Congenital portosystemic shunts: surgical treatment experience

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Congenital porto-caval shunts are rare and may have a different morphological structure (intra- and extrahepatic shunts, with or without portal blood flow). The main method of treating patients with this pathology is endovascular shunt occlusion. However, in some cases, this method is ineffective.

The article contains a description of six clinical examples of surgical treatment of congenital porto-systemic shunts in children. In the diagnosis of congenital portosystemic shunts, the leading role belongs to Doppler ultrasound, multislice computed tomography, and angiography. The indication for surgical treatment was the anatomical features of the shunt, which makes endovascular occlusion technically impossible. In one observation a wide Arantian duct was diagnosed, its open ligation was performed. In another case, the portal vein emptied directly into an aneurysmal dilatation, performed reconstructive plastic surgery on the vessels of the portal vein. In the next observation, a pronounced retrograde blood flow was determined along the dilated inferior mesenteric vein, blood was discharged through the sacral plexus into the internal iliac vein. The left internal iliac vein was isolated and ligated, the dysplastic inferior mesenteric vein was ligated and partially removed. In 2 patients, the portal vein flowed directly into the inferior vena cava in the area of aneurysmal expansion; an operation was performed — open ligation of the shunt. In one observation, a deep hypoplasia of the intrahepatic branches of the portal vein was diagnosed, and therefore the restoration of portal blood flow after the closure of the shunt is impossible. The child was sent to decide on a liver transplant.

Each case of congenital porto-caval shunts is unique. The surgeon determines the tactics directly during the operation, depending on the morphological structure of the organs, since the preoperative examination does not always give an unambiguous idea.

About the authors

Alexey E. Stepanov

Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: stepanov_alexey63@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6181-7036

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Doctor of the Department of Reconstructive and reconstructive Surgery of the abdominal organs

Russian Federation, Moscow

Maksim N. Sukhov

Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: sukhov79mn@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6972-9017
SPIN-code: 2363-1150

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Deputy Chief Physician for Surgery

Russian Federation, Moscow

Kirill G. Vasilyev

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: kiravasilyev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5106-1215

Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Pediatric Surgery of the Faculty of Pediatrics

Russian Federation, Moscow

Yuri A. Polyaev

Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: polyaev@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9554-6414
SPIN-code: 7587-9843

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Endovascular Surgery

Russian Federation, Moscow

Roman V. Garbuzov

Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: 9369025@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5287-7889
SPIN-code: 7590-2400

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Doctor of the Department of Endovascular Surgery

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anton I. Golenishchev

Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: a331821@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0278-8551

Doctor of the Department of Endovascular surgery

Russian Federation, Moscow

Konstantin Yu. Ashmanov

Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: ashmanov1964@icloud.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5106-8852

Doctor of the Department of reconstructive Surgery of the abdominal organs

Russian Federation, Moscow

Irma P. Lyvina

Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: irma_irma@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8404-3715

Doctor of the microvascular surgery Department No. 2

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alice A. Demushkina

Russian Children’s Clinical Hospital of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: demushkina.alya@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1502-8121

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Doctor of the Department of Radiology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anastasia A. Tereshina

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.tereshina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7224-5777
SPIN-code: 3502-5812

