Modern approaches to the treatment and long-term management of arterial hypertension in clinical practice. Pharmacological and clinical characteristics of angiotensin II receptor blockers: focus on azilsartan medoxomil. Part I

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

This article deals withthe overview of the pharmacological characteristics of one class of antihypertensive drugs - angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARA II) and new member of this class - azilsartan medoxomil (Edarbi®).We have analyzed the antihypertensive efficacy of different ARA, as well as azilsartan medoxomil efficacyin case of monotherapy and in comparison with other ARA and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsamong different groups of patients.The article describes the pleiotropic effects of azilsartan medoxomil, discovered nowadays.

作者简介

M. Bubnova

State Research Center for Preventive Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: mbubnova@gnicpm.ru
д-р мед. наук, проф., рук. отд. реабилитации и вторичной профилактики сочетанной патологии с лаб. профилактики атеросклероза и тромбоза ФГБУ ГНИЦ ПМ 101990, Russian Federation, Moscow, Petroverigsky per., d. 10, str. 3

参考

  1. Lawes C.M, Hoorn S.V, Rodgers A. Global burden of blood - pressure - related disease, 2001. Lancet 2008; 371 (Issue 9623): 1513-8.
  2. Falaschetti E, Chaudhury M, Mindell J et al. Continued Improvement in Hypertension Management in England: Results From the Health Survey for England 2006. Hypertension 2009; 53: 480-6.
  3. Levy D, Larson M.G, Vasan R.S et al. The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. JAMA 1996; 275: 1557-62.
  4. Воробьева О.Д., Денисенко М.Б., Елизаров В.В. и др. Демографический ежегодник России. Стат. сб. Росстат. M., 2013. http://www.gks.ru
  5. Бойцов С.А., Баланова Ю.А., Шальнова С.А. и др. от имени участников исследования ЭССЕ-РФ. Артериальная гипертония среди лиц 25-64 лет: распространенность, осведомленность, лечение и контроль. По материалам исследования ЭССЕ. Кардиоваск. терапия и профилактика. 2014; 14 (4): 4-14.
  6. Оганов Р.Г., Тимофеева Т.Н., Колтунов И.Е. и др. Эпидемиология артериальной гипертонии в России. Результаты федерального мониторинга 2003-2010 гг. Кардиоваск. терапия и профилактика. 2011; 10 (1): 9-13.
  7. Grujic V, Dragnic N, Kvrgic S. Epidemiology of Hypertension in Serbia: Results of a National Survey. J Epidemiol 2012; 22 (3): 261-6.
  8. Dorobantu M, Darabont R.O, Badila E et al. Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in Romania: Results of the SEPHAR Study. Int. J Hypertens 2010; Article ID 970694, 6 pages, doi: 10,4061/2010/970694
  9. Meng X.J, Dong G.H, Wang D et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control, and risk factors associated with hypertension in urban adults from 33 communities of China: the CHPSNE study. J Hypertens 2011; 29 (Issue 7): 1303-10.
  10. Joffres M, Falaschetti E, Gillespie C. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in national surveys from England, the USA and Canada, and correlation with stroke and ischaemic heart disease mortality: a cross - sectional study. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e003423. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003423
  11. Gu Q, Burt V.L, Dillon C.F, Yoon S. Trends in Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control Among United States adults With Hypertension: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001 to 2010. Circulation 2012; 126: 2105-14.
  12. Campbell N, Young E.R, Drouin D et al. A Framework for Discussion on How to Improve Prevention, Management, and Control of Hypertension in Canada. Canadian J Cardiology 2014; 28 (Issue 3): 262-9.
  13. Mancia G, Ambrosioni E, Rosei E.A et al. Blood pressure control and risk of stroke in untreated and treated hypertensive patients screened from clinical practice: results of the ForLife study. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 1575-81.
  14. Ezzati M, Oza S, Danaei G, Murray C.J. Trends and cardiovascular mortality effects of state - level blood pressure and uncontrolled hypertension in the United States. Circulation 2008; 117: 905-14.
  15. Chow С.K, Teo K.K, Rangarajan S et al. Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in Rural and Urban Communities in High -, Middle -, and Low - Income Countries. JAMA 2013; 310 (9): 959-68.
