Commentary on the article “Comparative analysis of the use of one-stage and two-stage urethroplasty in the treatment of children with proximal forms of hypospadias. Flap or graft?”
- Authors: Rudin Y.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology
- Issue: Vol 12, No 1 (2022)
- Pages: 69-72
- Section: Comments
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2219-4061/article/view/123584
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic1235
- ID: 123584
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Commentary on the article Surov R.V., Kagantsov I.M., Shmyrov O.S., Sizonov V.V., Volkova A.A., Zadykyan R.S., Kulaev A.V., Lasishvili M.N., Velskaya Yu.I. “Comparative analysis of the use of one-stage and two-stage urethroplasty in the treatment of children with proximal forms of hypospadias. Flap or graft?,” published in the Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2021;11(4):437–444. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic968
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Yury E. Rudin
N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology
Author for correspondence.
Email: rudin761@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5973-615X
SPIN-code: 6373-5961
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Urology
Russian Federation, 51, 3-ya Parkovaya st., Москва, 105425References
- Surov RV, Kagantsov IM, Shmyrov OS, et al. Comparative analysis of one- and two-stage urethroplasty in the treatment of proximal hypospadias in children: flap or transplant? Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2021;11(4):437–444. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic968
- Bracka A. Hypospadias repair: the two-stage alternative. Br J Urol. 1995;76(3):31–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07815.x
- Rudin YE, Maruhnenko DV, Saiedov KM. Choosing the method of correction of proximal hypospadias in children. Experimental and clinical urology. 2014;(1):81–87. (In Russ.)
