Robot-assisted intravesical ureteral reimplantation in a 13-year-old adolescent: A case report

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of intravesical ureteral reimplantation in children have been demonstrated in an extensive clinical data, widely reported in the literature over the past two decades. However, its widespread adoption remains limited due to significant technological challenges, primarily the need to operate within an extremely confined space inside the bladder and the non-ergonomic positioning required for the surgeon. Robotic-assisted surgery may help overcome these limitations by improving both the learning curve and surgical ergonomics. This article presents our first experience with robot-assisted intravesical ureteral reimplantation using the da Vinci Xi system in a 13-year-old girl with vesicoureteral reflux and recurrent urinary tract infections. A Cohen ureteroneocystostomy was successfully completed without conversion and with no intraoperative complications. The total operative time was 160 minutes, with 85 of console time. Estimated blood loss was 10 mL. In the postoperative period, a single complication was observed—a urinary tract infection, which was successfully managed conservatively. Our experience demonstrates that robot-assisted intravesical ureteral reimplantation is a feasible and minimally invasive alternative to both laparoscopic and conventional intravesical ureteroneocystostomy, providing a higher level of surgical comfort. However, further studies are needed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of intravesical da Vinci Xi surgery in younger pediatric patients.

About the authors

Vladimir V. Sizonov

Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vsizonov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9145-8671
SPIN-code: 2155-5534

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-Don

Alexey G. Makarov

Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov State Medical University

Email: lexxrgmu@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9311-3706
SPIN-code: 6017-3765

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-Don

Aleksandr V. Pirogov

Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital, Rostov-on-Don

Email: alekspirogow@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8031-2597
SPIN-code: 6854-5479

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Sergei M. Pakus

Clinical and Diagnostic Center “Zdorovie”

Email: sergejj.pakus@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6468-5983
SPIN-code: 2225-6695

Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Mikhail I. Kogan

Rostov State Medical University

Email: dept_kogan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1710-0169
SPIN-code: 6300-3241

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

References

  1. Sargent MA. What is the normal prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux? Pediatr Radiol. 2000;30:587–593. doi: 10.1007/s002470000263
  2. Gimpel C, Masioniene L, Djakovic N, et al. Complications and long-term outcome of primary obstructive megaureter in childhood. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25(9):1679–1686. doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1523-0 EDN: FWWSRE
  3. Doery AJ, Ang E, Ditchfield MR. Duplex kidney: not just a drooping lily. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015;59(2):149–153. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12285
  4. Heidenreich A, Ozgur E, Becker T, Haupt G. Surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in pediatric patients. World J Urol. 2004;22(2):96–106. doi: 10.1007/s00345-004-0408-x
  5. Valla JS, Steyaert H, Griffin SJ, et al. Transvesicoscopic Cohen ureteric reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux in children: a single-centre 5-year experience. J Pediatr Urol. 2009;5(6):466–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.03.012
  6. Bondarenko S. Laparoscopic extravesical transverse ureteral reimplantation in children with obstructive megaureter. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(4):437–441. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.01.001 EDN: RFIIYR
  7. Jayanthi VR. Vesicoscopic cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation: High success rate for elimination of primary reflux. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(4):324.e1–324.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.005
  8. Dubrov VI, Strotsky AV. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic (Lich–Gregoir) and vesicoscopic (Cohen) techniques in the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children. Medical Journal. 2020;(3):68–74. EDN: UZHHKD
  9. Peláez Mata D, Herrero Álvarez S, Gómez Sánchez A, et al. Laparoscopic learning curves. Curvas de aprendizaje en laparoscopia. Cir Pediatr. 2021;34(1):20–27.
  10. Kanojia RP, Pandey A, Bawa M. Robotic assisted vesicoscopic Cohen’s reimplantation in pediatric patient: nuances of technique, experience, and outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(10):1137–1141. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0401 EDN: ZGGBBB
  11. Intagliata E, Vizzini C, Vecchio R. Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Ital Chir. 2022;92:117–121.
  12. Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg. 2001;25(11):1467–1477. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0132-2
  13. Anand S, Sandlas G, Pednekar A, et al. A comparative study of the ergonomic risk to the surgeon during vesicoscopic and robotic cross-trigonal ureteric reimplantation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0471 EDN: CMSVQB
  14. Mei H, Tang S. Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons’ world: Current situation and future prospectives. Front Pediatr. 2023;11. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120831 EDN: RBCKSR
  15. Peters CA, Woo R. Intravesical robotically assisted bilateral ureteral reimplantation. J Endourol. 2005;19(6):618–622. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.618
  16. Marchini GS, Hong YK, Minnillo BJ, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: case matched comparative study with open surgical approach. J Urol. 2011;185(5):1870–1875. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.069
  17. Chan KW, Lee KH, Tam YH, Sihoe JD. Early experience in robotic-assisted laparoscopic bilateral intravesical ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Robot Surg. 2012;6(3):259–262. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0288-1
  18. Ansari MS, Yadav P, Chakraborty A, et al. Robot-assisted foley tie ureteric tapering and reimplantation. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2024;29(2):98–103. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_131_23 EDN: QJESWS

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Cystogram demonstrating left-sided vesicoureteral reflux.

Download (188KB)
3. Fig. 2. Trocar placement (a) and docking of the robotic system (b).

Download (256KB)
4. Fig. 3. Dissection of the ureter into the bladder lumen (a) and formation of a transverse submucosal tunnel (b).

Download (253KB)
5. Fig. 4. Advancement of the ureter through the submucosal tunnel (a); ureteroneocystostomy (b).

Download (276KB)
6. Fig. 5. Bladder wall closure at the ureteral dissection site (a); view after surgery (b).

Download (266KB)

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).