Pancreatic cysts in children: diagnostical and surgical tactics

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of pancreatic cysts is one of the most difficult procedures in pediatric surgery. In children with pancreatic cysts, the issues of differential diagnosis and determining the connection of the cyst cavity with the main pancreatic duct remain problematic. Recent publications have focused on the use of endoscopic ultrasonography in pediatric practice to visualize the parenchyma and the ductal system of the pancreas with high accuracy.

AIM: This work aimed to study the results of treatment of children with cystic formations of the pancreas using modern radiation diagnostic methods and minimally invasive surgical technologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis was conducted on the results of treatment of 66 patients consisting of 30 boys (45.5%) and 36 girls (54.5%) aged 6 months to 18 years (average age of 10.9 ± 5.2 years) with extraparenchymatous and intraparenchymatous pancreatic cysts.

RESULTS: Multispiral computed tomography (Se 90%, Sp 91%, and Ac 91%; p < 0.05) and magnetic resonance imaging (Se 96%, Sp 94%, Ac 95%; p < 0.05) are the most informative for the differential diagnosis of intra- and extraparenchymatous pancreatic cysts. For thin-walled extraparenchymatous cysts up to 6 cm in size, conservative therapy is effective in the early period of the disease. External (42.4%) and internal (51.3%) drainage of cysts can be performed when the existence of pancreatic pseudocysts is prolonged (more than 2 months). Indications for simultaneous longitudinal pancreaticoejunostomy may occur in 9.5% of patients. Excision of the pseudocyst with pancreatic resection may be required in 4.7% of cases. For intraparenchymatous cysts, 33.3% of cases require the enucleation of cystic formation, 25% require the distal splenoserving resection of the pancreas, 25% require the central resection of the pancreas with the imposition of distal pancreatoejunoanastomosis, and 12.5% require pylori-preserving pancreatoduodenal resection. Approximately 70.8% of surgical interventions on the pancreas in children can be performed by laparoscopic access with a conversion rate in 12.5% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS: The choice of surgical intervention in children with pancreatic cysts is determined by the etiology, cyst size, localization, connection with the main pancreatic duct, and degree of involvement of the parenchyma in the tumor process. Most operations on the pancreas may be performed using minimally invasive approaches.

About the authors

Yurii Yu. Sokolov

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: sokolov-surg@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3831-768X
SPIN-code: 9674-1049

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, head of the department of pediatric surgery

Russian Federation, Moscow

Artem M. Efremenkov

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Central Clinical Hospital of the Management Affair of President Russian Federation

Email: efremart@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5394-0165
SPIN-code: 6873-6732

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.); associate professor of the Department of pediatric surgery; head of the Pediatric Surgical Department

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Dmitrii V. Donskoy

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; St. Vladimir Children’s Hospital

Email: dvdonskoy@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5076-2378
SPIN-code: 8584-8933

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.); associate professor of the Department of pediatric surgery; pediatric surgeon

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Roman A. Akhmatov

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; St. Vladimir Children’s Hospital

Email: romaahmatov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5415-0499
SPIN-code: 9024-8324

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.); department assistant of pediatric surgery; pediatric surgeon

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Aleksandr P. Zykin

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Central Clinical Hospital of the Management Affair of President Russian Federation

Email: Alr-z@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3551-1970
SPIN-code: 4048-7765

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.); department assistant of pediatric surgery; pediatric surgeon

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Muhammad Kh. Kaufov

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: doctorkaufov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5025-3012
SPIN-code: 5770-0227

postgraduate student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anna N. Shapkina

Far Eastern Federal University

Email: pedsurg2005@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0809-8941
SPIN-code: 4483-0450

Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor of the school of medicine

