电邮这篇文章 
North-Eastern India (NER) as an example of “clash of civilizations”
- 作者: Mikhailov S.A.1
-
隶属关系:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
- 期: 卷 12, 编号 4 (2020)
- 页面: 324-337
- 栏目: Oriental Studies
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2312-8127/article/view/317258
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2020-12-4-324-337
- ID: 317258
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
This article attempts to analyze the current situation in North-Eastern India (NER) in the light of well-known concept “clash of civilizations” developed by S. Huntington (the American political scientist and proponent of the modern version of the civilizational approach to History). One may say that even a superficial glance at NER problems demonstrates a very characteristic example of the visual manifestation of this concept. The relevance of the work implies the possibilities of practical application of this concept for the analysis of India and NER existing ethnic and religious problems as well as the best ways to solve them. The author (besides S. Huntington’s work “Clash of civilizations”) used the works of the Russian indologists - S. Baranov (“Separatism in India”), B. Klyuyev (“Religion and conflict in India”), K. Likhachev (“Ethnic separatism in NER: old problems in the new century”) and the book of the Indian specialist on separatism in NER S. Bhaumik (“Troubled periphery: crisis of India’s North East”) as well as other sources.
作者简介
S. Mikhailov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: wetter248@mail.ru
postgraduate student of the Chair of the World history
10-2 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation参考
- Mitroshenkov O.A. Kul’tura i civilizaciya (materialy lekcii). Zhurnal «Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo». T. 2(3). M., 2000.
- Braudel Fernand. Ecrits sur l’histoire. Paris, 2013.
- Dal’majr F. Global’naya etika: preodolenie dihotomii «universalizm – partikulyarizm». M., 2004. (In Russ.).
- Chislennost’ naseleniya Indii. URL: http://www.statdata.ru/naselenie-indii-chislennost. [Accessed: 11.03.2020]. (In Russ.).
- Das S.K. Purvattara me samabeshi vikas [India Water Portal]. (In Hindi).
- Buras M., Krongauz M. Zhizn’ i sud’ba gipotezy lingvisticheskoj otnositel’nosti. Zhurnal «Nauka i zhizn’», (8). M., 2011.
- Hajdegger M. Vremya i bytie. Stat’i i vystupleniya. M.: Respublika, 1993.
- Naselenie Indii [Pew Research Center. The Global Religious Landscape]. URL: https://countrymeters.info/ru/India. [Accessed: 17.02.2020]. (In Russ.).
- Dannye perepisi naseleniya Indii 2011 goda (URL: https://censusindia.gov.in/2011-Common/CensusData2011.html). [Accessed 15.02.2020]. (In Russ.).
- Dyumulen Genrih. Istoriya dzen-buddizma. M.: Centrpoligraf, 2003. URL: https://lenta.ru/ articles/2019/12/09/buddha_dhamma/. [Accessed: 17.04.2020]. (In Russ.).
- Melikova K.A. Konfucianstvo i vzaimootnosheniya pokolenij v Drevnem Kitae. Lokus: lyudi, obshchestvo, kul’tury, smysly. M., 2014. (In Russ.).
- Dannye perepisi naseleniya Indii 2011 goda (URL: https://censusindia.gov.in/2011-Common/CensusData2011.html). [Accessed: 15.02.2020]. (In Russ.).
- Veber M. Protestantskaya etika i duh kapitalizma. M.: «Progress», 1990.
- Baranov S.A. Separatizm v Indii. M.: IV RAN, 2003.
- Hantington S. Stolknovenie civilizacij. M.: AST, 2003.
- Abramov D.B. Svetskoe gosudarstvo i religioznyj radikalizm v Indii. M.: IMEMO RAN, 2011.
- Bhaumik Subir. Troubled periphery: crisis of India’s North East. New Delhi, 2009. URL: https://iz.ru/906977/aleksei-kupriianov/smena-statusa-pochemu-dzhammu-i-kashmir-perestal-byt-shtatom. [Accessed: 05.05.2020]. (In Russ.).
- Yurlova E.S. Indiya. Kasty v politike. M.: IV RAN, 2017.
补充文件
