In vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic testing methods in infertility treatment of a woman with karyotype 46,XX,ins(13;4)(q34;p14p15.3),inv(4)(p14q12). Case report

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The frequency of structural chromosomal transpositions can range from 1.8 to 8% among patients with reproductive disorders. There are several types of the rarest chromosomal abnormalities: insertion (insertion of a chromosomal region) and inversion (rotation of a chromosome region). This article describes a clinical case of the infertility treatment using assisted reproductive technologies in a woman with a rare chromosomal abnormality: simultaneous insertion and inversion of chromosomes – 46, XX, ins (13;4)(q34;p14p15.3), inv(4)(p14q12). The structure and frequency of chromosomal aberrations were determined by high-throughput sequencing in preimplantation embryos. The result of the sequencing analysis showed that unbalanced variants for a known pathology were detected in 9 (56.3%) out of 16 observations, while in 6 (37%) only for a pathology known in the karyotype and in 3 (19%) they were presented simultaneously with the pathology of other chromosomes or with mosaicism. According to the results of the study, in preimplantation embryos, where one of the parents had chromosomal abnormalities, in addition to unbalanced variants, there is aneuploidy of other chromosomes not involved in the known pathology. They are described in 3 (21%) out of 14 observations of all identified pathology. In this regard, patients with aberrations in the karyotype are recommended, whenever possible, to carry out preimplantation genetic testing of structural rearrangements by methods allowed to analyze all chromosomes simultaneously. For example, high-throughput sequencing on the Illumina platform may become an alternative for prenatal diagnostics, which is performed in fertile couples with high risk of having a child with hereditary or congenital disorders. In the case of detection of chromosomal changes in the fetus, patients are faced with a number of ethical issues related to the necessity for medical abortion, which may contradict their religious and moral convictions.

About the authors

Zhanna I. Glinkina

Hi-Tech Genetics Ltd.

Author for correspondence.
Email: janna435@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0312-3797

D. Sci. (Biol.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Elena V. Kulakova

Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Email: e_kulakova@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4433-4163

Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

Elena G. Lebedeva

Clinical hospital MD GROUP

Email: elena.g.lebedeva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8010-412X

obstetrician-gynecologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

Varvara S. Kuzmicheva

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Email: barbarakuzmicheva@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3797-6360

Graduate Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Nataliya P. Makarova

Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Email: np_makarova@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1396-7272

D. Sci. (Biol.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Farkas G, Székely G, Vass N, et al. A spontán aneuploidia gyakorisága egészséges magyar populációban. Magy Onkol. 2015;59(3):198-204.
  2. Pylyp LY, Spinenko LO, Verhoglyad NV, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in patients with infertility. Tsitol Genet. 2015;49(3):33-9.
  3. Gardner RJM, Amor DJ. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. 5th ed. Oxford University Press, 2018.
  4. Wang J, Li D, Xu Z, et al. Analysis of meiotic segregation modes in biopsied blastocysts from preimplantation genetic testing cycles of reciprocal translocations. Mol Cytogenet. 2019;12:11.
  5. Chow JFC, Yeung WSB, Lee VCY, et al. Evaluation of preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangement by a commonly used next generation sequencing workflow. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;224:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.013
  6. Brunet BCFK, Shen J, Cai L, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for complex chromosomal rearrangement carriers by next-generation sequencing. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(3):375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.07.001

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. An example of the test results of the trophectoderm cells sequencing in a patient with a karyotype 46, XX, ins (13;4) (q34;p14p15.3), inv(4)(p14q12) by NGS on the Illumina platform using BlueFuse Multi software: a – Seq(1-22)x2,(XY)x1, normal molecular karyotype; b – Seq(4p15.31-4p14)x3,(XY)x1, additional genetic material of the 4p15.31-4p14 region of chromosome 4; c – Seq(4p15.32 -> 4p14)x1, (10q23.31 -> 10q26.3)x1,(15)x1,(XY)x1, a lack of genetic material of the 4p15.31-4p14 region of chromosome 4, the 10q23region.31 -> 10q26.3 chromosome 10 and monosomy of chromosome 15.

Download (246KB)

Copyright (c) 2021 Consilium Medicum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).