LANDSCAPES OF THE WORLDS OF LIVING BEINGS: AN ECOSEMIOTIC APPROACH
- Authors: Knyazeva H.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research University Higher School of Economics
- Issue: No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 122-141
- Section: UNIVERSE AND MULTIVERSE
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2312-7899/article/view/270277
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2023-3-122-141
- ID: 270277
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article considers the meaning and content of the concept of ecological landscape. The author shows that the ecological landscapes of plant and animal organisms, fungi and microorganisms are built and modified through the processes of semiosis, signification of environmental elements and mutual recognition of signs. Landscapes are complex networks of interactions between organisms and with different types of environmental factors. The author argues that, for understanding the network interactions and communications of living organisms, the approaches from the network science and systems science are useful. Consideration of ecological landscapes from the perspective of complex systems opens up additional aspects of a possible analysis: spatial and temporal configurations of landscapes, elements of symmetry and asymmetry, order and chaos in them, their possible scale invariance, and the fractality of their structural organization. The concept of ecological landscape is correlated with the concept of ecological niche, a place occupied by a species in specific environmental conditions. When describing the coexistence of various organisms in a biocenosis in terms of niches, the author uses the concept of a fitness landscape or an adaptive landscape. She also analyzes the subtle nuances of meanings of the concepts “ecological landscape”, “ecological niche”, “habitat, “umwelt” and “eco-field, and “ecosemiosphere”, and the question of what determines the structure and diversity of the umwelts of living beings. Umwelt is the subjective world of perception and action of living beings belonging to the same species. Particular features of each individual are superimposed on the species-specific features of umwelts. Umwelt is built thanks to the active connection of a living organism and its environment, which it masters and turns into its own environment. Since environmental conditions are constantly changing, the umwelt of a living organism is partly rebuilt under the changing environmental conditions. A diachronically living organism lives in a plurality, a historical chain of states of its umwelt. There are several meanings in understanding the spatio-temporal properties of ecological landscapes and the interconnection of umwelts, the construction of landscape designs of nature. Curious features of the configuration of landscapes are short-range and long-range orders, the imposition of large and small scales, the division of ecological niches, cooperation and mutual assistance, and the synergy of living organisms. In the light of evolutionary holism, all types of umwelts (umwelts of plants, animals, human beings as social and cultural creatures) can be united and combined into a hierarchical ladder. An integral view entails an understanding of the need to promote global environmental ethics as a concern for the preservation of biological, social and cultural diversity, life and health of all parts and the whole of ecological landscape. By taking care of the whole, we take care of ourselves. By paying attention to and preserving the small in biological diversity, we support the sustainable development of large and global ecological entities and structures.
About the authors
Helena Nikolaevna Knyazeva
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Email: helena_knyazeva@mail.ru
Moscow, Russia
References
- Вольлебен 2018 – Вольлебен П. Тайная жизнь деревьев. Что они чувствуют, как они общаются – открытие сокровенного мира. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2018.
- Князева 2018 – Князева Е. Н. Биосемиотика: истоки междисциплинарного направления // Вопросы философии. 2018. № 11. С. 86–98.
- Манкузо 2020 – Манкузо С. О чем думают растения: тайная жизнь, скрытая от посторонних глаз. М.: Эксмо, 2020.
- Уилсон 2022 – Уилсон Э. О. Путешествие к муравьям. М.: Эксмо, 2022.
- Benford 1993 – Benford G. Time and “Timescape” // Science Fiction Studies. 1993. Vol. 20 (2), July. Р. 184–190. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4240248
- Corning 2012 – Corning P. A. The Re-emergence of Emergence, and the Causal Role of Synergy in Emergent Evolution // Synthese. 2012. Vol. 185. P. 295–317.
