断标准用于优化治疗脾脏创伤性撕裂儿童的策略
- 作者: Pikalo I.A.1, Podkamenev V.V.1, Karabinskaya O.A.1, Novozhilov V.A.1, Milyukova L.P.1
-
隶属关系:
- Irkutsk State Medical University
- 期: 卷 14, 编号 3 (2024)
- 页面: 347-358
- 栏目: Original Study Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2219-4061/article/view/268212
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic1812
- ID: 268212
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
现实性。在儿童腹部创伤中,脾脏损伤占据主要地位。这常常成为进行脾切除术的主要指征。大多数研究者发现,脾切除的后果是完全失去该器官的免疫和血液功能。因此,保护脾脏是预防脾切除后低脾功能及其相关危及生命并发症的首要措施。
目的。构建逻辑回归模型,以识别与儿童脾脏创伤手术治疗相关的变量,并确定绝对安全的休克指数参数,用于保守治疗。
材料和方法。进行了前瞻性队列研究,分析了91名脾脏创伤患者的数据。其中,80名儿童(占87.9%)接受了保守治疗,11名儿童(占12.1%)接受了手术治疗。受伤儿童的年龄中位数为11岁(范围8至13岁), 男孩的比例是女孩的3.3倍(70名对21名)。为了评估接受手术治疗的可能性,使用逻辑回归方法对分类变量进行了分析。
结果。研究发现,高休克指数(β = –0.264±0.083;t(86) = –3.191;p = 0.002)和需要输血(β = 0.464±0.089;t(86) = 5.218;p = 0.001)是与儿童脾脏撕裂手术治疗高度相关的综合因素。结合这两个参数时,手术治疗的敏感性为85.7%(95% CI 52.1–99.6;p = 0.001),阳性预测值为75%(95% CI 34.9–96.8)。若无上述因素,儿童脾脏撕裂的保守治疗概率接近100%(特异性97.5%;95% CI 91.1–99.7;p = 0.001)。综合分析发现,曲线下面积为0.941±0.026(95% CI 0.872–0.980),模型适合性评估显示结果良好(χ² = 32.7;p = 0.264)。在非手术治疗中,发现的综合因素频率为2.5%(n = 2)。确定了成功保守治疗儿童脾脏撕裂的绝对安全休克指数参数:对于6岁以下儿童,休克指数应小于1.1;对于7至12岁儿童,休克指数应小于0.85;对于13岁以上儿童,休克指数应小于0.83。
结论。研究表明,高休克指数和需要输血是决定儿童脾脏创伤手术治疗高概率的综合因素。在非手术治疗中,发现的综合因素频率为2.5%,这为保守治疗的安全性提供了有力的支持。
作者简介
Ilia Pikalo
Irkutsk State Medical University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: pikalodoc@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2494-2735
SPIN 代码: 4885-4209
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya st., 664003, IrkutskVladimir Podkamenev
Irkutsk State Medical University
Email: vpodkamenev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0885-0563
SPIN 代码: 7722-5010
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya st., 664003, IrkutskOlga Karabinskaya
Irkutsk State Medical University
Email: fastmail164@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0080-1292
SPIN 代码: 1511-3402
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya st., 664003, IrkutskVladimir Novozhilov
Irkutsk State Medical University
Email: novozilov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9309-6691
SPIN 代码: 5633-5491
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya st., 664003, IrkutskLalita Milyukova
Irkutsk State Medical University
Email: imdkb@imdkb.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4481-6824
SPIN 代码: 6901-2748
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya st., 664003, Irkutsk参考
- Babich II, Pshenichny AA, Avanesov MS, et al. Peculiarities of treatment of craniocerebral injury for combined damage to parenchymal organs in children. Modern Science: actual problems of theory and practice. A series Natural and Technical Sciences. 2021;(5–2):103–107. doi: 10.37882/2223-2966.2021.05-2.04
- Notrica DM, Sussman BL, Sayrs LW, et al. Early vasopressor administration in pediatric blunt liver and spleen injury: An ATOMAC+ study. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;56(3):500–505. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.07.007
- Fletcher KL, Meagher M, Spencer BL, et al. Routine repeat imaging of pediatric blunt solid organ injuries is not necessary. Am Surg. 2023;89(4):691–698. doi: 10.1177/00031348211038587
- Rumyantseva GN, Kazakov AN, Volkov SI, et al. More on the modern approach to diagnostics and treatment of spleen trauma in children. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal of Emergency Medical Care. 2021;10(1):168–173. EDN: FPSVDA doi: 10.23934/2223-9022-2021-10-1-168-173
- Conradie B, Kong V, Cheung C, et al. Retrospective cohort study of paediatric splenic injuries at a major adult trauma centre in South Africa identifies areas of success and improvement. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(6):1091–1097. doi: 10.1111/ans.16748.