Russian Federation, Vladivostok

Kamila A. Barskaya

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: kamila.barskaya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-4041-0105
SPIN-code: 6754-5870

clinical ordinator of the Department of pediatric surgery

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Lubyansky VG, Nasonov VV. Еndoscopic transgastric drainage of liquid congestions and post-necrotic cysts in acute pancreatitis. Annals of HPB Surgery. 2015;20(4):40–44. (In Russ.) doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2015440-44
  2. Del Chiaro M, Verbeke C, Salvia R, et al. European experts consensus statement on cystic tumours of the pancreas. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45(9):703–711. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.01.010
  3. Kimura W, Nagai H, Kuroda A, et al. Analysis of small cystic lesions of the pancreas. Int J Pancreatol. 1995;18(3):197–206. doi: 10.1007/BF02784942
  4. Lee LS. Incidental cystic lesions in the pancreas: resect? EUS? Follow? Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2014;12(3):333–349. doi: 10.1007/s11938-014-0019-6
  5. Yoder SM, Rothenberg S, Tsao K, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(S1):S37–40. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0124.supp
  6. Kulevich BO, Razumovsky AYu, Kholostova VV, et al. Experience in surgical treatment of diseases of the pancreas in children. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2021;1(1):142–149. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-185-1-142-149
  7. Kim YC, Choi J-Y, Chung YE, et al. Comparison of MRI and endoscopic ultrasound in the characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(4):947–952. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3985
  8. Krishna SG, Brugge WR, Dewitt JM, et al. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: an international external interobserver and intraobserver study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(4):644–654.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.002
  9. Solodinina EN, Starkov YuG, Zamolodchikov RD, Solodinin PA. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions. Pacific Medical Journal. 2016;(1):71–75. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17238/PmJ1609-1175.2016.1.71-76
  10. Cherdantsev DV, Pervova OV, Noskov IG, et al. Possibility of radiology diagnostics of pancreatic pseudocysts. Russian electronic journal of radiology. 2018;8(4):111–117. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21569/2222-7415-2018-8-4-111-117
  11. Ge N, Hu J, Sun S, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents or plastic double-pigtail stents: A multifactorial analysis. J Transl Int Med. 2017;5(4):213–219. doi: 10.1515/jtim-2017-0036
  12. Zhu H, Jiang F, Zhu J, et al. Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc. 2017;29(6):667–675. doi: 10.1111/den.12851
  13. Yang D, Amin S, Gonzalez S, et al. Transpapillary drainage has no added benefit on treatment outcomes in patients undergoing EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: a large multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(4):720–729. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.040
  14. Yoon SB, Lee IS, Choi M-G. Metal versus plastic stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collection: A meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018;6(5):729–738. doi: 10.1177/2050640618761702
  15. Ramos-Gonzalez GJ, Medford SD, Kim HB. Transduodenal cystoduodenostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst in two young children. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2018;34:20–22. doi: 10.1016/j.epsc.2018.04.017
  16. Al-Shanafey S, Shun A, Williams S. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(7):1062–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.03.071
  17. Sharma SS, Maharshi S. Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocyst in children-a long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(9):1636–1639. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.01.026
  18. Tyberg A, Karia K, Gabr M, et al. Management of pancreatic fluid collections: A comprehensive review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(7):2256–2270. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i7.2256
  19. Campanile M, Nicolas A, LeBel S, et al. Frantz’s tumor: is mutilating surgery always justified in young patients? Surg Oncol. 2011;20(2):121–125. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2009.12.003

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: multiple posttraumatic pseudocysts

Download (95KB)
3. Fig. 2. Endoscopic ultrasound: multiple posttraumatic pseudocysts

Download (73KB)
4. Fig. 3. Endoscopic transgastric drainage of pseudocysts

Download (186KB)
5. Fig. 4. ROC analysis of the dependence of the probability of complications on the level of amylase

Download (115KB)
6. Fig. 5. ROC analysis of the dependence of the probability of complications on the patient’s age

Download (109KB)
7. Fig. 6. Algorithm of diagnostic and surgical tactics in children with pancreatic cysts: ГПП — main pancreatic protocol, МРХПГ — magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, ЭУС — endoscopic ultrasonography, ПЕА — pancreatojejunoanastomosis

Download (216KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies