Midterm outcomes of the Ozaki procedure in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve: retrospective single-center, non-randomized, parallel-group study

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An alternative to plastic surgery on the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be replacement of the leaflets with autopericardium using the Ozaki technique. The procedure is characterized by excellent hemodynamic results in the short and long term in patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). However, the question remains about the long-term results of the procedure and the frequency of reoperations in patients with BAV.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the midterm outcomes of the Ozaki procedure in patients with BAV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective single-center, non-randomized, parallel-group study was conducted. Since January 2015 to October 1, 2023, the clinic performed 809 Ozaki procedures. The work included 540 patients with studied midterm and long-term outcomes for up to 5 years. Both isolated aortic valve replacement and combined operations with coronary artery bypass grafting and (or) correction of mitral and tricuspid valve defects were performed.

RESULTS: Midterm mortality was 5.7% (n=3) in the group with BAV and 7.3% (n=36) in the group with TAV. Reoperation for aortic regurgitation was required in 16 patients (2.9%): 1 patient (1.9%) in BAV group and 15 (3.3%) in TAV group. Freedom from reoperations in patients with BAV after the Ozaki procedure for up to 5 years was 95.4%, in the group with TAV — 92.6%. The peak gradient on the aortic valve in the group with BAV was 16±7.3, in TAV group — 16.4±10.9. 5 years after surgery, the mean gradient on the aortic valve does not exceed 10 mm Hg.

CONCLUSION: The Ozaki operation in patients with BAV is an effective and safe procedure in the midterm follow-up period.

About the authors

Vladlen V. Bazylev

Federal Center of Cardiovascular Surgery

Email: cardio-penza@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6089-9722
SPIN-code: 3153-8026

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, cardiovascular surgeon, chief physician

Russian Federation, Penza

Andrey B. Voevodin

Federal Center of Cardiovascular Surgery

Email: voevodin.ab@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7078-1274
SPIN-code: 7869-9962

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), cardiovascular surgeon, department head

Russian Federation, Penza

Vadim A. Karnakhin

Federal Center of Cardiovascular Surgery

Email: vkhin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1815-7116
SPIN-code: 5680-7893

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), cardiovascular surgeon

Russian Federation, Penza

Ivan D. Potopalskiy

Federal Center of Cardiovascular Surgery

Author for correspondence.
Email: potopalskiy.i@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6412-7893
SPIN-code: 8457-4672

cardiovascular surgeon

Russian Federation, Penza

References

  1. de Kerchove L, Mastrobuoni S, Froede L, et al. Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019:ezz033. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz033. Epub ahead of print.
  2. Kawase I, Ozaki S, Yamashita H, et al. Aortic valve reconstruction of unicuspid aortic valve by tricuspidization using autologous pericardium. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(4):1180–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.016
  3. Chernov II, Enginoev ST, Komarov RN, et al. Short-term outcomes of Ozaki procedure: a multicenter study. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(4S):4157. (In Russ). doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4157
  4. Ozaki S, Kawase I, Yamashita H, et al. Reconstruction of bicuspid aortic valve with autologous pericardium — usefulness of tricuspidization. Circ J. 2014;78(5):1144–1151. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-1335
  5. Sievers HH, Schmidtke C. A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(5):1226–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.039
  6. Fernández B, Soto-Navarrete MT, López-García A, et al. Bicuspid Aortic Valve in 2 Model Species and Review of the Literature. Vet Pathol. 2020;57(2):321–331. doi: 10.1177/0300985819900018
  7. Verma R, Cohen G, Colbert J, Fedak PWM. Bicuspid aortic valve associated aortopathy: 2022 guideline update. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2023;38(2):61–67. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001020
  8. Jamieson WR, Miyagishima RT, Munro AI, et al. The Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to 8 years of a new generation porcine bioprosthesis. J Card Surg. 1991;6(4 Suppl):562–567. doi: 10.1111/jocs.1991.6.4s.562
  9. Badiu CC, Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, et al. Are bicuspid aortic valves a limitation for aortic valve repair? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(5):1097–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.008
  10. Baird CW, Marathe SP, Del Nido PJ. Aortic valve neo-cuspidation using the Ozaki technique for acquired and congenital disease: where does this procedure currently stand? Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;36(Suppl 1):113–122. doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00917-9
  11. Krane M, Amabile A, Ziegelmüller JA, et al. Aortic valve neocuspidization (the Ozaki procedure). Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;2021. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2021.060
  12. Schneider U, Hofmann C, Schöpe J, et al. Long-term results of differentiated anatomic reconstruction of bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(12):1366–1373. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3749
  13. Ozaki S. Ozaki Procedure: 1,100 patients with up to 12 years of follow-up. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2019;27(4):454. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2019.01904
  14. Chan J, Basu A, Di Scenza G, et al. Understanding aortic valve repair through Ozaki procedure: A review of literature evidence. J Card Surg. 2022;37(12):5202–5206. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16846
  15. Prinzing A, Böhm J, Sideris K, et al. AVNeo improves early haemodynamics in regurgitant bicuspid aortic valves compared to aortic valve repair. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35(5):ivac226. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac226

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Cumulative mortality function after the Ozaki procedure by group(82,6±4,1% — ДАК, 78,4±1,3% — ТАК, Cox-Mantel — 0,1).). Note (here and Fig. 2–4). ДАК — bicuspid aortic valve, ТАК — tricuspid aortic valve.

Download (68KB)
3. Fig. 2. Cumulative distribution function of freedom from reoperation after the Ozaki procedure by group (95,4±1,3% — ДАК, 92,6±0,9% — ТАК, Cox-Mantel — 0,6).

Download (61KB)
4. Fig. 3. Peak pressure gradient across the aortic valve after the Ozaki procedure by group before surgery and in the mid-term period.

Download (84KB)
5. Fig. 4. Middle pressure gradient across the aortic valve after the Ozaki procedure by group before surgery and in the mid-term period.

Download (78KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).