  16. Tocci G, Rosei E.A, Ambrosioni E et al. Blood pressure control in Italy: analysis of clinical data from 2005-2011 surveys on hypertension. J Hypertens 2012; 30 (6): 1065-74.
  17. Schafer H.H, Sudano I, Theus G.R et al. Target blood pressure attainment with antihypertensive therapy in Swiss primary care. Blood Pressure 2012; 21 (4): 211-9.
  18. Chobanian A.V, Bakris G.L, Black H.R et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003; 42: 1206-52.
  19. James P.A, Oparil S, Carter B.L et al. 2014. Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adulds. Report from the Panel Members Appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427. Published online Dec 18, 2013.
  20. Леонова М.В., Белоусов Д.Ю., Штейнберг Л.Л. и др. Первые результаты фармакоэпидемиологического исследования артериальной гипертонии ПИФАГОР III. Качественная клин. практика. 2010; 1: 54-60.
  21. Weber M.A, Schiffrin E.L, White W.B et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2014; 32: 3-15.
  22. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2159-219.
  23. Диагностика и лечение артериальной гипертонии. Клинические рекомендации. 2013.
  24. Carey R.M, Wang Z.Q, Sigary H.M. Role of the angiotensin type 2 receptor in the regulation of blood pressure and renal function. Hypertension 2000; 35: 155-63.
  25. Israilli Z.H. Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension. J Hum Hypertension 2000; 14 (Suppl. 1): S73-S86.
  26. Леонова М.В. Клиническая фармакология антагонистов рецепторов ангиотензина II. Фарматека. 2003; 12: 42-7.
  27. Mire D.E, Silfani T.N, Pugsley M.K. A Review of the structural and functional features of olmesartan medoxomil, an angiotensin receptor blocker. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2005; 46: 585-93.
  28. Cernes R, Mashavi M, Zimlichman R. Differential clinical profile of candesartan compared to other angiotensin receptor blockers. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2011; 7: 749-59.
  29. Makani H, Bangalore S, Supariwala A et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta - analysis. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 1732-42.
  30. Xi G.L, Cheng J.W, Lu G.C. Meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing telmisartan with losartan in the treatment of patients with hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2008; 21: 546-52.
  31. Smith D.H, Cramer M.J, Neutel J.M et al. Comparison of telmisartan versus losartan: meta - analysis of titration - to - response studies. Blood Press Monit 2003; 8: 111-7.
  32. Mazzolai L, Maillard M, Rossat J et al. Angiotensin II receptor blockade in normotensive subjects: a direct comparison of three AT1 receptor antagonists. Hypertension 1999; 33: 850-5.
  33. Turnbull F, Neal B, Ninomiya T et al. Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta - analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2008; 336: 1121-3.
  34. Ojima M, Igata H, Tanaka M et al. In vitro antagonistic properties of a new angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan, in receptor binding and function studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011; 336: 801-8.
  35. Miura S, Fujino M, Hanzawa H et al. Molecular mechanism underlying inverse agonist of angiotensin II type 1 receptor. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 19288-95.
  36. Zaiken K, Cheng J.W. Azilsartan medoxomil: a new Angiotensin receptor blocker. Clin Ther 2011; 33 (11): 1577-89.
  37. Bakris G.L, Sica D, Weber M et al. The comparative effects of azilsartan medoxomil and olmesartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011; 13 (2): 81-8.
  38. Sica D, White W, Weber M et al. Comparison of the Novel Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil vs Valsartan by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011; 13: 467-72.
  39. White W.B, Weber M.A, Sica D et al. Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. Hypertension 2011; 57: 413-20.
  40. Rakugi H, Enya K, Sugiura K, Ikeda Y. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension: a randomized, double - blind clinical study. Hypertens Res 2012; 35: 552-8.
  41. Bonner G, Bakris G, Sica D et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil compared with the angiotensin - converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril. J Hum Hypertens 2013; 27: 479-86.
