Correlation Between Melodic Patterns and Kinesic Means in Multimodal Discourse

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

At present, the issues of interaction of several discourse modalities in communication are becoming more relevant for linguistic research. In the article, based on a documentary cross-cultural interview, the interrelation of melodic patterns and kinesic means in the speech of Englishmen and Americans is investigated for the first time. At the intonation level, the change of pitch is studied in the pre-terminal part of the sense-group. In Received Pronunciation, stepping and sliding heads are scrutinised while in General American mid-level and mid-wavy level heads are under consideration. At the kinesic level, the focus is on accentuating gestures of the hand, head, and body, as well as eyebrow movement. The results of auditory, visual, and comprehensive comparative types of analysis allowed for singling out a number of melodic-kinesic patterns — combinations of intonation and gestural modalities, serving as important accentuating means. The acquired data, on the one hand, serves to deepen the existing ideas about the interaction of intonation and kinesics in documentary interview. On the other hand, due to the comparative analysis of the respondents’ speech, a more complete picture of cross-cultural interaction between representatives of English and American cultures is obtained.

About the authors

I. D. Gendelev

Moscow State Linguistic University; MISIS University

Author for correspondence.
Email: elijah011@mail.ru
Postgraduate student at the Department of English Phonetics; assistant teacher at the Department of Foreign Languages and Communication Technologies Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Akhmanova O.S. Dictionary of linguistic terms, Moscow, 1966, 606 p. — In Russ.
  2. Iriskhanova O.K. Multimodal Dimensions of Discourse., ed. by. O.K. Iriskhanova, Moscow, 2022, 488 p. — In Russ.
  3. Kibrik A.A. Multimodal linguistics, Cognitive Studies: a collection of articles, ed. by Iu.I. Aleksandrova, V.D. Solov'ev, Mocow, 2010, iss. 4, pp. 135—152. — In Russ.
  4. Kreidlin G.E. Kinesics, Grigor'eva S.A., Grigor'ev N.V., Kreidlin G.E. Dictionary of Russian Gestures, Moscow, 2001, pp. 166—254. — In Russ.
  5. Potapova R.K., Potapov V.V., Komalova L.R. Perception of Multimodal Mono- and Poly-Ethnic Communication: Monograph., ed. by L.R. Komalova, Moscow, 2020, 210 p. — In Russ.
  6. Sukhova N.V. Interaction Between Prosody and Nonverbal Means in Monologue Speech (on the English Documentaries): diss. … Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Moscow, 2004, 166 p. — In Russ.
  7. Tsibulya N.B. Fields of nonverbal studies: monograph, Moscow, 2020, 426 p. — In Russ.
  8. Knapp M. Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1972, 213 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).