, Kaliningrad, 236022, Russian Federation

References

  1. Bryson, M.A. (2003). Nature, Narrative, and the Scientist-Writer: Rachel Carson’s and Loren Eiseley’s Critique of Science. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1204_2
  2. Buell, L. (2005). The Future of Environmental Criticism. Blackwell.
  3. Carlo, G.L. (2000). Radio waves, wireless signals, and public health: Is this the next silent spring? Environmental Claims Journal, 12(4), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10406020009355139
  4. Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton.
  5. Gartner, C.B. (2000). When Science Writing Becomes Literary Art: The Success of Silent Spring. In C. Waddell (Ed.), And No Birds Sing: Rhetorical Analysis of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring (pp. 103–225). Southern Illinois UP.
  6. Gay, H. (2012). Before and After Silent Spring: From Chemical Pesticides to Biological Control and Integrated Pest Management – Britain, 1945–1980. Ambix, 59(2), 88–108. https://
  7. doi.org/10.1179/174582312X13345259995930
  8. Gore, A. (1962). Introduction. Silent Spring. By Rachel Carson. Houghton Mifflin.
  9. Graham, F.Jr. (1970). Since Silent Spring. Houghton.
  10. Gunter, V.J. (2005). News Media and Technological Risks: The Case of Pesticides after Silent Spring. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(4), 671–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/
  11. j.1533-8525.2005.00031.x
  12. Killingsworth, J.M., & Jacqueline, P.S. (2000). Silent Spring and Science Fiction: An Essay in the History and Rhetoric of Narrative. In Craig Waddell (Ed.), And No Birds Sing: Rhetorical Analyses of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring (pp. 174–204). Southern Illinois UP.
  13. Lytle, M.H. (2007). The Gentle Subversive: Rachel Carson, Silent Spring, and the Rise of the Environmental Movement. Oxford UP.
  14. Massey, A. (2021). Editorial: Silent Spring: can we fix wicked problems? Public Money & Management, 42(2), 53–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2003595
  15. McCay, M.A. (1993). Rachel Carson. Twayne.
  16. Meyer, C.A. (2021). Taking Lessons from Silent Spring: Using Environmental Literature for Climate Change. Literature, 1(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/literature1010002
  17. Montefiore, J. (2001). ‘The fact that possesses my imagination’: Rachel Carson, Science and Writing. Women: A Cultural Review, 12(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/
  18. Murphy, M.K. (2018). Scientific argument without a scientific consensus: Rachel Carson’s rhetorical strategies in the Silent Spring debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 55(3), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2018.1429065
  19. Murphy, M.K. (2024). Sublime Wonder: Rachel Carson, Nature Writing, and Human-Nature Connection. Western Journal of Communication, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2024.2366213
  20. Papers of John F. Kennedy. (1963, May 15). Presidential Papers. President’s Office Files. Departments and Agencies. President’s Science Advisory Committee (PSAC): Pesticides report.
  21. Savory, E. (2024). Rachel Carson’s Strategies for Literary Science and Silent Spring. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 66(3), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2024.2319633
  22. Wills-Toker, C. (2003). The Environmental Rhetoric of Rachel Carson. Review of Commu­nication, 3(3), 293–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308407

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).