Bellum Parthicum of the emperor Trajan: a contest with the ghost of Alexander?
- Авторлар: Parfyonov V.N.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary
- Шығарылым: Том 17, № 3 (2025): Antiquity in the Mediterranean Region and pre-Columbian America
- Беттер: 286-305
- Бөлім: LAW AND POWER IN ANCIENT ROME
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2312-8127/article/view/332263
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2025-17-3-286-305
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TLAHSH
- ID: 332263
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
The last and largest campaign of Emperor Trajan, his Parthian War, is fraught with many mysteries for the researcher, which is primarily explained by the state of the source base. The purpose of the war, the plans of the parties, the sequence of events that unfolded, and Trajan’s further intentions after the unexpectedly easy capture of Armenia and Mesopotamia are unclear. The purpose of this study is to clarify these issues to the extent that the available sources allow. The popular opinion is criticized that the emperor, planning and starting this war, took advantage of the plans of his predecessors and intended to repeat the eastern campaign of Alexander the Great. It is proved that the immediate goal of the war was the annexation of Armenia, the traditional “apple of discord” between Rome and Parthia. However, the exceptionally favorable situation due to the war between the pretenders to the Parthian throne allowed Trajan to transfer the fighting after the capture of Armenia to the territory of Mesopotamia. The last and largest campaign of Emperor Trajan, his Parthian War, is fraught with many mysteries for the researcher, which is primarily explained by the state of the source base. The purpose of the war, the plans of the parties, the sequence of events that unfolded, and Trajan’s further intentions after the unexpectedly easy capture of Armenia and Mesopotamia are unclear. The purpose of this study is to clarify these issues to the extent that the available sources allow. The popular opinion is criticized that the emperor, planning and starting this war, took advantage of the plans of his predecessors and intended to repeat the eastern campaign of Alexander the Great. It is proved that the immediate goal of the war was the annexation of Armenia, the traditional “apple of discord” between Rome and Parthia. The situation that developed extremely favorably due to the war between the pretenders to the Parthian throne allowed Trajan to transfer the fighting after the capture of Armenia to the territory of Mesopotamia, capture the Parthian capital Ctesiphon and reach the coast of the Persian Gulf. Considering the war already won, the emperor did not intend to continue the land campaign to the East, as there were no necessary resources for this. Instead, Trajan was going to transfer the war to the sea and make a naval expedition to India, thereby surpassing the achievements of Alexander the Great. However, further developments forced him to abandon these plans.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Victor Parfyonov
Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: vparfenov@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3612-0197
SPIN-код: 5162-6287
doctor of historical sciences, professor, professor of the Department of Church History
92 Michurina st, Saratov, 410028, Russian FederationӘдебиет тізімі
- Petit P. Histoire générale de l’Empire romain. 1. Le Haut-Empire (27 av. J.-C. — 161 apr. J.-C.). Paris: Éditions du Seuil; 1974.
- Debevoice NC. Politicheskaya istoriya Parfii [A Political History of Parthia]. Transl., ed. and bibliogr. of VP Nikonorov. Saint Peterburg: Filologicheskii fakultet SPbGU publ.; 2008. (In Russ.).
- Knyaz᾽kij IO. Imperator Trajan [The Emperor Trajan]. Saint Peterburg: Aleteiya publ.; 2016. (In Russ.). EDN: YNMCBR
- Egorov AB. Julij Tsezar᾽. Politicheskaya biografiya [Julius Caesar. The Political Biography]. Saint Peterburg: Nestor-Istoriya publ.; 2014. (In Russ.). EDN: VLJQUH
- Mommsen Th. Istoriya Rima. III. Ot smerti Sully do bitvy pri Tapse [The History of Rome. III. From the death of Sulla to the Battle of Thapsus]. Saint Peterburg: Nauka publ.; Iuventa publ.; 1995. (In Russ.).
- Rostovtzeff M. The Sarmatae and Parthians. In: Cambridge Ancient History. Cambridge; 1936. Vol. XI, pp. 91–130.
