Adnexal torsion in girls: Predictors and methods for surgical treatment. Case reports and review

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Modern diagnostic and treatment methods make it possible to establish a preoperative diagnosis of uterine torsion and provide surgical assistance. Thus, the causes of this disease and the scope of surgical treatment must be investigated. This study reports the cases of 20 patients aged 3–17 years with uterine torsion who were treated at the St. Vladimir Children’s City Clinical Hospital between 2017 and 2023. Ultrasonography is a mandatory preoperative screening diagnostic method. All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. During the postoperative period, magnetic resonance imaging was performed to confirm the diagnosis. Increased ovarian size due to cysts (7), paramesonephric cysts (4), and fixed lateroflexion (6) were identified as predictors of torsion. In 3 (15%) patients, the cause of torsion was unknown. Paramesonephric cysts were resected, and two adnexectomies were performed. After detorsion, 12 (60%) patients underwent fixation of the appendages. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, eLibrary, and RSCI. A total of 47 articles were analyzed, 58 articles were reviewed, and 39 on the problems of determining predictors of uterine torsion in children and methods of surgical correction were selected. Based on the data obtained, the main disease predictors were clarified. A change in the angle of the uterus (lateroflexion) was found to cause the atypical location of the ovaries, which in turn can lead to torsion of the changed or unchanged appendage. Suggestions have been made regarding the connection between connective tissue dysplasia and uterine lateroflexion in the development of adnexal torsion in childhood. The results confirmed the complexity of the radiological diagnosis of lateroflexion. The scope of the surgical intervention for acute torsion of the uterine appendages was dependent on the etiology of the torsion and the degree of ischemia of the appendage. Various options for detorsion with unilateral and bilateral oophoropexy and without fixation of the injured appendage have been proposed. Removal of uncomplicated paramesonephric formations of the uterine appendages identified during diagnostic laparoscopy is a simple procedure and helps prevent torsion. Thus, puncture of accidentally detected ovarian cysts in patients who have not been examined for tumor markers is deemed inappropriate.

About the authors

Dmitry V. Donskoy

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Children’s State Hospital of St. Vladimir

Author for correspondence.
Email: dvdonskoy@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5076-2378
SPIN-code: 8584-8933

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Sergey A. Korovin

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: korovinsa@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8030-9926
SPIN-code: 2091-6381

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexey V. Vilesov

Children’s State Hospital of St. Vladimir

Email: vilesov.alexej@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-4545-9590
SPIN-code: 2081-3871
Russian Federation, Moscow

Roman А. Akhmatov

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Children’s State Hospital of St. Vladimir

Email: Romaahmatov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5415-0499
SPIN-code: 9024-8324
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Kadidiatou D. Sangare

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: tanti_sangare@yahoo.fr
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2395-5777
Russian Federation, Moscow