  42. Gitt А.К, Baumgart Р, Mahfoud F et al., for the EARLY Registry Group EARLY Treatment with azilsartan compared to ACE-inhibitors in antihypertensive therapy - rationale and design of the EARLY hypertension registry. BMC Cardiovasc Dis 2013; 13 (46): 2-8.
  43. Potthoff S, Gitt A, Braumgart P et al. Blood pressure reduction by monotherapy with azilsartan as compared to ace inhibitors in clinical practice in GERMANY. Results of the EARLY REGISTRY. J Hypertens 2014; 32: e370-1.
  44. White W.B, Weber M.A, Sica D et al. The effects of azilsartan medoxomil compared with olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in diabetic and prediabetic patients. Presented at: 22nd Scientific Meeting of the European Society of Hypertension. April 26-29, 2012. London, United Kingdom. Poster.
  45. Volpe M, Savoia C. New treatment options in the management of hypertension: appraising the potential role of azilsartan medoxomil. Integr Blood Press Control 2012; 5: 19-25.
  46. Prasad A, Quyyumi A.A. Renin - angiotensin system and angiotensin receptor blockers in the metabolic syndrome. Circulation 2004; 110: 1507-12.
  47. Negro R, Formoso G, Hassan H. The effects of irbesartan and telmisartan on metabolic parameters and blood pressure in obese, insulin resistant, hypertensive patients. J Endocrinol Invest 2006; 29: 957-61.
  48. Nishimura H, Sanaka T, Tanihata Y et al. Losartan elevates the serum high - molecular weight - adiponectin isoform and concurrently improves insulin sensitivity in patients with impaired glucose metabolism. Hypertens Res 2008; 31: 1611-18.
  49. Higashiura K, Ura N, Takada T et al. The effects of an angiotensin - converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor antagonist on insulin resistance in fructose - fed rats. Am J Hypertens 2000; 13 (3): 290-7.
  50. Koike H, Sada T, Mizuno M. In vitro and in vivo pharmacology of Olmesartan medoxomil, an angiotensin II type AT1 receptor antagonist. J Hypertens 2001; 19 (S1): S3-S14.
  51. Koh K.K, Quon M.J, Chung W.J, Shin E.K. Anti - inflammatory and metabolic effects of candesartan in hypertensive patients. Int J Cardiol 2006; 108 (1): 96-100.
  52. Yusuf S, Ostergren J.B, Gerstein H.C et al. Effects of candesartan on the development of a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure. Circulation 2005; 112 (1): 48-53.
  53. Julius S, Kjeldsen S.E, Weber M et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 2022-31.
  54. Kusumoto K, Igata H, Ojima M et al. Antihypertensive, insulin - sensitising and renoprotective effects of a novel, potent and long - acting angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan medoxomil, in rat and dog models. Eur J Pharmacol 2011; 669: 84-93.
  55. Zhao M, Li Y, Wang J et al. Azilsartan treatment improves insulin sensitivity in obese spontaneously hypertensive Koletsky rats. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011; 13 (12): 1123-9.
  56. Iwai M, Chen R, Imura Y, Horiuchi M. TAK0536, new AT1 receptor blocker, improves glucose intolerance and adipocyte differentiation. Am J Hypertens 2007; 20 (5): 579-86.
  57. Kajiya T, Ho C, Wang J et al. Molecular and cellular effects of azilsartan: a new generation angiotensin II receptor blocker. J Hypertens 2011; 29: 2476-83.
  58. French C, Tarikuz Zaman A.K.M, Sobel B.E. The angiotensin receptor blocker, azilsartan medoxomil (TAK-491), suppresses vascular wall expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-I protein potentially facilitating the stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2011; 58: 143-8.
  59. Ye Y, Keyes K.T, Zhang C.F et al. Additive effect of TAK-491, a new angiotensin receptor blocker, and pioglitazone, in reducing myocardial in - farct size. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2010; 24: 107-20.
  60. Kajiya T, Ho C, Wang J et al. Molecular and cellular effects of azilsartan: a new generation angiotensin II recеptor blocker. J Hypertens 2011; 29: 2476-83.
  61. Antunes de Araujo A., Varela H., Xavier de Medeiros C. АC et al. Azilsartan Reduced TNF-a and IL-1b Levels, Increased IL-10 Levels and Upregulated VEGF, FGF, KGF, and TGF-a in an Oral Mucositis Model PLoS One. 2015; 10(2): e0116799. Published online 2015, Feb 17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116799 PMCID: PMC4331549

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2015

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用-相同方式共享 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##