- Oller Guzmán J. Rex armeniis datus? Nero, Parthia and the ʽArmenian Question’. In: Antela-Bernárdez B, Vidal J, editors. Central Asia in Antiquity: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Oxford; 2014. P. 85–98.
- Cornell T. The end of Roman imperial expansion. In: Rich J, Shipley G, editors. War and Society in the Roman World. London; New York; 1993. P. 139–170.
- Olbrycht MJ. Das Arsakiderreich zwischen der mediterranen Welt und Innerasien. Bemerkungen zur politischen Strategie der Arsakiden von Vologases I. bis zum Herrschaftsantritt des Vologases III. (50–147 n. Chr). In: Dąbrowa E, editor. Ancient Iran and the mediterranean World. Studies in Ancient History. Proceedings on an international conference in honour of Professor Józef Wolski held at the Jagiellonian University, Cracow, in September 1996. Cracow; 1998. P. 123–159.
- Wolski J. Iran und Rom. Versuch einer historischen Wertung der gegenseitigen Beziehungen. In: Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. 2. Principat. Bd. 9. 1. Berlin; New York; 1976. P. 195–214.
- Debevoice NC. A Political History of Parthia. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press; 1938.
- Parfyonov VN. Trajan and the Revolt of Antonius Saturninus. RUDN Journal of World History. 2021;13(3):319–328. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8127-2021-13-3-319-328 EDN: HGYZMF
- Parfyonov VN. The Bosporan mission of Marcus Ulpius Primus. Ancient world and archaeology. 2009;13(13):349–354. (In Russ.). EDN: VBHPKP
- Filimonov NA. Rimskaya provintsiya Dakiya: administrativnoe ustroistvo i upravlencheskii apparat [The Roman province of Dacia: administrative structure and apparatus]. Diss. Yaroslavl᾽; 2023. (In Russ.).
- Chaumont ML. L’Arménie entre Rome et l’Iran: De l’avènement d’Auguste à l’avènement de Dioclétien. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. 2. Principat. Bd. 9. 1. Berlin; New York; 1976. P. 130–194.
- Bennett J. Trajanus Optimus Princeps. A Life and Times. London; New York: Routledge; 1997.
- Marek Chr. Rom und der Orient. Reiche. Götter. Könige. München: Beck; 2023.
- Sheldon RM. Rome’s Wars in Parthia: blood in the sand. London; Portland (Or.): Mitchell; 2010.
- Jackson N. Trajan: Rome’s Last Conqueror. Barnsley: Greenhill Books; 2022.
- Perevalov SM. Was there an ideological basis for the “national liberation” struggle of the Caucasian peoples against Rome?. In: Voina I sakral᾽nost᾽. Materialy Chetvertykh mezhdunarodnyh chtenii “Mir I voina: kul᾽turnye konteksty sozial᾽noi agressii”. Saint Peterburg – Vyborg – Staraya Ladoga. 1–4.10.2009. Moscow; Saint Peterburg; 2010. P. 37–40. (In Russ.).
- Longden RP. Notes on the Parthian Campaigns of Trajan. Journal of Roman Studies. 1931;(21):1–35.
- Parfyonov VN. The role of the “Armenian question” in Trajan’s Parthian adventure. Vestnik of Gorky Literary Institute. 2024;(2–3):189–202. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2408-9451-2024-2-3-1189-202 EDN: JJEOMO
- Grant M. Rimskie imperatory. Biograficheskii spravochnik pravitelei Rimskoi imperii 31 g. do n.e. — 476 g. n.e. [The Roman emperors. Biographical directory of the rulers of the Roman Empire 31 BC — 476 AD]. Transl. from Engl. by Gitt M. Мoscow: Terra, 1998. (In Russ.).