Olga A. Alimova

Children’s State Hospital of St. Vladimir

Email: dr.olga_andreevna@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-0679-885X
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Adeyemi-Fowode O, McCracken KA, Todd NJ. Adnexal torsion. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018;31(4):333–338. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.03.010
  2. Donskoy DV. Surgical tactics in urgent pelvic organ diseases in girls [dissertation abstract]. Moscow, 2000. (In Russ.)
  3. Adamian LV, Poddubnyĭ IV, Glybina TM, et al. Ovarian torsion and fibrous dysplasia in children (case report). Russian journal of human reproduction. 2014;20(5):57-59. EDN: TJAVGT
  4. Korovin SA, Dzyadchik AV, Galkina YaA, Sokolov YuYu. Laparoscopic treatment in girls with adnexal torsion. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2016;6(2):73–79. EDN: WFEYZJ doi: 10.17816/psaic252
  5. Kulakov VI, Selezneva ND, Krasnopolsky VI. Operative gynaecology. Moscow: Meditsina, 1990. 464 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Spinelli C, Tröbs R-B, Nissen M, et al. Ovarian torsion in the pediatric population: predictive factors for ovarian-sparing surgery-an international retrospective multicenter study and a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;308:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06522-3
  7. Rocha RM, Santos Barcelos IDE. Practical recommendations for the management of benign adnexal masses. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020;42(9):569–576. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714049
  8. Adeyemi-Fowode O, Lin EG, Syed F, et al. Adnexal torsion in children and adolescents: a retrospective review of 245 cases at a single institution. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(1):64–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.07.003
  9. Baracy MG Jr, Hu J, Ouillette H, Aslam MF. Diagnostic dilemma of isolated fallopian tube torsion. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(7):e242682. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-242682
  10. Harmon JC, Binkovitz LA, Binkovitz LE. Isolated fallopian tube torsion: sonographic and CT features. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38(2):175–179. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0683-y
  11. Mentessidou A, Mirilas P. Surgical disorders in pediatric and adolescent gynecology: Adnexal abnormalities. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;161(3):702–710. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14574
  12. Oltmann SC, Fischer A, Barber R, et al. Cannot exclude torsion — a 15-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(6):1212–1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.028
  13. Webster KW, Scott SM, Huguelet PS. Clinical predictors of isolated tubal torsion: a case series. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(5):578–581. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2017.05.006
  14. Breech LL, Hillard PJA. Adnexal torsion in pediatric and adolescent girls. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17(5):483–489. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000179666.39548.78
  15. Poonai N, Poonai C, Lim R, Lynch T. Pediatric ovarian torsion: case series and review of the literature. Can J Surg. 2013;56(20);103–108. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013311
  16. Ryan MF, Desai BK. Ovarian torsion in a 5-year old: a case report and review. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2012;2012:679121. doi: 10.1155/2012/679121
  17. Darrell L. Cass, ovarian torsion. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2005;14(2):86–92. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2005.01.003
  18. Boley SJ, Cahn D, Lauer T, et al. The irreducible ovary: A true emergency. J Pediatr Surg. 1991;26(9):1035–1038. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(91)90668-J
  19. Bykovsky VA, Donskoy DV. Echography in uterine appendage torsion in children: variant of therapeutic and diagnostic tactics and clinical examples. Echography. 2002;3(2):123–129. (In Russ.)
  20. Tielli A, Scala A, Alison M, et al. Ovarian torsion: diagnosis, surgery, and fertility preservation in the pediatric population. Eur J Pediatr. 2022;181(4):1405–1411. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04352-0
  21. Scheier E. Diagnosis and management of pediatric ovarian torsion in the emergency department: Current insights. Open Access Emerg Med. 2022;14:283–291. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S342725
  22. Riccabona M, Lobo M-L, Ording-Muller L-S, et al. European Society of Paediatric Radiology abdominal imaging task force recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part IX: Imaging in anorectal and cloacal malformation, imaging in childhood ovarian torsion, and efforts in standardising paediatric uroradiology terminology. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(10):1369–1380. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3837-6
  23. Ngo A-V, Otjen JP, Parisi MT, et al. Pediatric ovarian torsion: a pictorial review. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(12):1845–1855. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3385-x
  24. Huang C, Hong M-K, Ding D-C. A review of ovary torsion. Tzu Chi Med J. 2017;29(3):143–147. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_55_17
  25. Celik A, Ergün O, Aldemir H, et al. Long-term results of conservative management of adnexal torsion in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(4):704–708. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.01.008
  26. Kives S, Gascon S, Dubuc É, Eyk NV. No. 341 — Diagnosis and management of adnexal torsion in children, adolescents, and adults. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017;39(2):82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.10.001
  27. Sriram R, Zameer MM, Vinay C, Giridhar BS. Black ovary: Our experience with oophoropexy in all cases of pediatric ovarian torsion and review of relevant literature. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2022;27(5):558–560. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_207_21
  28. Gounder S, Strudwick M. Multimodality imaging review for suspected ovarian torsion cases in children. Radiography. 2021;27(1):236–242. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.006
  29. Piper HG, Oltmann SC, Xu L, et al. Ovarian torsion: diagnosis of inclusion mandates earlier intervention. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(11):2071–2076. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.06.011
  30. Chang-Patel EJ, Palacios-Helgeson LK, Gould CH. Adnexal torsion: a review of diagnosis and management strategies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2022;34(4):196–203. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000787
  31. Lourenco AP, Swenson D, Tubbs RJ, Lazarus E. Ovarian and tubal torsion: imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21(2):179–187. doi: 10.1007/s10140-013-1163-3
  32. Petlakh VI, Konovalov AK, Konstantinova IN, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of gynecological diseases in a pediatric surgeon’s practice. The Doctor. 2012;(1):3–7. EDN: OVWAJN
  33. Parelkar SV, Mundada D, Sanghvi BV, et al. Should the ovary always be conserved in torsion? A tertiary care institute experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(3):465–468. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.11.055
  34. Dasgupta R, Renaud E, Goldin AB, et al. Ovarian torsion in pediatric and adolescent patients: A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(7):1387–1391. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.053
  35. Smorgick N, Mor M, Eisenberg N, et al. Recurrent torsion of otherwise normal adnexa: oophoropexy does not prevent recurrence. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(3):821–825. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06831-7
  36. Tsafrir Z, Hasson J, Levin I, et al. Adnexal torsion: cystectomy and ovarian fixation are equally important in preventing recurrence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;162(2):203–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.027
  37. Simsek E, Kilicdag E, Kalayci H, et al. Repeated ovariopexy failure in recurrent adnexal torsion: combined approach and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):305–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.044
  38. Saberi RA, Gilna GP, Rodriguez C, et al. Ovarian preservation and recurrent torsion in children: both less common than we thought. J Surg Res. 2022;271:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.10.004
  39. Raźnikiewicz A, Korlacki W, Grabowski A. The role of laparoscopy in paediatric and adolescent gynaecology. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques. 2020;15(3):424–436. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.9781

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Adnexal torsion with transient lateroflexion of the uterus: a — adnexal torsion on the right; classical transient right-sided uterine lateroflexia caused by the mass effect; and b — condition after detorsion. The uterus is in a central position

Download (126KB)
3. Fig. 2. Adnexal torsion with left-sided lateroflexion of the uterus: a — adnexal torsion on the left; b — the condition after detorsion; and the yellow line means conditional; c — the layout of the torsioned adnexal (arrow)

Download (114KB)
4. Fig. 3. Adnexal torsion on the left: a — torsion of the “healthy” adnexa on the left. The arrow indicates the torsioned left ovary; b — right-sided uterine lateroflexia; the yellow line indicates the conditional central axis; and c — scheme of the formation of a free space in the pelvis (arrow)

Download (106KB)
5. Fig. 4. Adnexal torsion on the right: a — the left ovary above the uterus (arrow); b — state after detorsion. The left ovary maintains its position. The right adnexa in the free abdominal cavity (arrow)

Download (114KB)
6. Fig. 5. Adnexal torsion on the left. Condition after detorsion. Left-sided lateroflexion of the uterus. The arrow indicates a left-sided inguinal hernia

Download (105KB)
7. Fig. 6. Endoscopic view during revision of the pelvic organs. The arrow points to the left-sided lateroflexion of the uterus

Download (115KB)
8. Fig. 7. Magnetic resonance tomography of the lower abdominal cavity. The uterus is in the anteflexio and retroversio position, with clear boundaries. The body is tilted to the left (arrow). The right ovary at the entrance to the pelvis (oval)

Download (73KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies