Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy in a child with upper urinary tract duplication

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Upper urinary tract duplication remains one of the most challenging pediatric urology conditions. Various operative methods are used in the treatment of children with this pathology; however, reoperation rate remains high. This study aimed to investigate a case of successful robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy and discuss the technical aspects of this procedure and review known series of robotic ureteroureterostomy. The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical history of a child with duplication of the right kidney, accompanied by reflux of urine into the lower segment collecting system. Surgical intervention was performed using robot-assisted technology. Using computed tomography and voiding cystourethrography, duplex kidney with vesicorenal reflux into the lower segment was diagnosed. The surgical technique used was ureteroureterostomy. The donor ureter was divided in the area of the intended anastomosis. Then, a surgical incision was made in the recipient ureter, the length of which was equal to the diameter of the donor ureter. After preparation of the ureters, an end-to-side anastomosis was performed. The operation was successfully performed without intraoperative difficulties or complications and lasted for 140 minutes. The robot installation time (docking time) was 20 minutes, and the main console time was thus 120 minutes. The patient started feeding on the same day after the operation. The drainage tube was removed after a control ultrasound examination on postoperative day 2. The stent remained in the recipient ureter until its removal 6 weeks after surgery. The duration of follow-up was 6 months. The patient was asymptomatic throughout the control period. Repeated ultrasound examination performed after surgery showed a decrease in the anteroposterior diameter of the lower segment pelvis to 5 mm. Blood flow in the upper and lower segments of the right kidney was not impaired. The advantages of the robotic approach, including improved instrument dexterity and 3D visualization, make it a safe and effective alternative to open or laparoscopic surgery in children.

About the authors

Yury A. Kozlov

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education; Irkutsk State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: yuriherz@hotmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2313-897X
SPIN-code: 3682-0832

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk; Irkutsk

Simon S. Poloyan

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical University

Email: simonpoloyan@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7042-6646
Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk

Eduard V. Sapukhin

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: sapukhin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5470-7384

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Aleksey S. Strashinsky

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: Leksus-642@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1911-4468

MD

Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Marina V. Makarochkina

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: m.makarochkina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8295-6687
SPIN-code: 4600-4071

MD

Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Andrey A. Marchuk

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: maa-ped20@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9767-0454

MD

Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Alexander P. Rozhanskii

Irkutsk State Medical University

Email: alexanderozhanski@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7922-7600

MD

Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Anton A. Byrgazov

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: byrgazov.ant-doc38@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9195-5480

MD

Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Sergey A. Muravev

Irkutsk State Medical University

Email: muravev1999sergey@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4731-7526

MD

Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Artem N. Narkevich

South Ural State Medical University; Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University

Email: narkevichart@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1489-5058

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Prifessor

Russian Federation, Chelyabinsk; Krasnoyarsk

References

  1. Ellison JS, Lendvay TS. Robot-assisted ureteroureterostomy in pediatric patients: current perspectives. Robot Surg. 2017;4:45–55. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S99536
  2. Jain P, Parelkar S, Shah H, et al. Uncrossed complete ureteral duplication with dysplastic lower moiety: a violation of the Weigert–Meyer law. J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4(5):404–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.01.210
  3. Chacko JK, Koyle MA, Mingin GC, Furness PD. Ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy in the surgical management of the severely dilated ureter in ureteral duplication. J Urol. 2007;178(4S):1689–1692. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.098
  4. Grimsby GM, Merchant Z, Jacobs MA, Gargollo PC. Laparoscopic-assisted ureteroureterostomy for duplication anomalies in children. J Endourol. 2014;28(10):1173–1177. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0113
  5. Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic complex upper-tract reconstruction in children with a duplex collecting system. J Endourol. 2007;21(6):621–624. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0227
  6. Cohen SA, Juwono T, Palazzi KL, et al. Examining trends in the treatment of ureterocele yields no definitive solution. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(1):29.e1–29.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.09.001
  7. Le H-K, Chiang G. Long-term management of ureterocele in duplex collecting systems: Reconstruction implications. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19(2):14. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0758-3
  8. Ellsworth PI, Lim DJ, Walker RD, et al. Common sheath reimplantation yields excellent results in the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in duplicated collecting systems. J Urol. 1996;155(4):1407–1409. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66293-1
  9. Joyeux L, Lacreuse I, Schneider A, et al. Long-term functional renal outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic upper pole heminephrectomy for duplex kidney in children: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(3):1241–1249. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5098-0
  10. Jayram G, Roberts J, Hernandez A, et al. Outcomes and fate of the remnant moiety following laparoscopic heminephrectomy for duplex kidney: a multicenter review. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;7(3):272–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.029
  11. Rickwood AM, Reiner I, Jones M, Pournaras C. Current management of duplex-system ureteroceles: experience with 41 patients. Br J Urol. 1992;70(2):196–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1992.tb15703.x
  12. Lashley DB, McAleer IM, Kaplan GW. Ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux or obstruction associated with complete ureteral duplication. J Urol. 2001;165(2):552–554. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200102000-00067
  13. Abdelhalim A, Chamberlin JD, Truong H, et al. Ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy for ureteral duplication anomalies: predictors of adverse outcomes. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(5):468.e1–468.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.05.016
  14. Kagantsov IM, Sizonov VV, Dubrov VI, et al. First experience of the uretero-ureteroanastomosis (ureteropyeloanastomosis) in children with complete ureteral duplication. Urology Herald. 2017;5(4):29–38. EDN: ZXWCYX doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2017-5-4-29-38
  15. Chandrasekharam VVS, Jayaram H. Laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy for the management of children with duplication anomalies. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2015;20(1):27–31. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.145442
  16. Gerwinn T, Gnannt R, Weber DM, et al. Laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy vs. common sheath ureteral reimplantation in children with duplex kidney anomalies. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:637544. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.637544
  17. Leavitt DA, Rambachan A, Haberman K, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic ipsilateral ureteroureterostomy for ectopic ureters in children: description of technique. J Endourol. 2012;26(10):1279–1283. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0041
  18. Lee NG, Corbett ST, Cobb K, et al. Bi-Institutional comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open ureteroureterostomy in the pediatric population. J Endourol. 2015;29(11):1237–1241. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0223
  19. Biles MJ, Finkelstein JB, Silva MV, et al. Innovation in robotics and pediatric urology: robotic ureteroureterostomy for duplex systems with ureteral ectopia. J Endourol. 2016;30(10):1041–1048. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0645
  20. Kagantsov IV, Shchedrov DN, Sizonov VV, et al. Ureteral stump syndrome after ureteroureteroanastomosis, heminephrectomy and nephrectomy in children. Urology Herald. 2020;8(4):32–43. EDN: SKHIWN doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2020-8-4-32-43

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Сomputed tomography urography images demonstrating UUUT with lower segment dilatation: а — coronal section; b — threedimensional reconstruction

Download (283KB)
3. Fig. 2. MCUG image demonstrating reflux into the lower segment (indicated by arrow)

Download (108KB)
4. Fig. 3. Ureters of the lower (1) and upper (2) segments of the right kidney after dissection

Download (180KB)
5. Fig. 4. Application of anchor transparietal sutures to the wall of the recipient ureter

Download (226KB)
6. Fig. 5. Transverse section of the lower segment ureter

Download (172KB)
7. Fig. 6. Longitudinal dissection of the anteromedial wall of the recipient ureter

Download (168KB)
8. Fig. 7. Final view of robot-assisted end-to-side interureteral anastomosis

Download (207KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies