编辑政策

宗旨及范围

The journal highlights the results of up-to-date innovative research work by the scientific community that comes from advanced areas of research in the interdisciplinary field of acmeology of education and developmental psychology, thus promoting the development of education and science

The journal aims to

  • integrate professional experience and research achievements into the theory and practice of psychology and pedagogy
  • encourage the professional research community to solve the problems of studying and developing the subjects of educational environment, psychological and educational training, socialization and self-determination of a personality;
  • shape an information environment that reflects a dynamic panorama of the professional psychological and pedagogical community

Journal Themes:

  • Educational Acmeology

The section presents the results of theoretical and empirical studies related to elucidating the characteristics of the personal and cognitive development of subjects in the educational environment; conditions and factors for achieving high quality educational systems and the development of subjects in the educational process; optimization factors  of subject - subjective interaction of participants in the educational and vocational training process; achievement factors of a personality (acme) as a subject of development

  • Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to  Investigatios of Psyche Development 

The section presents the results of theoretical and methodological studies related to the substantiation of paradigms, principles and methodological techniques for studying the general psychological person development, as well as the socio-psychological nature of development of a person, group, and society necessary for the complex solution of the problems in the modern education system

  • Psychology of Social Development

The section presents the results of theoretical, empirical and applied research related to the investigation of socio-psychological issues of the development of the individual or group in the developing areas of modern psychology

  • Pedagogy of Development and Cooperation

The section presents the results of theoretical and empirical studies related to the problems of the methodology and theory of pedagogy of development and cooperation, the genesis of the development of its ideas in line with pedagogical anthropology, ethno-pedagogy, a comparative analysis of practical experience and pedagogical forecasting of the problems of pedagogical support of the person in the process of his/her personal and professional development through cooperation of subjects of the educational environment of all types and levels of educational institutions; issues of vocational education, training, retraining and advanced training, including management issues, the organization of the educational process, as well as teacher training complying with the ideas of pedagogy of development and cooperation

  • Chronicle of Scholarly Activities  (Appendices)

The section contains information about specialized conferences and other scientific events launched by Saratov University, specialized external conferences. It contains articles on leading experts in the field of acmeology of education, developmental psychology, and scientific reviews

 

栏目要求

Educational Acmeology

The purpose of this section is to present the results of theoretical and empirical research related to the elucidation of the peculiarity of the personal and cognitive development of subjects of the educational environment, the conditions and factors for achieving a high quality of educational systems and the development of subjects of the educational process; factors of optimization of the subject - the subject interaction of participants in the educational and vocational educational process; factors of achievement of the person (acme) as a subject of development. Objective: the integration of professional experience and research achievements in the field of psychological and pedagogical science and practice. The publication reviews all articles submitted to the editors, which correspond to the topics of the journal section, with the aim of their expert evaluation, on the basis of which the editorial board makes a decision on the possibility of their publication in the journal section. The section is intended for researchers, university lecturers, graduate students and students.

Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Investigations of Psyche's Development

The purpose of this section is to present the results of theoretical and methodological research related to the substantiation of paradigms, principles and methods of studying the general psychological development of a person, as well as the socio-psychological nature of human development, a group, and a society necessary for a comprehensive solution of the problems of the modern education system. Objective: the integration of professional experience and research achievements in the field of psychological science and practice. The publication reviews all articles submitted to the editors, which correspond to the topics of the journal section, with the aim of their expert evaluation, on the basis of which the editorial board makes a decision on the possibility of their publication in the journal section. The section is intended for researchers, university lecturers, graduate students and students.

Psychology of Social Development

The purpose of this section is to present the results of theoretical-empirical and applied research related to the development of social and psychological problems of personality development, a group in a number of developing areas of modern psychology - positive, constructionist, cognitive psychology. Objective: integration of professional experience and research achievements in the field of psychology of social development and practice. The publication reviews all articles submitted to the editors, which correspond to the topics of the journal section, with the aim of their expert evaluation, on the basis of which the editorial board makes a decision on the possibility of their publication in the journal section. The section is intended for researchers, university lecturers, graduate students and students.

Developmental and Cooperational Pedagogics

The purpose of this section is to present the results of theoretical and empirical research related to the problems of the methodology and theory of pedagogy of development and cooperation, the genesis of the development of its ideas in line with the pedagogical anthropology, ethnopedagogy, a comparative analysis of practical experience and pedagogical forecasting of the problems of pedagogical and psychological-pedagogical support of an individual in the process of personal and professional development through cooperation of subjects of the educational environment of all types and levels of educational organizations; issues of vocational education, training, retraining and advanced training, including management issues, organization of the educational process, as well as training of teaching staff in accordance with the ideas of development pedagogy and cooperation. Objective: integration of the experience of practical pedagogy and research achievements in the field of pedagogical science and practice. The publication reviews all articles submitted to the editors, which correspond to the topics of the journal section, with the aim of their expert evaluation, on the basis of which the editorial board makes a decision on the possibility of their publication in the journal section. The section is intended for researchers, university lecturers, graduate students and students.

Appendices

The purpose of this section is to inform about relevant conferences and other scientific events held on the basis of the Saratov University; specialized external conferences; publication of articles about leading scientists in the field of acmeology of education and developmental psychology, scientific reviews. The section is intended for researchers, university professors, graduate students and students.

 

同⾏评审过程

Type: double-blind review

Reviewing is carried out by: members of the editorial board or external experts

Number of reviewers: 2

 

出版周期

Frequency: 4 issues per year

 

开放式获取政策

Статьи этого журнала доступны всем желающим с момента публикации, что обеспечивает свободный открытый доступ к результатам исследований и способствует прогрессу науки.