Student of the Pediatric Faculty

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Papamichail M, Pizanias M, Heaton N. Congenital portosystemic venous shunt. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2017;177(3):285–294. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-3058-x
  2. Azad S, Arya A, Sitaraman R, Garg A. Abernethy malformation: Our experience from a tertiary cardiac care center and review of literature. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;12(3):240–247. doi: 10.4103/apc.APC_185_18
  3. Razumovsky AYu, Galibin IE, Feoktistova EV, et al. Endovascular transjugular closure of arantsieva flow via vascular occluder. Russian Bulletin of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2016;6(4):78–81. (In Russ.)
  4. Lin Y, Li X, Li S, et al. Treatment option for abernethy malformation — two cases report and review of the literature. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:497447. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.497447
  5. Brunt EM. Grading and staging the histopathological lesions of chronic hepatitis: the Knodell histology activity index and beyond. Hepatology. 2000;31(1):241–246. doi: 10.1002/hep.510310136
  6. Abernethy J. Account of two instances of uncommon formation in the viscera of the human body: From the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Med Facts Obs. 1797;7:100–108.
  7. Kanazawa H, Nosaka S, Miyazaki O, et al. The classification based on intrahepatic portal system for congenital portosystemic shunts. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(4):688–695. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.01.009
  8. Morgan G, Superina R. Congenital absence of the portal vein: two cases and a proposed classification system for portasystemic vascular anomalies. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29(9):1239–1241. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90812-5
  9. Stringer MD. The clinical anatomy of congenital portosystemic venous shunts. Clin Anat. 2008;21(2):147–157. doi: 10.1002/ca.20574
  10. Lautz TB, Tantemsapya N, Rowell E, Superina RA. Management and classification of type II congenital portosystemic shunts. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(2):308–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.11.009
  11. Blanc T, Guerin F, Franchi-Abella S, et al. Congenital portosystemic surgical strategy. Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):188–198. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000266
  12. Bernard O, Franchi-Abella S, Branchereau S, et al. Congenital portosystemic shunts in children: recognition, evaluation, and management. Semin Liver Dis. 2012;32(4):273–287. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329896
  13. Sokollik C, Bandsma RHJ, Gana JC, et al. Congenital portosystemic shunt: characterization of a multisystem disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56(6):675–681. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31828b3750
  14. Matsuura T, Takahashi Y, Yanagi Y, et al. Surgical strategy according to the anatomical types of congenital portosystemic shunts in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(12):2099–2104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.046
  15. Garbuzov RV, Polyaev YuA, Stepanov AE, Mylnikov AA. Abernathy malformations in children. Experience in endovascular and surgical treatment. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2020;24(2):71–77. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18821/1560-9510-2020-24-2-71-77
  16. Sanada Y, Urahashi T, Ihara Y, et al. The role of operative intervention in management of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Surgery. 2012;151(3):404–411. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.035

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 2. Case No. 1.Mesentericoportography upper. Examination before surgery, measurement of the structures of the open Arantium duct

Download (165KB)
3. Fig. 3. Case No. 2. Mesentericoportography upper: a — examination before surgery; b — examination after 2.5 years. Portal blood flow restored

Download (88KB)
4. Fig. 5. Case No. 3. Mesentericoportography upper: а — examination before surgery. An ungliterated arantium duct is visualized, flowing into an aneurysmal expansion located on the side of the inferior vena cava; b — examination after surgery. Complete restoration of portal blood flow

Download (100KB)
5. Fig. 7. Case No. 4. Mesentericoportography upper: a — examination before surgery; b — control angiography. Condition after ligation of the pathological aorto iliac shunt. Portal blood flow is fully restored

Download (139KB)
6. Fig. 9. Case No. 5. Results of angiographic studies of patient: а — upper mesentericoportography. Examination before surgery; b — rotational transjugular phlebography of the Arantian duct with 3D reconstruction; c — mesentericoportography upper. Examination after surgery. Portal blood flow is fully restored

Download (131KB)
7. Fig. 11. Case No. 6. The results of X-ray examination of patient: a — angiography. Examination before surgery. A congenital portosystemic shunt is visualized. There is marked hypoplasia of the intrahepatic branches of the portal vein; b — computed tomography. Examination before surgery. The portocaval junction is visualized; c — computed tomography after surgery. Significant improvement in hepatic blood flow. There are no signs of a functioning congenital portosystemic shunt

Download (103KB)
8. Fig. 1. Variants of Abernathy malformation. IVC — inferior vena cava; SV — splenic vein; PV — portal vein; SMV — superior mesenteric vein

Download (113KB)
9. Fig. 4. Case No. 2. Scheme of the operation. VC — portal vein; IVC — inferior vena cava

Download (129KB)
10. Fig. 6. Case No. 3. Scheme of surgical intervention

Download (139KB)
11. Fig. 8. Case No. 4. The scheme of surgical intervention. The arrow shows the resected part of the inferior mesenteric vein: SMV — superior mesenteric vein; PV — portal vein; IVC — inferior vena cava; SV — splenic vein

Download (273KB)
12. Fig. 10. Case No. 5. Scheme of surgical intervention

Download (194KB)
13. Fig. 12. Case No. 6. Scheme of surgical intervention. PV — portal vein; IVC — inferior vena cava

Download (146KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies