Conceptual Models of Interaction and Interpenetration of Digital Transformation and Sustainable Development in Industrial Enterprise Management
- Authors: Veretyokhin A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
- Issue: No 1(64) (2025)
- Pages: 55-65
- Section: MANAGEMENT
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2306-2800/article/view/303815
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.25686/2306-2800.2025.1.55
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HAXZBG
- ID: 303815
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. Modern company cases clearly demonstrate the focus of industrial enterprise management on digital transformation and ensuring sustainable development, which are usually implemented independently of each other. However, it should be taken into consideration that the combination of these processes at an enterprise often produces a synergistic effect. The aim of the study is to build conceptual models of interaction and interpenetration of digital transformation and sustainable development in the management of digital development of an industrial enterprise. Methods. The study employed the methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization and graphical modeling. The findings of Russian and foreign researchers published in highly rated scientific journals, as well as data from official websites of organizations were used. Results. Based on current views in the field of digital technologies and the ESG approach, the author proposes conceptual models of integration (interpenetration) of digital transformation and sustainable development of an industrial enterprise. The author's interpretation of the notions "responsible digital development of an industrial enterprise" and "sustainable digital development of an industrial enterprise" is presented from the position of directing the organization's sustainable development goals (when focusing on a specific type of responsibility or in the absence of such a preference). The author uses the terms "sustainable ESG development" and "ESG-sustainable digital transformation" to designate the development that meets the ESG principles. It is indicated that the situational prioritization of one or two ESG principles is manifested in the implementation of digital ESG-responsible development and digital ESG-responsible transformation by the enterprise management. Conclusion. The scientific novelty of the results obtained lies in the development of relevant and allowable practical application in corporate management models that take into account the scientific and characteristic concepts of sustainable development and digital transformation of enterprises. The proposed set of terms is complete, since it takes into account all possible combinations of digital transformation and sustainable development of the enterprise. The introduction of the author's conceptual models into the management system of an industrial enterprise will enable organizations to comply with the global focus on digitalization and sustainable development. Orientation towards the proposed models will help managers maintain and strengthen competitive advantages, as well as ensure sustainable growth of their organizations.
About the authors
A. V. Veretyokhin
V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: v_a_v_crimea@mail.ru
Russian Federation, 20, Prospekt Vernadskogo, Simferopol, 295007
References
- Glushakova O. V., Chernikova O. P. Institutionalization of ESG-principles at the international level and in the Russian Federation, their impact on ferrous metallurgy enterprises. Report 1. Izvestiya. Ferrous Metallurgy (Izvestiya vuzov. Chernaya metallurgiya). 2023;66(2):253–264. doi: 10.17073/0368-0797-2023-2-253-264; EDN: YBXQUG. (In Russ.)
- Fura B., Karasek A., Hysa B. Statistical assessment of digital transformation in European Union countries under sustainable development goal 9. Quality & Quantity. 2024;59(1):937–972. doi: 10.1007/s11135-024-01972-0.
- Liu H., Han P., Wang D. et al. Decoding enterprise digital transformation: external oversight and carbon emission reduction performance. Journal of Environmental Management. 2024;359(122):121039. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121039.
- Tian X., Lu H. Digital infrastructure and cross-regional collaborative innovation in enterprises. Finance Research Letters. 2023;58(C):104635. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104635.
- Huang Q., Xu Ch., Xue X. et al. Can digital innovation improve firm performance: evidence from digital patents of Chinese listed firms. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2023;89:102810. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102810.
- Morozova I. A., Smetanina A. I., Smetanin A. S. ESG management of sustainable business development in the context of digital transformation of the Russian economy. Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2023;22(2):425–449. doi: 10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.2.018; EDN: OTTHSK. (In Russ.)
- Babkin A. V., Shkarupeta E. V. Synergy of digital transformation and ESG-development of industrial ecosystems. In: Intelligent Engineering Economics and Industry 5.0 (IEEI_5.0_INPROM). Collection of works of the X International Scientific and Practical Conference. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, April 25–28, 2024. St. Petersburg: POLITEKH-PRESS Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University; 2024:319–324. doi: 10.18720/IEP/2024.1/80; EDN: JDKQSM. (In Russ.)
- Veretyokhin A. V. Organisation management in the digital economy: graduation according to the degree of using digital technologies. Vestnik Universiteta. 2024;(7):5–15. doi: 10.26425/1816-4277-2024-7-5-15; EDN: ANUHCG. (In Russ.)
- Zhang C., Tian X., Sun X. et al. Digital transformation, board diversity, and corporate sustainable development. Sustainability. 2024;16(17):7788. doi: 10.3390/su16177788.
- Our common future: report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 1987. 420 p. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf [Accessed 10 December 2024].
- Dorofeev M. L., Kryukova I. V. Involvement of major Russian corporations with the fulfilment of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals: assessment of current achievements and development opportunities. Eurasian Journal of Economics and Management. 2021;(4):63–76. doi: 10.17308/econ.2021.4/3660; EDN: OHUUGO. (In Russ.)
- Bele A. M., Sabău-Popa C. D., Secară O. M. Sustainable development goals and the triangle of ESG investments. Journal of Financial Studies. 2023;14(8):11–23. doi: 10.55654/JFS.2023.8.14.1.
- Kuznetsova E. V., Teleev D. S. Cybernetic possibilities of accounting and analytical management of business process. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2023;244(6):262–276. doi: 10.38197/2072-2060-2023-244-6-262-276; EDN: GSHWJQ. (In Russ.)
- Elkington J. Enter the triple bottom line. In: Henriques A., Richardson J., eds. The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up? 1st ed. London: Routledge; 2004:23–38.
- Alhajri T. M., Al-Shebli A. Do institutional investors play a meaningful role in the effective implementation of corporate governance on SDG? Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review. 2024;4(2):e02165. doi: 10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n02.pe02165.
Supplementary files