 

Publication Ethics

Editorial Board of the Journal «Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental  Psychology» adheres to the Publication Ethics of the Journal «Izvestiya of Saratov University».

 

Publication  Ethics of Journal «Izvestiya of Saratov University»

Adopted at the University Academic Council sitting

 July, 1, 2014

Minutes № 8.

Approved by the Rector  of SSU

July, 14, 2014

Editorial Board of the Journal «Izvestiya of Saratov University» commits to maintaining good scientific reputation. Our journals publish scholarly works and we bear responsibility for keeping high standards of the publications. Editorial Board strives to uphold ethical norms accepted by the international research community and prevent any violation of such norms.

The present document is compiled in accord with the Committee of Publication Ethics[1] recommendations. It also considers the experience of the leading international Publishing Houses[2] and Journal Editorial Boards.

 

1. Duties of Editor in Chief and Editorial Board Members

1.1. Publication decision

Editor in Chief (Editor) of the journal is solely and independently responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always underwrite such decisions. The Editor is guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may consult other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

1.2. Unbiasedness

Editorial Board members should carry out proper assessment of the manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

1.3. Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

 

1.4. Disclosure policy and conflicts of interest

1.4.1 Unpublished materials of a submitted manuscript must not be used in the editor's own research without the author’s express written consent. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
1.4.2 Editorial Board members should recuse themselves from considering the manuscripts (i.e. ask the Editor, Deputy Editor or other members of the editorial board to review and consider the materials instead) in  case of the conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions related to the papers.

1.5. Vigilance over published record

The Editorial Board member presenting convincing evidence of the invalidity of the paper research assumptions or conclusions should report about it to the Editor (and/or Editorial Board) with the purpose of prompt notification about the necessity of correction, paper retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant.

1.6. Involvement and cooperation in investigations

Editorial Board must take appropriate responsive measures in case of ethical complaints concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper. Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies.

 

2. Duties of Reviewers

2.1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists in making editorial decisions and through communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication, and lies at the heart of the scientific method. Editorial Board shares the view that all scholars who wish to contribute to publications have an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.

2.2. Promptness

Selected reviewers who feel they do not have the expertise to assess all aspects of the manuscript or if circumstances arise that will prevent them from submitting a timely review should notify the editor and recuse themselves from the review process.

2.3. Confidentiality

Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. It must not be shown to or discussed with any other person except as authorised by the editor.

2.4. Standard and objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

2.5. Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should be alert to failure of authors to cite relevant published work of other scholars. Any previously reported statement in an observation, derivation, or argument should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

2.6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

2.6.1 Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer's own research without the express of written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

2.6.2. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts if there is a conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions related to the papers.

 

3. Duties of Authors

3.1. Reporting standards

Authors of scientific articles describing the original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective assessment of its significance. Underlying data should be accurately represented in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references for possible replication. Fraudulent or wittingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

3.2. Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data related to the paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide free access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

3.3. Originality and Plagiarism

3.3.1 The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if they have used the works and/or assertions of other authors, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

3.3.2 Plagiarism takes many forms, from presenting other scholar’s work as the author's own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of other scholars ' papers (without references), to claiming results of research conducted by other authors. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

3.4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

3.4.1 An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal of primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

3.4.2. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.

3.4.3. Publication of some kinds of articles (e.g., clinical guidelines, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication. Further detail on acceptable forms of secondary publication can be found at www.icmje.org.

3.5. Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of other scholars must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

3.6. Authorship of the Paper

3.6.1 Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

3.6.2. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

3.7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

3.7.1 If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

3.7.2 If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) have approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

3.8. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

3.8.1 All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed as influencing the results or interpretation of their manuscript.

3.8.2 Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest possible stage.

3.9. Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in a published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published paper contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper.

 

4. Duties of the Publisher

4.1 The publisher should adopt policies and procedures that support editors, reviewers and authors in performing their ethical duties under these ethics guidelines. The publisher should ensure that the potential revenue for advertising or reprint has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

4.2. The publisher should support journal editors in the review of complaints raised concerning ethical issues and help communications with other journals and/or publishers where this contributes to performing the duties of Editorial Boards.

4.3. The publisher should develop codes of practice and inculcate industry standards for best practice on ethical matters, errors and retractions.

4.4 The publisher should provide specialised legal review and counsel if necessary.

 

OECD RUBRICS

501. Psychology

503. Educational sciences

 

VAK SPECIALTIES

It has been included in the List of Higher Attestation Commission since 2015 (Letter on the List of peer-reviewed scientific publications dated December 1, 2015 No. 13-6518, List of Higher Attestation Commission as amended on December 1, 2015). Category K2. http://vak.minobrnauki.gov.ru/documents#tab=_tab:editions~

Compliance of the journal topics with the Nomenclature of scientific specialties:

Compliance of the journal topics with the Nomenclature of scientific specialties:

From 01.02.2022

  • 5.3.1. General psychology, personality psychology, history of psychology (Psychological sciences);
  • 5.3.4. Pedagogical psychology, psychodiagnostics of digital educational environments (Psychological sciences);
  • 5.8.1. General pedagogy, the history of pedagogy and education (Pedagogical sciences);
  • 5.8.7. Methodology and technology of vocational education (Pedagogical sciences).

 

From 28.12.2018 to 16.10.2022

  • 13.00.01 - General pedagogy, the history of pedagogy and education
  • 13.00.08 - Theory and methodology of vocational education
  • 19.00.01 - General psychology, personality psychology, history of psychology
  • 19.00.05 - Social Psychology
  • 19.00.07 - Educational Psychology
  • 19.00.13 - Development Psychology, Acmeology

##common.cookie##