- De Jesus 2016 – De Jesus P. From enactive phenomenology to biosemiotic enactivism // Adaptive Behavior. 2016. Vol. 24, is. 2. doi: 10.1177/1059712316636437
- Facoetti, Gontier 2021 – Facoetti M., Gontier N. Biosemiotics and Applied Evolutionary Epistemology: A Comparison // Biosemiotics and Evolution. The Natural Foundation of Meanings and Symbolism. Interdisciplinary Evolution Research / E. Pagni, R. T. Simanke (eds.). Cham: Springer Nature, 2021. Vol. 6. P. 175–199. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85265-8_9
- Farina 2008 – Farina A. The Landscape as a Semiotic Interface between Organisms and Resources // Biosemiotics. 2008. Vol. 1. P. 75–83. doi: 10.1007/s12304-008-9006-4
- Farina 2011 – Farina A. Landscape Ecology and the General Theory of Resources: Comparing Two Paradigms // Journal of Landscape Ecology. 2011. Vol. 4 (1). P. 18–29.
- Farina, Belgrano 2004 – Farina A., Belgrano A. The Eco-field: A New Paradigm for Landscape Ecology // Ecological Research. 2004. Vol. 19. P. 107–110.
- Farina, Belgrano 2006 – Farina A., Belgrano A. The Eco-field Hypothesis: Toward a Cognitive Landscape // Landscape Ecology. 2006. Vol. 21. Р. 5–17. doi: 10.1007/s10980-005-7755-x
- Gare 2022 – Gare A. Integrating Biosemiotics and Biohermeneutics in the Quest for Ecological Civilization as a Practical Utopia // Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy. 2022. Vol. 18 (1). P. 22–47.
- Kull 2017 – Kull K. On the logic of animal umwelten. The animal subjective present, or zoosemiotics of choice and learning // Zoosemiotica 2.0: forme e politiche dell’animalità / a cura di Gianfranco Marrone. Palermo: Museo Pasqualino, 2017. P. 143–156.
- Lindström, Kull, Palang 2014 – Lindström K., Kull K., Palang H. Landscape semiotics: Contribution to Culture Theory // Estonian Approaches to Culture Theory. Approaches to Culture Theory / V. Lang, K. Kull (eds.). Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2014. Vol. 4. Р. 110–132.
- Mandik, Clark 2002 – Mandik P., Clark A. Selective Representing and World-Making // Minds and Machines. 2002. Vol. 12. P. 383–395.
- Maran 2019 – Maran T. Deep Ecosemiotics: Forest as a Semiotic Model. // Recherches Sémiotiques. Vol. 38/39 (3/1-2). P. 287–303. doi: 10.7202/1076237ar
- Maran 2020 – Maran T. Ecosemiotics: The Study of Signs in Changing Ecologies. (Elements in Environmental Humanities). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/ecosemiotics/D29658F0C2E12040454C776F82627253
- Maran 2023 – Maran T. Applied Ecosemiotics: Ontological basis and conceptual models // Semiotics and its Masters / A. Olteanu, P. Cobley (eds.). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 2023. Vol. 2. (Semiotics, Communication and Cognition; vol. 36). doi: 10.1515/9783110857801-008
- Maran, Kull 2014 – Maran T., Kull K. Ecosemiotics: main principles and current developments // Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography. 2014. Vol. 96 (1). P. 41–50.
- Nöth 2001 – Nöth W. Ecosemiotics and Semiotics of Nature // Sign Systems Studies. 2001. Vol. 29(1). P. 71–82.
- Stewart 2014 – Stewart J. E. The direction of evolution: The rise of cooperative organization // BioSystems. 2014. Vol. 123. P. 27–36.
- Tian, Wang 2022 – Tian H., Wang Y. Ecosemiotics and Biosemiotics: A Comparative Study // Language Semiotic Studies. 2022. Vol. 8(3). P. 130–144.
- Toutain 2022 – Toutain A.-G. Sign, function and life: Thinking epistemologically about biosemiotics // Sign Systems Studies. 2022. Vol. 50(1). P. 90–132. doi: 10.12697/SSS.2022.50.1.06
- Uexküll 1909 – Uexküll J. von. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Verlag von Julius, 1909.
- Uexküll 1936 – Uexküll J. von. Der Wechsel des Weltalls // Acta Biotheoretica. 1936. Vol 2 (3). P. 141–152.
- Uexküll 1970 – Uexküll J. von. Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Bedeutungslehre. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag, 1970.
- Varela 1997 – Varela F. J. Patterns of Life: Intertwining Identity and Cognition // Brain and Cognition. Vol. 34. P. 72–87.
Supplementary files