- Makhlaiuk AV. Rimskie voiny. Pod znakom Marsa [The Roman Wars. Under the sign of Mars]. Мoscow: Tsentrpoligraf publ.; 2002. (In Russ.). EDN: QPOCBV
- Smyshlyaev AL, Ukolova VI. Rim: epokha prinzipata [Rome: the Age of the Principate]. In: Golovina VA, Ukolova VI, editors. Vsemirnaya istoriya. Т. 1. Drevnii mir. Moscow: Nauka publ., 2011; p. 603–639. (In Russ.). EDN: RXIVOB
- Tsirkin YB. Politicheskaya istoriya Rimskoi imperii [The Political History of the Roman Empire]. Saint Peterburg: RPGU im. A.I. Gerzena; 2018. Vol. 1. (In Russ.).
- Egorov AB. Istoriya Drevnego Rima. Imperiya : kurs lektsii. [The History of Ancient Rome. Empire]: Saint Peterburg: Izd-vo SPbDA publ.; 2024. (In Russ.).
- Longden RP. The Wars of Traian. In: Cambridge Ancient History. Cambridge; 1936. Vol. XI, pp. 223–252.
- Webster G. The Roman Imperial Army of the first and second centuries A.D. London: Black; 1969.
- Alston R. Aspects of Roman History, AD 14–117. London; New York: Routledge; 1998.
- Speidel MA. Traian: Bellicosissimus Princeps. In: Speidel MA. Heer und Herrschaft im Römischen Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart; 2009, S. 121–165.
- Graham D. Trajan’s Parthian War. Classicum. 2014;40(1):35–39.
- Speidel MA. Provincia Armenia in the Light of the Epigraphic Evidence. Electrum. 2021;(28):135–150.
- Mattingly H, Sydenham EA. The Roman Imperial Coinage. Vol. II. Vespasian to Hadrian. London: Spink; 1926.
- Griffin M. Nerva to Hadrian. In: Cambridge Ancient History. 2nd ed. Cambridge; 2000. Vol. XI, pp. 84–131.
- Lightfoot CS. Trajan’s Parthian war and the fourth-century perspective. Journal of Roman Studies. 1990;(80):115–126.
- Hartmann U. Die Ziele der Orientpolitik Trajans. In: Rollinger R, editors. Interkulturalität in der Alten Welt. Vorderasien, Hellas, Ägypten und die vielfältigen Ebenen des Kontakts. Wiesbaden; 2010, S. 591–633.
- Kühnen A. Die imitatio Alexandri als politisches Instrument römischer Feldherren und Kaiser in der Zeit von der ausgehenden Republik bis zum Ende der dritten Jahrhunderts n. Chr. Diss. Duisburg–Essen: Univ.-Verlag, 2005.
- Birley AR. Hadrian. The restless emperor. London; New York: Routledge; 1997.
- Ball W. Rome in the East. The transformation of an empire. London; New York: Routledge; 2000.
- Seelentag G. Taten und Tugenden Traians. Herrschaftsdarstellung im Principat. Stuttgart: Steiner; 2004.
- Schwartz Ed. Flavius Arrianus. In: Wissowa G, editor. Paulyʼs Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Neue Bearbeitung. Stuttgart, 1895;(3). S. 1230–1247.
- Heucke H. Arrianos von Nikomedeia. In: Cancik H, Schneider H, editors. Der neue Pauly. Enzyclopädie der Antike. Stuttgart; Weimar, 1997;(2):27–30.
- Nefyodkin AK. Arrian: zhisn᾽ i tvorchestvo [Arrian: life and work]. In: Arrian. Takticheskie traktaty. Translation, commentary, introductory article by A.K. Nefyodkina. Saint Peterburg: Nestor–Istoriya publ.; 2010. P. 7–13. (In Russ.).
- Portmann W. Eutropius. In: Cancik H, Schneider H, editors. Der neue Pauly. Enzyclopädie der Antike. Stuttgart; Weimar; 1998;(4):322.
- Eigler U. Festus Rufus. In: Cancik H, Schneider H, editors. Der neue Pauly. Enzyclopädie der Antike. Stuttgart; Weimar; 1998;(4):495.
Қосымша файлдар