- Rozenfel›d II, Chilikina DL, Varpetyan AM, Kakhlerova TA. Current views on the diagnosis and treatment of spleen injuries in children. Russian medicine. 2021;27(5):501–516. EDN: IVZOGN doi: 10.17816/0869-2106-2021-27-5-501-516
- Gorelik AL, Karaseva OV, Timofeeva AV, et al. Medical and epidemiological aspects of splenic injury in children in a metropolis. Pediatric surgery. 2022;26(3):142–149. EDN: SNURKE doi: 10.55308/1560-9510-2022-26-3-142-149
- Adams SE, Holland A, Brown J. A comparison of the management of blunt splenic injury in children and young people — A New South Wales, population-based, retrospective study. Injury. 2018;49(1):42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.023
- Chong J, Jones P, Spelman D, et al. Overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis in patients with asplenia and hyposplenia: a retrospective cohort study. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145(2):397–400. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002405
- Madenci A.L., Armstrong L.B., Kwon N.K., et al. Incidence and risk factors for sepsis after childhood splenectomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(7):1445–1448. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.024
- Siu M, Levin D, Christiansen R, et al. Prophylactic splenectomy and hyposplenism in spaceflight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2022;93(12):877–881. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.6079.2022
- Acker SN, Ross JT, Partrick DA, et al. Pediatric specific shock index accurately identifies severely injured children. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(2):331–334. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.08.009.
- Knight M., Kuo Y-H., Ahmed N. Risk factors associated with splenectomy following a blunt splenic injury in pediatric patients. Pediatr Surg Int. 2020;36(12):1459–1464. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04750-9
- Teuben M, Spijkerman R, Teuber H, et al. Splenic injury severity, not admission hemodynamics, predicts need for surgery in pediatric blunt splenic trauma. Patient Saf Surg. 2020;14:1. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0218-0
- Grootenhaar M, Lamers D, Ulzen KK, et al. The management and outcome of paediatric splenic injuries in the Netherlands. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00353-4
- Shinn K., Gilyard S., Chahine A., et al. Contemporary management of pediatric blunt splenic trauma: a national trauma databank analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;32(5):692–702. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.11.024
- Chaudhari PP, Rodean J, Spurrier RG, et al. Epidemiology and management of abdominal injuries in children. Acad Emerg Med. 2022;29(8):944–953. doi: 10.1111/acem.14497
- Notrica DM, Eubanks 3rd JW, Tuggle DW, et al. Nonoperative management of blunt liver and spleen injury in children: Evaluation of the ATOMAC guideline using GRADE. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(4):683–693. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000808
- Phillips R, Meier M, Shahi N, et al. Elevated pediatric age-adjusted shock-index (SIPA) in blunt solid organ injuries. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;56(2):401–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.10.022
- Shahi N, Shahi AK, Phillips R, et al. Decision-making in pediatric blunt solid organ injury: A deep learning approach to predict massive transfusion, need for operative management, and mortality risk. J Pediatr Surg. 2021;56(2):379–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.10.021
- Stevens J, Phillips R, Meier M, et al. Novel tool (BIS) heralds the need for blood transfusion and/or failure of non-operative management in pediatric blunt liver and spleen injuries. J Pediatr Surg. 2022;57(9):202–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.09.043
- Reppucci ML, Stevens J, Cooper E, et al. Discreet values of shock index pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) to predict intervention in children with blunt organ injuries. J Surg Res. 2022;279:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.006
补充文件




